The Origins of Modern Literary Theory in the Repudiation of Autobiographical Readings of Shakespeare’s Sonnets

References

• Abenheimer, K. M. (1946). Shakespeare’s Tempest: A psychological analysis. first published in 1963. In reprinted in M.D. Faber (Ed.), The design within: Psychoanalytic approaches to Shakespeare. Science House.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, R. (1989). The pleasures of reading in an ideological age. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. (2005). Shakespeare by another name: A biography of Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford, the man who was Shakespeare. Gotham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1589). Arte of English poesie. Richard Field.
   Google Scholar
• Bevington, D. (2004). The complete works of Shakespeare (5th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, S. (1987). Disowning knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, E. (2021). Article on Susan Herbert. In Oxford dictionary of national biography (online). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. (2022, December 1). Exaggerated ambitions. London Review of Books. Review of John Guillory, Professing criticism.
   Google Scholar
• Dante, A. (1294). La vita nuova.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, R. (2016). Shakespeare, court dramatist. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, D. (2013). The truth about William Shakespeare: Fact, fiction and modern biographies. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, A. (2020, April 27). Majority of authors “hear” their characters speak, finds study. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, M. (2004). Shakespeare after all. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, M. (2021). Character: The history of a cultural obsession. Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, R. (1982). The book known as Q: A consideration of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Green, N. (2009). The fall of the house of Oxford. Brief Chronicles, 1, 41–95.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. G. (2010). Shakespeare and literary theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hazlitt, W. (1817). Characters of Shakespeare’s plays. Reynell. (Amazon: Kindle edition).
   Google Scholar
• Holland, N. (1970). Romeo’s dream and the paradox of literary realism. First published in 1963. In reprinted in M.D. Faber (ed.), The design within: Psychoanalytic approaches to Shakespeare (p. 51). Science House.
   Google Scholar
• James, H. (1999). Major stories and essays. Library of America.
   Google Scholar
• James, S. E. (2021). Entry on Katherine Parr. In Oxford dictionary of national biography. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, H. (2021, May 7). Review of Ben Hutchinson, The midlife mind. Times Literary Supplement.
   Google Scholar
• Kindley, E. (2021, March 25). The people we know best. New York Review of Books. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Knights, L. C. (1933). How many children had Lady Macbeth? Minority Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamotte, A. (1995). Bird by bird: Some instructions on writing and life. Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (1898). Article on William Shakespeare in Dictionary of national biography.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (1905). Introduction to Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melzer, A. M. (2017). Philosophy between the lines: The lost history of esoteric writing. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moraitis, G. (1984). Models as vehicles of transference: Observations from biographical studies. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 4(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351698409533534
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. C. (1997). Wriothesley’s resistance: Wardship practices, and Ovidian narratives in Shakespeare’s Venus and Adonis. In Kolin, P. C. (Ed.), Venus and Adonis: Critical essays (pp. 323–340). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. (2003). Monstrous adversary: The life of Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, M. (2003). The anonymous renaissance: Cultures of discretion in Tudor-Stuart England. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogburn, C., & Ogburn, D. (1952). This star of England: “William Shakespeare” Man of the renaissance. Coward-McCann.
   Google Scholar
• Price, D. (2001). The unauthorized biography of William Shakespeare. Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rollins, H. E. (1944). New variorum edition of Shakespeare sonnets, Vol. II. Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Saler, M. (2021, March 12). Making something of ourselves: The of character, and how we shape it. Times Literary Supplement.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, J. (Ed.). (1999). Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Critical essays. Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Schurink, F. (2006). An unnoticed early reference to Shakespeare. Notes & Queries, 53(1), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/notesj/gjj136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Showalter, E. (2021, June 25). Review of Bair’s Parisian lives. Times Literary Supplement.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. (2019). This is Shakespeare. Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. P. (1933). On reading Shakespeare. Chautaqua Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streitberger, W. R. (2016). The masters of the revels and Elizabeth I's court theatre. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vendler, H. (1997). The art of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vicars, T. (1628). Cheiragogia Manuductio ad Artem Rhetoricam (3rd ed.). Augustini Matthews.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, A. (2021, July 9). Life outside the window. Times Literary Supplement.
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (1973). The intellectual relationship between Nietzsche and Freud. Psychiatry, 36(4), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1973.11023778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (1975). The Tempest: Aesthetic pleasure and the psychology of the audience [Unpublished paper presented at Sheppard Pratt Hospital Scientific Day].
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (2009). A psychoanalytic study of Edward de Vere’s The Tempest. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 37(4), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.2009.37.4.627
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (2010a). The bisexuality of Shakespeare’s Sonnets and implications for de Vere’s Authorship. The Psychoanalytic Review, 97(5), 857–879. https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2010.97.5.857
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (2010b). The arte of English poesie: The case for Edward de Vere’s authorship. Brief Chronicles, 2, 121–141.
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (2013). Betrayal in the life of Edward de Vere, in the plays of Shakespeare, and in Sonnet 121. In S. Akhtar (Ed.), Betrayal: Developmental, Clinical, and Literary Realms (pp. 83–97). Karnac Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (2017a). An unpublished letter by Sigmund Freud on the Shakespeare authorship question. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 39(2), 148–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01062301.2017.1312072
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (2017b). A possible source for Richard III’s prophetic nightmare in Guicciardini. Notes & Queries, 64(2), 265–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/notesj/gjx058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (2017c). Othello and the green-eyed monster of jealousy. The Oxfordian, 19, 115–128.
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (2018). Did Edward de Vere translate Ovid’s Metamorphoses? The Oxfordian, 20, 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (2020). Is Falstaff a portrait of the historical Henry VIII? The Oxfordian, 22, 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (2021). Did Oxford translate Boccaccio’s Decameron into English? The Oxfordian, 23, 243–266.
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M. (in press). Psychological complexity in Shakespeare. In Stone, J. & Newlin, J. (Eds.), New psychoanalytic readings of Shakespeare: Cool reason and seething brains. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, R. M., & Stritmatter, R. (2009). Who was “William Shakespeare”? We propose he was Edward de Vere. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 32(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01062301.2009.10592653
   Google Scholar
• Wells, S. (2012). In Last will and testament. Documentary film. L. and L. Williams, directors.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, R. F. (1994). Shakespeare—Who was he? The Oxford challenge to the bard of Avon. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Whittemore, H. (2016). 100 Reasons Shake-speare was the Earl of Oxford. Forever Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wildenthal, B. (2019). Early Shakespeare authorship doubts. Zindabad Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, E. (2023). Shakespeare was a woman and other heresies: How doubting the bard became the biggest taboo in literature. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar