Publication Cover
Psychoanalytic Inquiry
A Topical Journal for Mental Health Professionals
Volume 37, 2017 - Issue 8: Artificial Reproduction Techniques and Psychotherapy
281
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

“Where Did I Come From?” The Impact of ART on Families and Psychotherapists

, LCSW

References

  • Allison, G. H. (1997), Motherhood, motherliness, and psychogenic infertility. Psychoanal. Quart., 66: 1–17.
  • Allison, G., & R. Doria-Medina. (1999), New reproductive techniques. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 80: 163–166.
  • Apfel, R. J., & R. G. Keylor. (2002), Psychoanalysis and infertility: Myths and realities. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 83: 85–104.
  • Applegarth, L. D., & M. P. Riddle. (2007), What do we know and what can we learn from families created through egg donation? J. Infant Child Adolesc. Psychother., 6: 90–96.
  • Atkinson, J. (1987), Astor, J. & M. Pawson. (1985), “The value of psycho-metric testing in the investigation of infertility.” J. of Psychosom. Obstetrics and Gyne., Vol. 5 (1985). J. of Amer. of Anal. Psych., 32: 283.
  • Bell, S. (2011), Growing concerns about non regulation of donors—really?? Amer. Fertility Assoc. blog, March 9, 2012.
  • Benedek, T. (1952), Psychosocial Functions in Women. New York: Ronald Press.
  • _____, & B. B. Rubenstein. (1942), The Sexual Cycles in Women: The Relation Between Ovarian Function and Psychodynamic Processes. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • Blindley, K. (2011), Renee Almeling’s ‘sex cells’ explores marketing of reproductive donation. [email protected]., September 21, 2011.
  • Ehrensaft, D. (2000), Alternatives to the stork: Fatherhood fantasies in donor insemination families. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 1: 371–397.
  • _____. (2007), The stork didn’t bring me, I came from a dish: Psychological experiences of children conceived through assisted reproductive technology. J. of Infant, Child, and Adolesc. Psychoth., 6(2): 124–140.
  • _____. (2008a), Just Molly and me, and donor makes three: Lesbian motherhood in the age of assisted reproductive technology. J. of Lesbian Studies, 12(22-3): 161–178.
  • _____. (2008b), When baby makes three or four or more: Attachment, individuation, and identity in assisted-conception families. Psychoanal. Study of the Child, 63: 3–23.
  • _____. (2011), Family complexes and Oedipal circles: Mothers, fathers, babies, donors, and surrogates. Paper given at Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis, Chicago, October 25, 2011. In: Psychoanalytic Aspects of Assisted Reproductive Technology, ed. M. Mann. London: Karnac, 2014, pp. 19–44.
  • _____. (2012), Gametes for sale, wombs for rent, babies to raise. In: A Psychodynamic Understanding of Modern Medicine, ed. Maureen O’Reilly-Landry. London: Routledge, pp. 162–173.
  • Golombok, S., R. Cook, A. Bish, & C. Murray. (1995), Families created by the new reproductive technologies; Quality of parenting and social emotional development of the children. Child Develop., 66: 285–298.
  • _____, & F. MacCallum. (2003), Practitioner review: Outcomes for parents and children following non-traditional conception: What do clinicians need to know? J. of Child Psych & Psychiat., 44(3): 303–315.
  • _____, F. MacCallum, & E. Goodman. (2001), The “test tube” generation: Parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of the in vitro fertilization children at adolescence. Child Develop., 72(2): 599–608.
  • _____, & C. Murray. (1999), Social versus biological parenting: Family functioning and the socioemotional development of children conceived by egg or sperm donation. J. Child Psychol. & Psychiat., 40(4): 519–597.
  • Gregory, E. (2012), Myths about later motherhood. Prepared for the Council on Contemporary Families, July 25, 2012. Fact sheet based upon E. Gregory, Ready: Why Women Are Embracing the New Later Motherhood. New York: Basic Books.
  • Knight, R. P. (1953), The presentation of organized psychoanalysis in the United States. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2: 197–221.
  • Kohut, H. (1959), Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis: An examination of the relationship between mode of observation and theory. In: The Search for the Self, ed. P. Orenstein, Vol 1. New York: Universities Press, pp. 205–232.
  • _____. (1971), The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. New York: International Universities Press.
  • _____. (1977), The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Leon, I. G. (2010), Understanding and treating infertility: Psychoanalytic considerations. J. Academy of Psychoanal. and Dynamic Psychiat., 38(1): 47–75.
  • Lester E. P. (1995), A surrogate carries a fertilised ovum: Multiple crossings in ego boundaries. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 76: 325–334.
  • Lichtenberg, J. D. (2011), Procreation—A discussion. Psychoanalytic Inq., 31: 430–433.
  • Louis C. S. (2015, December 23), Study on in vitro birth says persistence can pay off. The New York Times, p. 3.
  • Mroz, J. (2011, September 5), One sperm donor, 150 offspring. The New York Times, p. D1.
  • Notman, M. T. (2011), Some thoughts about the psychological issues related to assisted reproductive technology. Psychoanal. Inq., 31: 380–391.
  • Readings, J., L. Blake, P. Casey, V. Jadva, & S. Golombok. (2011), Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: Decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reproductive BioMedicine [Online], 22: 485–495.
  • Rosen, A. (2002), Binewski’s family: A primer for psychoanalytic treatment of infertility patients. Contemp. Psychoanal., 38: 345–370.
  • Samish, C. (2006), Alternative pathways to parenthood. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 54: 1241–1244.
  • Vigneri, M. (2012), Children who come in from the cold: On infertile women and the new frontiers in procreation. Italian Psychoanal. Annual, 6: 143–167.
  • Waichler, I. (2011), Growing Concerns about Non Regulation of Donors. New York: Amer. Fertility Assoc.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1960), The theory of the infant-parent relationship. In: Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 37–55.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.