The Primary Process: Bridges to Interdisciplinary Studies of Mind

References

• Bateson, M., S. Healy, & T. Hurly. (2002), Irrational choices in hummingbird foraging behaviour. Animal Behav., 63: 587–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, S. Healy, & T. Hurly. (2003), Context-dependent foraging decisions in rufous hummingbirds. Proc. Royal Soc. of London, Series B, 240: 1271–1276.
   Google Scholar
• Bazan, A., K. Van Draege, L. DeKrock, P. Geerardyn, H. Shevrin, & L. A. W. Brakel. (2013), Empirical evidence for primary process mentation in acute psychosis. Psychoanal. Psychol., 30: 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Brakel, L. A. W. (1984), Truth and Interpretation. Oxford, UK : Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• ———. (2001), Phantasies, neurotic-beliefs, and beliefs-proper. Amer. J. Psychoanal., 61: 363–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ———. (2002), Phantasy and wish: A proper function account for human a-rational primary process mediated mentation. Australasian J. Philos., 80: 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. (2004), The psychoanalytic assumption of the primary process. Extra-psychoanalytic evidence and findings. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 52: 1131–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. (2009), Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and the A-Rational Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. (2010), Unconscious Knowledge and Other Essays in Psycho-Philosophical Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2015), Two fundamental problems for philosophical psychoanalysis. In: Philosophy, Science and Psychoanalysis, eds. S. Boag, L. A. W. Brakel, & V. Talvitie. London: Karnac Books, pp. 119–143.
   Google Scholar
• ———, S. Kleinsorge, M. Snodgrass, & H. Shevrin. (2000), The primary process and the unconscious: Experimental evidence supporting two psychoanalytic presuppositions. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 81: 553–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, & H. Shevrin. (2003), Freud’s dual process theory and the place of the a-rational. Continuing commentary on Stanovich & West (2001). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behav. and Brain Sc., 23: 645–666. Behav. and Brain Sci., 26: 527–528.
   Google Scholar
• _____, & H. Shevrin. (2005), Anxiety, attributional thinking, and the primary process. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 86: 1679–1693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, H. Shevrin, & K. Villa. (2002), The priority of primary process categorization: Experimental evidence supporting a psychoanalytic developmental hypothesis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 50: 483–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucci, W. (1997), Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Science. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., V. Lakshminarayanan, & L. Santos. (2006), How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. J. Polit. Econ., 114: 517–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, S. E., & L. A. W. Brakel. (2014), The primary processes: A preliminary exploration of a-rational mentation from an evolutionary viewpoint. Psychoanal. Inq., 34: 792–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (1980), Actions and Events. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• ———. (1984), Truth and Interpretation. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, C., A. Liekens, L. Bingle, C. Beck, T. Lenser, D. Steckel, & J. Rowe. (2009), Molecular circuits for associative learning in single-celled organisms. J. Royal Soc. Interface, 6: 463–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1900), The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition, 4 & 5. London: Hogarth Press, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J., D. Kimeldorf, & R. Koelling. (1955), Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science, 122: 157–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlick, D., D. Gant, L. A. W. Brakel, & A. Blaisdell. (2011), Attributional and relational processing in pigeons. Front. Compar. Psych., 2: 14–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendler, T. S. (2009), Belief and alief. J. Philos., 105: 634–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, G. (1997), Bayes and beyond. Philos. of Sci., 64: 191–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, R. (1989), Freud Reappraised. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, K. (1935), Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels [The Companion in the Bird’s World]. J. fiir Ornithologie, 83: 137–213, 289–413.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, B., & A. Kacelnik. (2002), Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 99: 3352–3355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. (1978), Primary and secondary process in the context of cerebral hemisphere specialization. Psychoanal. Quart., 47: 237–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin, D., R. Goldstone, & D. Gentner. (1990), Similarity involving attributes and relations: Judgments of similarity and differences are not inverses. Psychol. Sci., 1: 64–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, R. Goldstone, & D. Gentner. (1993), Respects for similarity. Psychol. Rev., 100: 254–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesse, R., & G. Williams. (1994), Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Noy, P. (1979), The psychoanalytic study of cognitive development. Psychoanal. Study of Child, 34: 169–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosati, A., & J. Stevens. (2009), Rational decisions: The adaptive nature of context-dependent choice. In: Rational Animals, Irrational Humans, eds. S. Watanabe, A. Blaisdell, L. Huber, & A. Young. Tokyo: Keio University Press, pp. 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Shafir, S., T. Waite, & B. Smith. (2002), Context-dependent violations of rational choice in honeybees and gray jays. Behav. Ecol. and Sociobio., 51: 180–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, D. (2000), The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, T. (2001), Intransitive preferences in hoarding gray jays. Behav. Ecol. and Sociobio., 50: 116–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar