Confrontation and the Fool’s Method

References

• Alexander, F. (1950), Analysis of the therapeutic factors in psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanal. Quart., 19: 482–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, F. (1953), Current views on psychotherapy. In: The Scope of Psychoanalysis: Selected Papers of Franz Alexander 1921–1961. New York: Basic Books, pp. 276–289.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. (1962), How To Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bibring, E. (1954), Psychoanalysis and the dynamic psychotherapies. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2: 745–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. (1991), Harold Bloom, the art of criticism No. 1. Interview by A. Weiss. Paris Rev., 33(118): 179–232.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. (1994), The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1982), The Mind in Conflict. New York: International University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buie, D. H., & G. Adler. (1973), The uses of confrontation in the psychotherapy of borderline cases. In: Confrontation in Psychotherapy, ed. G. Adler & P. Myerson. New York: Science House, pp. 123–146.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, F. (2016), Unraveling an enigma. Psychoanal. Inq., 36: 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K. (1956), The Nude: A Study in Ideal Form. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Corwin, H. (1973), Therapeutic confrontation from routine to heroic. In Confrontation in Psychotherapy, ed. G. Adler & P. Myerson. New York: Science House, pp. 67–95.
   Google Scholar
• Devereux, G. (1951), Some criteria for the timing of confrontations and interpretations. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 32: 19–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etchegoyen, H. (1991), Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique. London: Karnac, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fenichel, O. (1941), Problems of Psychoanalytic Technique. New York: Psychoanalytic Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro, A., & G. Civitarese. (2016), Confrontation in the Bionian model of the analytic field. Psychoanal. Inq., 36: 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosshage, J. L. (1990), Clinical protocol, Psychoanal. Inq., 10: 461–477.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1894), The neuropsychoses of defence. Standard Edition, 3: 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1974). Index. Standard Edition, 24. London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. (1988), The Anatomy of Psychotherapy. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. (1997), Ferrum, ignis, and medicina: return to the crucible. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 45: 20–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1996), Psychoanalytic words and psychoanalytic acts—A brief history. Contemp. Psychoanal., 32: 195–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenson, R. R. (1967), The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis, Vol I. New York: International University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, B. (1989), Psychic Equilibrium and Psychic Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1975), Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Kite, J. V. (2008), Ideas of influence: The impact of the analyst’s character on the analysis. Psychoanal. Quart., 77: 1075–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFarge, L. (2016), The stranger within and the stranger without: Confrontation in a two-person process. Psychoanal. Inq., 36: 273–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, R. D. (1967), The Politics of Experience. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (1972), The Fallacy of Understanding. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (1988), Show and tell: the recursive order of transference. In: How Does Treatment Help, ed. A. Rothstein. Madison, CT: International University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, S. (1973), Confrontation as a demand for change. In: Confrontation in Psychotherapy, ed. A. G. Adler & P. Myerson. New York: Science House, pp. 303–317.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1978), Primary process, secondary process, and language. In: Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, R. M. (1951), The problem of interpretation. Psychoanal. Quart., 20: 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, R. M. (1952), Abstract of “The problem of interpretation.” Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 33: 74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, K. (1992), Introduction to King Lear. In: The Arden Shakespeare, ed. R. Proudfoot & A. Thomson. London: Routledge, pp. xiii–lviii.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. (1973), The purpose of confrontation. In: Confrontation in Psychotherapy, ed. G. Adler & P. Myerson. New York: Science House, pp. 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, P. (1973), The meanings of confrontation. In: Confrontation in Psychotherapy, ed. G. Adler & P. Myerson. New York: Science House, pp. 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary. (1971), Compact edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, W. (1933), Character Analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1969), King Lear and the use of humor in treatment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn, 17: 927–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1969), Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semrad, E. V. (1969), Teaching Psychotherapy of Psychotic Patients. New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, W. (1606), King Lear. In: The Arden Shakespeare, ed. K. Muir. London: Routledge, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, E. (1970), Key Concepts in Psychotherapy (2nd ed.). New York: Jason Aronson, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (2000), Countertransference, conflictual listening, and the analytic object relationship. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 48: 95–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (2003), Conceptions of conflict in psychoanalytic theory and practice. Psychoanal. Quart., 52: 49–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (2006), Analyzing disavowed action: The fundamental resistance of analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 54: 713–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, J. (2016), Man’s inhumanity to man: Confrontations and prejudice. Psychoanal. Inq., 36: 285–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocking, M. (1973), Confrontation in psychotherapy: Considerations arising from the psychoanalytic treatment of a child. In: Confrontation in Psychotherapy, ed. G. Adler & P. Myerson, pp. 319–346.
   Google Scholar