References
- Aron, L. (1992), Interpretation as expression of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanal. Dial., 2: 475–507.
- Aron, L.. (2003), The paradoxical place of enactment in psychoanalysis: Introduction. Psychoanal. Dial., 13: 623–631.
- Atwood, G., & R. Stolorow. (1984), Structures of Subjectivity: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Phenomenology. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
- Benjamin, J. (2000), Intersubjective distinctions: Subjects and persons, recognitions and breakdowns: Commentary on paper by Gerhardt, Sweetnam, and Barton. Psychoanal. Dial., 10: 43–56.
- Bowlby, J. (1960), Separation anxiety. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 41: 89–113.
- Buechler, S. (2002), More simply human than otherwise. Contemp. Psychoanal., 38: 485–497.
- Davies, J. (1999), Getting cold feet, defining “safe-enough” borders: Dissociation, multiplicity and integration in the analyst’s experience. Psychoanal. Quart., 68: 184–208.
- Davis, M., & D. Wallbridge. (1981), Boundary and Space: An Introduction to the Work of D.W. Winnicott. London, UK: Routledge, 2018.
- Frank, K. A. (2004), The analyst’s trust and therapeutic action. Psychoanal. Quart., 73: 335–378.
- Freud, S. (1940), An outline of psycho-analysis. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 21: 27–84.
- Ghent, E. (2002), Wish, need, drive: Motive in the light of dynamic systems theory and Edelman’s selectionist theory. Psychoanal. Dial., 12: 763–808.
- Greenberg, J. (1991), Oedipus and Beyond: A Clinical Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Greenberg, J. R. (1986), Theoretical models and the analyst’s neutrality. Contemp. Psychoanal., 22: 87–106.
- Greenson, J. R. (1965), The working alliance and the transference neurosis. Psychoanal. Quart., 34: 155–181.
- Hart, A. H. (2006), Danger and safety: The analyst as analytic subject. Internat. Forum Psychoanal., 15: 220–225.
- Hartmann, H. (1939), Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York, NY: International Universities Press, Inc.
- Hartmann, H., E. Kris, & R. M. Loewenstein. (1949), Notes on the theory of aggression. Psychoanal. Study of Child, 3: 9–36.
- Hirsch, I. (2008), Coasting in The Countertransference. New York, NY: The Analytic Press.
- Hoffman, I. (1998), Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process: A Dialectical-Constructivist View. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
- Kafka, H. (1998), Fear in the countertransference and the mutuality of safety. Internat. Forum Psychoanal., 7: 97–103.
- Levy, S. T., & L. B. Inderbitzin. (1997), Safety, danger, and the analyst’s authority. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 45: 377–394.
- Lichtenberg, J., F. Lachmann, & J. Fosshage. (1991), The Clinical Exchange. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
- Meares, R. (2005), The Metaphor of Play: Origins and Breakdown of Personal Being. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Mitchell, S. A. (1997), Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
- Ogden, T. H. (2004), The analytic third. Psychoanal. Quart., 73(1): 167–195.
- Pine, F. (1985), Developmental Theory and Clinical Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Pizer, B. (2003), When the crunch is a (K)not: A crimp in relational dialogue. Psychoanal. Dial., 13: 171–192.
- Pizer, S. A. (2004), Impasse recollected in tranquility. Psychoanal. Dial., 14(3): 289–311.
- Racker, H. (1961), Transference and countertransference. In: The International Psycho-Analytical Library, Vol. 73. London, UK: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1988, pp. 1–196.
- Ringstrom, P. A. (1998), Therapeutic impasses in contemporary psychoanalytic treatment: Revisiting the double bind hypothesis. Psychoanal. Dial., 8: 297–315.
- Ringstrom, P. A.. (2003), “Crunches,” “(k)nots,” and double binds—When what isn’t happening is the most important thing: Commentary of paper by Barbara Pizer. Psychoanal. Dial., 13: 193–205.
- Ringstrom, P. A.. (2007), Scenes that write themselves: Improvisational moments in relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dial., 17: 69–99.
- Sandler, J. (1960), The background of safety. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 41: 352–356.
- Schafer, R. (1983), The Analytic Attitude. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Segalla, R. (2013), Panel report: Safety for analysand, safety for the analyst, and safety for the dyad. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 61: 993–1000.
- Slade, A. (2014), Imagining fear: Attachment, threat, and psychic experience. Psychoanal. Dial., 24(3): 253–266.
- Stolorow, R. D., & G. E. Atwood. (1992), Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Life. New York, NY: The Analytic Press.
- Sullivan, H. S. (1953), The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
- Winnicott, D. W. (1963), Dependence in infant-care, in child-care, and in psychoanalytic setting. In: The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, ed. M. Masud & R. Khan. New York, NY: International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 249–259.
- Winnicott, D. W.. (1969), The use of an object. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 50: 711–716.
- Winnicott, D. W.. (1971), Playing and Reality. New York, NY: Basic Books.