290
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Negotiating the (legal) right to the city: Public housing demolition and the federal courts in two postindustrial U.S. cities

References

  • Aldridge, K. (2003, March 1). English Woods tenants: Problems, but it’s home. They say troubles don’t justify destroying complex. The Cincinnati Enquirer, p. 1.
  • Anderson, et al. v. Jackson, et al., C. No: 06-3298 (E.D. Louisiana) 2007
  • Arroyo Vista Tenants Association v. City of Dublin, No. C 07-05794 MHP. ( N.D. Cal. February 2008)
  • Attoh, K. A. (2011). What kind of right is the right to the city? Progress in Human Geography, 35, 669–685.
  • Benavides, et al. v. Housing Authority of the City of San Antonio, et al., 238 F.3d 667 (5th Cir. 2001)
  • Burke, T. F. (2002). Lawyers, lawsuits, and legal rights: The battle over litigation in American society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Cisneros, H., & Engdahl, L. (2009). From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Concerned Tenants Association of Father Panik Village, et al. v. Pierce, et al., No. 87 Civ. 809, 685F. Supp. 316 (D. Conn. 1988)
  • Curnutte, M. (1999, August 31). $35 M housing grant expected. The Cincinnati Enquirer, p. 1.
  • deCourcy Hinds, M. (1992, January 5). Pennsylvania city hopes it’s bouncing back from the bottom. The New York Times, p. A14.
  • Dessin, et al. v. Housing Authority of the City of Fort Myers, et al., No. 90 Civ. 232, 783F. Supp. 587 (M.D. Fla. 1990)
  • Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Edwards, et al. v. District of Columbia, et al., No. 85 Civ. 6150, 821 F.2d 651 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  • English Woods Civic Association/Resident Community Council v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority, et al., Civ. Case No. 1:03-cv-186 ( S.D. Ohio 2004)
  • Fernades, E. (2007). Constructing the right to the city in Brazil. Social & Legal Studies, 16, 201–219.
  • Freeney, et al. v. Sanford Housing Authority, et al., Orlando No. 6:2010cv01920 (M.D. Fla. 2011)
  • Givens, et al. v. Butler Metropolitan Housing Authority, No. 1:03-cv-00502 (S.D. Ohio 2006)
  • Goetz, E. G. (2013). New Deal ruins: Race, economic justice, and public housing policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Gomez, et al. v. Housing Authority of El Paso, et al., Civ. No. EP-91-CA-30, 805F. Supp. 1363 (W.D. Tex. 1992)
  • Gorenstein, N. (1994, June 3). Court to run Chester housing; a receiver will be named by a federal judge; the goal is to improve run-down public housing. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. 105.
  • Hackworth, J. (2005). Progressive activism in a neoliberal context: The case of efforts to retain public housing in the United States. Studies in Political Economy, 24, 29–51.
  • Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Hardy, D. (1990, May 20). Chester begins inspecting all of its public housing. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. 18-D2.
  • Hardy, D. (1991, October 31). Receiver sought for Chester housing. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. 27-D.
  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: from the right to the city to the urban revolution. London, England: Verso Books.
  • Hearne, R. (2013). Realising the ‘right to the city’: Developing a human rights based framework for regeneration of areas of urban disadvantage. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 5, 172–187.
  • Henry Horner Mother’s Guild, et al. v. The Chicago Housing Authority, et al., No. 91 Civ. 3316, 824F. Supp. 808 (N.D. III 1993)
  • Holin, M. J., Buron, L., Locke, G., & Cortes, A. (2003). Interim assessment of the HOPE VI program cross-site report. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
  • Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1437 (1937).
  • Hyra, D. S. (2008). The new urban renewal: The economic transformation of Harlem and Bronzeville. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lee, J. A. (2015). Rights at risk in privatized public housing. Tulsa Law Review, 50, 759–803.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1996). The right to the city. In E. Kofman & E. Lebas (Trans. & Eds.), Writings on Cities (pp. 63–181). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Lepofsky, J., & Fraser, J. C. (2003). Building community citizens: Claiming the right to place-making in the city. Urban Studies, 40, 127–142.
  • Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 (1980)
  • Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13, 185–197.
  • Medonsa et al. v. Lowell Housing Authority No. 01-2034C ( Mass. Super. Ct. Suffolk Count 2005)
  • Melnick, R. S. (1994). Between the lines: Interpreting welfare rights. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Mitchell, D., & Heynen, N. (2009). The geography of survival and the right to the city: Speculations on surveillance, legal innovation, and the criminalization of intervention. Urban Geography, 30, 611–632.
  • National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing. (1992). Final report of National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Ohio Urban Revitalization Task Force. (2000). Ohio urban revitalization: Policy agenda & task force report. Columbus, OH: Office of the Governor.
  • Paris, M. (2006). The politics of rights: Then and now. Law & Social Inquiry, 31, 999–1034.
  • Pattillo, M. E. (2007). Black on the block: The politics of race and class in the city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Peale, C. (2000, August 13). Pumping life and lives into cities’ neighborhoods. The Cincinnati Enquirer, pp. 49–50.
  • Pennsylvania Crime Commission. (1990). Organized crime in Pennsylvania: A decade of change [Report]. Conshohocken, PA: Author.
  • Powell, J. C. (1995). De facto demolition: The hidden deterioration of public housing. Catholic University Law Review, 44, 885–934.
  • Project B.A.S.I.C. v. Kemp, et al., No. 89 C.A. 0248, 721F. Supp. 1501 (D.R.I. 1989)
  • Purcell, M. (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141–154.
  • Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1437p (1998).
  • Rast, J. (2006). Governing the regimeless city: The Frank Zeidler administration in Milwaukee, 1948–1960. Urban Affairs Review, 42(1), 81–122.
  • Reich, C. A. (1964). The new property. Yale Law Journal, 73, 733–787.
  • Reese, et al. v. Miami–Dade County, et al., Case No. 01-3766-civ-hurley (S.D. Fla. 2009)
  • Richman, K. (2002). Lovers, legal strangers, and parents: Negotiating parental and sexual identity in family law. Law & Society Review, 36, 285–324.
  • Rouse, J., & Maxwell, D. O. (1998). A decent place to live: The report of the National Housing Task Force. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
  • Samara, T. R., Sinha, A., & Brady, M. (2013). Putting the “public” back in affordable housing: Place and politics in the era of poverty deconcentration. Cities, 35, 319–326.
  • Scheingold, S. (2004). The politics of rights: Lawyers, public policy, and social change. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Shklar, J. N. (1964). Legalism: law, morals, and political trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shortell, C. (2015). Urban, state, and federal regimes in local politics: The role of the judiciary. Portland, OR: Portland State University.
  • Silverstein, G. (2010). Law’s allure in American politics and policy: What it is, what it is not, and what it might yet be. Law & Social Inquiry, 35, 1077–1097.
  • Slobodzian, J. A. (1994, April 30). Chester, U.S. faulted for housing ills; their neglect amounted to ‘de facto demolition,’ a judge ruled; a remedy was not specified. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. 1.
  • Staeheli, L., & Mitchell, D. (2008). The people’s property?: Power, politics and the public. London, England: Routledge.
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Steensland, B. (2008). The failed welfare revolution: America’s struggle over guaranteed income policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tarrow, S. (2010). The strategy of paired comparison: toward a theory of practice. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 230–259.
  • Tinsley, et al. v. Kemp, et al., No. 89 Civ. 0023, 750F. Supp. 1001 (W.D. Mo. 1990)
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). Total population, population by race and poverty status, 1980–2000. Prepared by Social Explorer. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
  • Valverde, M. (2012). Everyday law on the street: City governance in an age of diversity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Velez, et al. v. Cisneros, et al., No. 90 Civ. 6449, 850F. Supp. 1257 (E.D. Pa. 1994)
  • Venkatesh, S. A. (2009). American project: The rise and fall of a modern ghetto. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wolf, E. (1982). Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Wyly, E. K., & Hammel, D. J. (1999). Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 711–771.
  • Zemans, F. K. (1983). Legal mobilization: The neglected role of the law in the political system. American Political Science Review, 77, 690–703.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.