730
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Conclusion

Behind Closed Doors: Sadomasochistic Enactments and Psychoanalytic Research

REFERENCES

  • American Psychological Association. (2006), Graduate Study in Psychology. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Atwood, G. E., & R. D. Stolorow. (1984), Structures of Subjectivity: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Phenomenology. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Bornstein, R. F. (2001), The impending death of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Psych., 18: 2 –20.
  • Bornstein, R. F.. (2002), The impending death of psychoanalysis: From destructive obfuscation to constructive dialogue. Psychoanal. Psych., 19: 580 –590.
  • Bornstein, R. F.. (2005), Reconnecting psychoanalysis to mainstream psychology. Psychoanal. Psych., 22: 323 –340.
  • Bornstein, R. F.. (2009), Assessment of personality. In: Clinical Psychology: Assessment, Treatment, and Research, ed. D. C. Richard & S. K. Huprich. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, pp. 91 –112.
  • Bornstein, R. F.. (2010), Psychoanalytic theory as a unifying framework for 21st century personality assessment. Psychoanal. Psych., 27: 133 –152.
  • Bornstein, R. F., & N. Becker-Matero. (2011), Reconnecting psychoanalysis to mainstream psychology: Metaphor as glue. Psychoanal. Inq., 31: 172 –184.
  • Bornstein, R. F., C. A. Denckla, & W. J. Chung. (2013), Psychodynamic models of personality. In: Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology, Volume 5: Personality and Social Psychology, 2nd edition, ed. I. B. Weiner & H. Tennen. New York: Wiley, pp. 43–64.
  • Bornstein, R. F., & J. M. Masling, eds. (1998), Empirical Perspectives on the Psychoanalytic Unconscious. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Bornstein, R. F., & J. M. Masling, eds. (2002), The Psychodynamics of Gender and Gender Role. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Bucci, W. (2000), The need for a “Psychoanalytic Psychology” in the cognitive science field. Psychoanal. Psych., 17: 203 –224.
  • Dawes, R. M. (1994), House of Cards: Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth. New York: Free Press.
  • Eagle, M. N. (2007), Psychoanalysis and its critics. Psychoanal. Psych., 24: 10 –24.
  • Eagle, M. N., & D. L. Wolitsky. (2011), Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies: A valid antagonism? J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 59: 797 –818.
  • Erdelyi, M. H. (2006), The unified theory of repression. Behavioral and Brain Sci., 29: 499 –511.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1958), Young Man Luther. New York: Norton.
  • Fisher, S., & R. P. Greenberg. (1996), Freud Scientifically Reappraised. New York: Wiley.
  • Freud, S. (1905), Fragments of an analysis of a case of hysteria. Standard Edition, 7: 3 –132. London: Hogarth Press, 1958.
  • Friman, P. C., K. D. Allen, M. L. E. Kerwin, & R. Larzelere. (1993), Changes in modern psychology: A citation analysis of Kuhnian Displacement Thesis. Amer. Psych., 48: 658 –662.
  • Funder, D. C. (2007), The Personality Puzzle, 4th edition. New York: Norton.
  • Gacono, C. B., & J. R. Meloy. (1994), The Rorschach Assessment of Aggressive and Psychopathic Personalities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Haggbloom, S. J., R. Warnick, J. E. Warnick, V. K. Jones, G. L. Yarbrough, T. M. Russell, ... E. Monte. (2002), The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Rev. of Gen. Psych., 6: 139 –152.
  • Hoffman, I. Z. (2009), Doublethinking our way to scientific legitimacy: The desiccation of human experience. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 57: 1043 –1069.
  • Huprich, S. K. (2009), Psychodynamic Therapy: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
  • Huprich, S. K., C. B. Gacono, R. B. Schneider, & M. R. Bridges. (2004), Rorschach oral dependency in psychopaths, pedophiles, and sexual homicide perpetrators. Behav. Sci. and the Law, 22: 345 –356.
  • Josephs, L., E. Anderson, A. Bernard, K. Fatzer, & J. Streich. (2004), Assessing progress in Analysis Interminable. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 52: 1185 –1214.
  • Kandel, E. R. (1988), A new intellectual framework for psychiatry. Amer. J. Psych., 155: 457 –469.
  • Karon, B. P. (2002), Psychoanalysis: Legitimate and illegitimate concerns. Psychoanal. Psych., 19: 564 –571.
  • Kihlstrom, J. F. (1999), A tumbling ground for whimsies? Contemp. Psych., 44: 376 –378.
  • Leichsenring, F., & S. Rabung. (2008), Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. J. Amer. Med. Assn., 300: 1151 –1568.
  • Luyten, P., S. J. Blatt, & J. Corveleyn. (2006), Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 54: 572 –609.
  • Mahoney, M. J. (1977), Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cog. Ther. and Res., 1: 161 –175.
  • Malcolm, J. (1982), Psychoanalysis: The Impossible Profession. New York: Vintage.
  • Masling, J. M. (1990), Preface. In: Empirical Studies of Psychoanalytic Theories (Vol. 3), ed. J. M. Masling. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. v–xv.
  • Masling, J. M., & R. F. Bornstein, eds. (1996), Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Developmental Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Masling, J. M., L. Rabie, & S. H. Blondheim. (1967), Obesity, level of aspiration, and the Rorschach and TAT measures of oral dependence. J. Consult. Psych., 31: 233 –239.
  • Meissner, W. W. (2006), Prospects for psychoanalysis in the 21st century. Psychoanal. Psych., 23: 239 –256.
  • Meloy, J. R. (1992), Violent Attachments. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • Mills, J. (2002), Reexamining the psychoanalytic corpse: From scientific psychology to philosophy. Psychoanal. Psych., 19: 552 –558.
  • Milrod, B., A. C. Leon, F. Busch, M. Rudden, M. Schwalberg, J. Clarkin, ... K. M. Shear. (2007), A randomized controlled clinical trial of psychoanalytic psychotherapy for panic disorder. Amer. J. Psych., 164: 265 –272.
  • Mitchell, S. J. (2000), Response to silverman (2000). Psychoanal. Psych., 17: 153 –159.
  • Myers, D. G. (2007), Psychology, 8th edition. New York: Worth.
  • Norcross, J. C., R. S. Karg, & J. O. Prochaska. (1997), Clinical psychologists in the 1990s. Clin. Psych., 50: 4 –9.
  • Novick, J., & K. K. Novick. (1991), Some comments on masochism and the delusion of omnipotence from a developmental perspective. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39: 307 –331.
  • Novick, J., & K. K. Novick. (1996), Fearful Symmetry. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • Novick, J., & K. K. Novick. (2003), Two systems of self-regulation and the differential application of psychoanalytic technique. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 63: 1 –20.
  • Porcerelli, J. H., V. B. Dauphin, J. S. Ablon, S. Leitman, & M. Bambery. (2007), Psychoanalysis with avoidant personality disorder: A systematic case study. Psychother.: Theory/Res./Prac./Training, 44: 1 –13.
  • Rangell, L. (1988), The future of psychoanalysis: The scientific crossroads. Psychoanal. Quart., 59: 347 –369.
  • Rapaport, D., M. M. Gill, & R. Schafer. (1968), Diagnostic Psychological Testing. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Robins, R. W., S. D. Gosling, & K. H. Craik. (1999), An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. Amer. Psychol., 54: 117 –128.
  • Rothstein, A. (1995), Psychoanalytic Technique and the Creation of Analytic Patients. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
  • Shedler, J. (2010), The efficacy of psychodynamic therapy. Amer. Psych., 65: 98 –109.
  • Sperling, M. B., A. Sack, & C. L. Field. (2000), Psychodynamic Practice in a Managed Care Environment. New York: Guilford.
  • Stolorow, R. D., G. E. Atwood, & B. Brandchaft. (1994), The Intersubjective Perspective. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • Waiess, E. A. (2002), The continuing presence of psychoanalysis: A reply to Robert F. Bornstein (2001), Psychoanal. Psych., 19: 559 –563.
  • Wallerstein, R. S. (1986), Forty-Two Lives in Treatment: A Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford.
  • Westen, D. (1998), The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science. Psycholog. Bull., 124: 333 –371.
  • Westen, D., & G. O. Gabbard. (2002), Developments in cognitive neuroscience: I. Conflict, compromise, and connectionism. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 50: 53 –98.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.