Truth and Consequences: What We Lose and Gain in Psychoanalytic Postmodernism

REFERENCES

• Aron, L. (1991), The patient’s experience of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanal. Dial., 1: 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L.. (1992), Interpretation as expression of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanal. Dial., 2: 475–507.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L.. (1996), A Meeting of Minds. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, G., & R. Stolorow. (1984), Structures of Subjectivity: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Phenomenology. Hiilsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacal, H., & B. Herzog. (2003), Specificity theory and optimal responsiveness: An outline. Psychoanal. Psychol., 20: 635–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, M. (1998), Postmodern epistemology: The problem of validation and the retreat from therapeutics in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dial., 8: 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, B. (1993), Psychoanalysis and the Postmodern Impulse: Knowing and Being Since Freud’s Psychology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, B.. (1995), Review essay: Madness and modernism: Insanity in the light of modern art, literature, and thought, by Louis Sass. Psychoanal. Dial., 5: 113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B. (2005), Mother–infant research informs mother–infant treatment. Psychoanal. Study of the Child, 60: 7–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., & F. Lachmann. (1988a), Mother–infant mutual influence and precursors of psychic structure. In: Frontiers in Self Psychology: Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 3, ed. A. Goldberg. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., & F. Lachmann. (1988b), The contribution of mother–infant mutual influence to the origins of self and object representations. Psychoanal. Psychol., 5: 305–337.
   Google Scholar
• Begley, L. (2013), Memories of a Marriage. New York: Nan A. Talese/Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2004), Beyond doer or done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanal. Quart., 73: 5–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston Change Process Study Group. (1998), Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The ‘something more’ than interpretation. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 79: 903–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston Change Process Study Group. (2002), Explicating the implicit: The local level and the microprocess of change in the analytic situation. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 83: 1051–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bott Spillius, E. (2004), Melanie Klein Revisited: Her Unpublished Thoughts on Technique. Unpublished paper presented at the Massachusetts Institute for Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Institute of New England East. Cambridge, MA. April 3rd.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. (1996), Standing in the spaces: The multiplicity of self and the psychoanalytic relationship. Contemp. Psychoanal., 32: 509– 535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P.. (2009), Truth, human relatedness, and the analytic process: An interpersonal/relational perspective. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 90: 347–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucci, W. (1997), Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Science: A Multiple Code Theory. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucci, W.. (2001), Pathways of emotional communication. Psychoanal. Inq., 21: 40–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, W. (2006), Self Psychology after Kohut: One theory or too many? Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 1: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, W.. (2013), Pouring old wine directly into our mouths. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 7.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert, R. (2009), Ebert’s movie review web site. www.rogerebert.com
   Google Scholar
• Eliot, T. S. (1917), The Complete Poems and Plays 1901–1950. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Emde, R. (1990), Mobilizing fundamental modes of development: Empathic availability and therapeutic action. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38: 881–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairfield, S. (2001), Analyzing multiplicity: A postmodern perspective on some current psychoanalytic theories of subjectivity. Psychoanal. Dial., 11: 221–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosshage, J. (1995), Countertransference as the analyst’s experience of the analysand: Influence of listening perspectives. Psychoanal. Psychol., 12: 375–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1923), The ego and the id. Standard Edition, 19: 13–66. London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geist, D. (2008), Connectedness, permeable boundaries and the development of the self. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 3: 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Grotstein, J. (1980), The significance of Kleinian contributions to psychoanalysis: II. Freudian and Kleinian conceptions of early mental development. Internat. J. of Psychoanal. Psychother., 8: 393–428.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hershberg, S. (2013), Coming out of hiding. Psychoanal. Dial., 23: 377–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. (1991), Discussion: Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Dial., 1: 74–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I.. (1992), Some practical implications of a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Dial., 2: 287–304.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. (1994), Dialectical thinking and therapeutic action in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Quart., 63: 187–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I.. (1996), The intimate and ironic authority of the psychoanalyst’s presence. Psychoanal. Quart., 65: 102–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I.. (1998), Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process: A Dialectical-Constructivist View. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. (2001), On unconscious coummunications and covert enactments: Psychoanal. Inq., 21: 4–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. (2005), Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis, and the New Biology of Mind. Washington, DC: Psychiatry Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kindler, A. (2005), Improvisation and spontaneity in psychoanalysis. Unpublished paper presented at the 28th International Conference on the Psychology of the Self. Baltimore, MD, October 22.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, S. (2000), The Musical Edge of Psychoanalytic Dialogue. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, S.. (2005), Body rhythms and the unconscious: Toward an expanding of clinical attention. Psychoanal. Dial., 15: 807–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1971), The Analysis of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H.. (1977), The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H.. (1984), How Does Analysis Cure?, ed. A. Goldberg & P. Stepansky. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H., & P. Seitz. (1963), Concepts and theories of psychoanalysis. In: The Search for the Self, Vol. 1, ed. P. Ornstein. New York: International Universities Press, 1978, pp. 337–374.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, F. (2000), Transforming Aggression. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, F. (2008). Transforming Narcissism. New York, London: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, F., & B. Beebe. (1996), The contribution of self- and mutual regulation to therapeutic action: A case illustration. In: Basic Ideas Reconsidered: Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 12, ed. A. Goldberg. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Lahr, J. (2013), Varieties of disturbance. New Yorker, September 9. www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/009/09/varieties-of-disturbance-2
   Google Scholar
• Levonkron, H. (2006), Love (and) hate with the proper stranger: Affective honesty and enactment. Psychoanal. Inq., 26: 157–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, J. (1989), Psychoanalysis and Motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, J., F. Lachmann, & J. Fosshage. (1992), Self and Motivational Systems: Towards a Theory of Psychoanalytic Technique. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, J., F. Lachmann, & J. Fosshage. (1996), The Clinical Exchange: Techniques Derived from Self and Motivational Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, J., F. Lachmann, & J. Fosshage. (2011), Psychoanalysis and Motivational Systems: A New Look. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Likerman, M. (2006), Unconscious experience: Relational perspectives. Psychoanal. Dial., 16: 365–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loew, R. (2013), Attachment and artistic expression. Psychoanal. Dial., 23: 356–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999), Two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanal. Quart., 19: 576–617.
   Google Scholar
• Mancia, M. (2006), Implicit memory and early unrepressed unconscious. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 87: 83–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1993), Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.. (1996), When interpretations fail: A new look at the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. In: Understanding Therapeutic Action: Psychodynamic Concepts of Cure, ed. L. Lifson. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 165–186.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.. (1997), Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, E., director. (1988), The Thin Blue Line.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, E.. (2005), Editorial: There is such a thing as truth, May 2. www.errolmorris.com/content/editorial/npr505.html
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (1986), The Matrix of the Mind. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T.. (1992), The dialectically constituted/decentered subject of psychoanalysis, I: The contributions of Klein and Winnicott. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 73: 613–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T.. (1994), Subjects of Analysis. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, D. (2006), For whom the bell tolls: complexity, context, and compassion in psychoanalysis. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 1: 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, D.. (2009), Toward the art of a living dialogue: Between constructivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic thinking. In: Beyond Postmodernism: New Dimensions in Clinical Theory and Practice, ed. R. Frie & D. Orange. New York: Routledge, pp. 117–142.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, D., G. Atwood, & R. Stolorow. (1997), Working Intersubjectively: Contextualism in Psychoanalytic Practice. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, J. (2006), A systems sensibility: Comments on Judith Teicholz’s “Qualities of Engagement and the analyst’s theory.” Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 1: 301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Pizer, S. (1998), The Negotiation of Paradox in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polley, S., director. (2012), The Stories We Tell. National Film Board of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1993), Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in the light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Quart., 62: 555–571.
   Google Scholar
• Renik, O.. (1996), The perils of neutrality. Psychoanal. Quart., 65: 495–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O.. (1998), Getting real in analysis. Psychoanal. Quart., 67: 566–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringstrom, P. (2001), Cultivating the improvisational in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dial., 11: 727–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringstrom, P. (2005), Developing clinical momentum with a focus on dramatic moments and improvisation. Unpublished paper presented at the 28th Annual International Conference of the Psychology of the Self. Baltimore, MD, October 22.
   Google Scholar
• Ringstrom, P.. (2007), Scenes that write themselves: Improvisational moments in relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dial., 17: 69–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, P. (1998), Trauma, Repetition, and Affect Regulation: The Work of Paul Russell, ed. J. Teicholz & D. Kriegman. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, L. (2002), Thinking differently: Principles of process in living systems and the specificity of being known. Psychoanal. Dial., 12: 11–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schore, A. (2002), Advances in neuropsychoanalysis, attachment theory, and trauma research: Implications for self psychology. Psychoanal. Inq., 22: 433–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schore, A.. (2003a), Affect Regulation and the Repair of the Self. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Schore, A.. (2003b). Affect Dysregulation and Disorders of the Self. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Socarides, D., & R. Stolorow. (1984-1985), Affects and selfobjects. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 12/13: 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• St. Aubyn, E. (2013), Taken to heart. NYT Book Review, August 11, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1985), The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. (2013), Intersubjective systems theory: A phenomenological-contextual psychoanalytic perspective. Psychoanal. Dial., 23: 383–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R., B. Brandchaft, & G. Atwood. (1987), Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G. (1995), Loewald’s ‘positive neutrality’ and the affirmative potential of psychoanalytic interventions. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 50: 48–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G.. (1996), Optimal responsiveness: Its role in psychic growth and change. In: Understanding Therapuetic Action: Psychodynamic Aspects of Cure, ed. L. Lifson. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 139–161.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G.. (1998), Self and relationship: Kohut, Loewald and the postmoderns. In: The World of Self Psychology: Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 14, ed. A. Goldberg. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 267–292.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G. (1999), Kohut, Loewald & the Postmoderns: A Comparative Study of Self and Relationship. Northvale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G. (2000), The analyst’s empathy, subjectivity, and authenticity: Affect as the common denominator. In: How Responsive Should We Be?: Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 16, ed. A. Goldberg. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G.. (2001), The many meanings of intersubjectivity and their implications for analyst self-expression and self-disclosure. In: The Narcissistic Patient Revisited: Progress In Self Psychology, Vol. 17, ed. A. Goldberg. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 9–42.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G.. (2006a), Qualities of engagement and the analyst’s theory. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 1: 47–77.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G.. (2006b), Enactment as therapeutic hand-grenade: Discussion of Holly Levenkron’s “Love (and hate) with the proper stranger.” Psychoanal. Inq., 26: 263–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G.. (2008), Plurality versus loyalty to self psychology: A false choice? Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 3: 240–243.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G.. (2009), A strange convergence: Postmodern theory, infant research, and psychoanalysis. In: Beyond Postmodernism: New Dimensions in Clinical Theory and Practice, ed. R. Frie & D. Orange. London: Routledge, pp. 69–91.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, J. G.. (2014), Treating trauma: The analyst’s own affect regulation and expression. Psychoanal. Inq., 34: 364–379.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. (1962), Affect, Imagery, Consciousness, Vol. I, The Positive Affects. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthan, C. (2005), First things first: Infants make good use of the sympathetic rhythm of imitations, without reason or language. J. Child Psychother., 31: 91–113.
   Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (2002), A model of infant mood states and Sanderian affective waves. Psychoanal. Dial., 12: 73–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronick, E.. (2007), The Neurobehavioral and Socio-Emotional Development of Infants and Children. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Tubert-Oklander, J. (2006), I, thou, and us: Relationality and the interpretive process in clinical practice. Psychoanal. Dial., 16: 199–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisel-Barth, J. (2006), Thinking and writing about complexity theory in the clinical setting. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 1: 365–389.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. (1960), Ego distortion in terms of true and false self. In: The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 140–152.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D.. (1971), Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wolitzer, M. (2013), Our kind of people: Louis Begley’s memories of a marriage. NYT Book Review, August 4. www.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/books/review/louis-begleys-memories-of-a-marriage.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar