Publication Cover
Psychoanalytic Inquiry
A Topical Journal for Mental Health Professionals
Volume 34, 2014 - Issue 8: Psychoanalysis and Evolution: The Tentative Connection
126
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Primary Processes: A Preliminary Exploration of A-Rational Mentation from an Evolutionary Viewpoint

REFERENCES

  • Adam, R., & E. Freidin. (2009), Rationality in animal behavior: An illustration involving categorization and associative learning. In: Rational Animals, Irrational Humans, eds. S. Watanabe, A. Blaisdell, L. Huber, & A. Young. Tokyo: Keio University Press, pp. 119 –133.
  • Ainslie, G. (1974), Impulse control in pigeons. J. Experimental Anal. Behavior, 21: 485 –489.
  • Bateson, M., S. Healy, & T. Hurly. (2002), Irrational choices in hummingbird foraging behaviour. Animal Behav., 63: 587 –596.
  • Bateson, M., S. Healy, & T. Hurly. (2003), Context-dependent foraging decisions in rufous hummingbirds. Proc. Royal Soc. of London, Series B., 240: 1271 –1276.
  • Blaisdell, A., K. Leising, & M. Waldmann. (2006), Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 311: 1020 –1022.
  • Brakel, L. A. W. (2002), Phantasy and wish: a proper function account of a-rational primary process mediated mentation. Australasian J. Philosophy, 80: 1 –16
  • Brakel, L. A. W.. (2009), Philosophy, Psychoanalysis and the A-Rational Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Brakel, L. A. W.. (2010), Unconscious Knowing and Other Essays in Psycho-Philosophical Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Brakel, L. A. W., & H. Shevrin. (2003), Freud’s dual process theory and the place of the a-rational. Continuing Commentary on Stanovich & West (2001). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23: 645 –666.
  • Brenner, C. (1982), The Mind in Conflict. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Brenner, C.. (1994), The mind as conflict and compromise formation. J. Clin. Psychoanal., 3: 473 –488.
  • Brenner, C.. (2002), Conflict, compromise formation and structural theory. Psychoanal. Q., 71: 397 –417.
  • Caraco, T., S. Martindale, & T. Whittam. (1980), An empirical demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Animal Behaviour, 28: 820 –830.
  • Castro, L., E. Wasserman, & H. Matute. (2009), Learning about absent events in human contingency judgments. In: Rational Animals, Irrational Humans, eds. S. Watanabe, A. Blaisdell, L. Huber, & A. Young. Tokyo: Keio University Press, pp. 83 –99.
  • Chen, M, V. Lakshminarayanan, & L. Santos. (2006), How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. J. Political Economy, 114: 517 –537.
  • Dwyer, D., J. Starns, & R. Honey. (2009), ‘Causal reasoning’ in rats: A reappraisal. J. Experimental Psych.: Animal Behav. Processes, 35: 578 –586.
  • Fernando, C., A. Liekens, L. Bingle, C. Beck, T. Lenser, D. Steckel, & J. Rowe. (2009), Molecular circuits for associative learning in single- celled organisms. J. Royal Society Interface, 6: 463 –469.
  • Finucane, M. L., A. Alhakami, P. Slovic, & S. M. Johnson. (2000), The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J. Behavioral Decision Making, 13: 1 –17.
  • Fishman, J. (1993), New clues surface about the making of mind. Science, 262: 1517.
  • Freud, S. (1900), The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition, Vol. 4 & 5. London: Hogarth Press, 1953.
  • Freud, S.. (1911), Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. Standard Edition, Vol. 12. London: Hogarth Press, 213 –226.
  • Garcia, J., D. Kimeldorf, & R. Koelling. (1955), Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science, 122:157 –158.
  • Garlick, D., D. Gant, L. A. W. Brakel, & A. Blaisdell. (2011), Attributional and relational processing in pigeons. Frontiers in Compar. Psych., 2: 14 –45.
  • Green, L., E. Fisher, S. Perlow, & L. Sherman. (1981), Preference reversal and self-control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 1: 43 –51.
  • Heider, F., & M. Simmel. (1944), An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am. J. of Psychology, 57: 243 –259.
  • Huber, L. (2009), Degrees of rationality in human and non-human animals. In: Rational Animals, Irrational Humans, ed. S. Watanabe, A. Blaisdell, L. Huber, & A. Young. Tokyo: Keio University Press, pp. 3 –21.
  • Hurley, S., & M. Nudds, eds. (2006), Rational Animals? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Kacelnik, A. (2006), Meanings of rationality. In: Rational Animals?, ed. S. Hurley & M. Nudds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 87 –106.
  • Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Kahneman, D., & A. Tversky. (1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47: 263 –292.
  • Lorenz, K. (1935), Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels. Journal fiir Ornithologie, 83: 137–213, 289–413.
  • Marsh, B., & A. Kacelnik. (2002), Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings. Proceed. Natl Academy of Sci., 99: 3352 –3355.
  • Marsh, B., C. Schuck-Paim, & A. Kacelnik. (2004), Energetic state during learning affects foraging choices in starlings. Behavioral Ecology, 15: 396 –399.
  • Mayr, E. (1982), The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Nesse, R., & G. Williams. (1994), Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Nobelprize.org. (2012), The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2002. 16 Sep 2012 http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/
  • Papineau, D., & C. Heyes. (2006), Rational or associative? Imitation in Japanese quail. In: Rational Animals?, ed. S. Hurley & M. Nudds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 187 –195.
  • Penn, D., & D. Povinelli. (2009), On becoming approximately rational: the relational reinterpretation hypothesis. In: Rational Animals, Irrational Humans, ed. S. Watanabe, A. Blaisdell, L. Huber, & A. Young. Tokyo: Keio University Press, pp. 23 –43.
  • Pompilio, L, A. Kacelnik, & S. Behmer. (2006), State-dependent learned values drives choice in an invertebrate. Science, 311: 1613 –1615.
  • Rosati, A., & J. Stevens. (2009), Rational decisions: The adaptive nature of context-dependent choice. In: Rational Animals, Irrational Humans, ed. S. Watanabe, A. Blaisdell, L. Huber, & A. Young. Tokyo: Keio University Press. pp. 101 –117.
  • Schuck-Paim, C., & A. Kacelnik. (2007), Choice processes in multi-alternative decision making. Behav. Ecol., 18: 541 –550
  • Shafir, S., T. Waite, & B. Smith. (2002), Context-dependent violations of rational choice in honeybees and gray jays. Behavior. Ecol. and Sociobiology, 51:, 180 –187.
  • Stanovich, K. E., & R. F. West. (2000), Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23: 645 –726.
  • Steigler, G. J. (1950), The development of utility theory. J. Politic. Econ., 58: 307 –327.
  • Tversky, A., & D. Kahneman. (1985), Judgments of and by representativeness. In: Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, ed. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 84 –98.
  • Von Bayern, A., & N. Emery. (2009), Bonding, mentalising and rationality. In: Rational Animals, Irrational Humans, ed. S. Watanabe, A. Blaisdell, L. Huber, & A. Young. Tokyo: Keio University Press, pp. 287 –303.
  • Waite, T. (2001), Intransitive preferences in hoarding gray jays. Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiology, 50: 116 –121.
  • Watanabe, S., A. Blaisdell, L. Huber, & A. Young, eds. (2009), Rational Animals, Irrational Humans. Tokyo, Japan: Keio University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.