Assessing the impact of area-based initiatives in deprived neighborhoods: The example of S. João de Deus in Porto, Portugal

References

• Aalbers, M., & Van Beckhoven, E. (2010). The integrated approach in neighborhood renewal: More than just a philosophy? Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 101, 449–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, S. (2008). A diferença que a participação faz em iniciativas de regeneração urbana [The difference that participation in urban regeneration initiatives makes]. Sociedade e Território, 41, 8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, S. (2010). O Social, o Espacial e o Político na Pobreza e na Exclusão—Avaliação de iniciativas de regeneração de áreas urbanas ‘em risco’ na cidade do Porto [The social, the spatial and the political in poverty and exclusion: Evaluation of urban regeneration initiatives in urban deprived areas in Porto] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais, Lisbon University, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, S. (2012). The patterns of unemployment and the geography of social housing. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 71, 759–767.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, S. (2015). Welfare state changes and outcomes: The cases of Portugal and Denmark from a comparative perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 49(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, S., & Andersen, H. T. (2015, June–July). Social housing in Portugal and Denmark: A comparative perspective. Paper presented at ENHR 2015 Housing and Cities in a time of change: Are we focusing on people?, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, H. T., Dimitrova, E., & Schmeidler, K. (2013). Urban knowledge and large housing estates in Europe. In H. T. Andersen & R. Atkinson (Eds.), Production and use of urban knowledge (pp. 103–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K. (2004). From stigma to demolition: Australian debates about housing and social exclusion. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19, 255–270.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, G., & van Kempen, R. (2010). Dispersal patterns of households who are forced to move: Desegregation by demolition: A case study of Dutch cities. Housing Studies, 25, 159–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunyan, P. (2014). Regenerating the city: People, politics, power and the public sphere. Local Government Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03003930.2014.982109
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. (2006). Addressing Europe’s urban challenges: Lessons from the EU URBAN Community Initiative. Urban Studies, 43, 2145–2162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cars, G., Healey, P., Madanipour, A., & Magalhães, C. (2002). Urban governance, institutional capacity and social milieux. London, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., & Kearns, A. (2012). Housing improvements, perceived housing quality and psychosocial benefits from the home. Housing Studies, 27, 915–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., & van Kempen, R. (2008). Places and participation: Comparing residential participation in post-WWII neighbourhoods in northwest, central and southern Europe. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(1), 63–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2003). Avaliação Intercalar do Programa de Iniciativa Comunitária Urban II de Porto–Gondomar [Interim evaluation of the Community Initiative Programme Urban II Porto–Gondomar]. Porto, Portugal: Deloitte.
   Google Scholar
• Direção Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional. (2001). Programa de Iniciativa Comunitária URBAN II 2000–2006 Porto–Gondomar [Community Initiative Programme URBAN II 2000–2006 Porto–Gondomar]. Lisbon, Portugal: Ministério do Planeamento.
   Google Scholar
• ECOTEC. (2010a). Ex-post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes 2000–06: The URBAN Community Initiative. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/urbanii/final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECOTEC. (2010b). URBAN II evaluation case study: Porto Gondomar—An isolated success story? Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/urbanii/case_studies/porto_gondomar.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Engberg, L. A., & Larsen, J. N. (2010). Context-orientated meta-governance in Danish urban regeneration. Planning Theory & Practice, 11, 549–571.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1999). The MEANS collection. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2003). Partnership with the cities—The URBAN Community Initiative. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). EVALSED: The resource for the evaluation of socio-economic development. Brussels, Belgium: DG for Regional Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, L. (1998). O sítio das drogas. Etnografia das drogas numa periferia urbana [The site of drugs. Ethnography of drugs in an urban periphery]. Lisbon, Portugal: Editorial Notícias.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, L., & Ramos, A. (2010). Exclusão social e violências quotidianas em “bairros degradados”: Etnografia das drogas numa periferia urbana [Social exclusion and daily violence in “slums”: Ethnography of drugs in an urban periphery]. Revista Toxicodependências, 16(2), 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrão, J. (1996). A avaliação comunitária de programas regionais: Aspetos de uma experiência recente [Community assessment of regional programs: Aspects of a recent experience]. Sociologia - Problemas e Práticas, 22, 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrão, J., & Mourato, J. (2011). Evaluation and spatial planning in Portugal: From legal requirement to source of policy-learning and institutional innovation. In J. F. Dasí (Ed.), De la evaluación ambiental estratégica a la evaluación de impacto territorial: reflexiones acerca de la tarea de evaluación [Strategic environmental assessment to the territorial impact assessment: Reflections on the assessment task] (pp. 141–166). València, Spain: Universitat de València.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1987). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London, England: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2013). How planners deal with uncomfortable knowledge: The dubious ethics of the American Planning Association. Cities, 32, 157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2011). Where have all the towers gone? The dismantling of public housing in U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33, 267–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, V. K. (2008). Regenerating communities: Women’s experiences of urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 45, 607–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotham, K. F. (2003). Toward an understanding of the spatiality of urban poverty: The urban poor as spatial actors. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, 723–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra, I. (2002). Fundamentos e processos de uma sociologia de acção—O planeamento em ciências sociais. Lisbon, Portugal: Principia.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R., & Thomas, H. (1995). Urban policy evaluation—Challenge and change. London, England: Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, L., & Mooney, G. (2013). “Welfare ghettos” and the “broken society”: Territorial stigmatization in the contemporary UK. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(1), 46–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning. London, England: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., Cars, G., Madanipour, A., & Magalhães, C. (2002). Transforming governance, institutionalist analysis and institutional capacity. In G. Cars, P. Healey, A. Madanipour, & C. Magalhães (Eds.), Urban governance, institutional capacity and social milieux (pp. 6–28) London, England: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. Q., & Christensen, A. (2012). Territorial stigmatization and local belonging: A study of the Danish neighbourhood Aalborg East. City, 16(1–2), 74–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, A., & Mason, P. (2015). Regeneration, relocation and health behaviours in deprived communities. Health & Place, 32, 43–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, A., & Parkinson, M. (2001). The significance of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38, 2103–2110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klecun, E., & Cornford, T. (2005). A critical approach to evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 229–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, P. (2012). Can area-based regeneration programmes ever work? Evidence from England’s New Deal for Communities Programme. Policy Studies, 33, 313–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobao, L., Hooks, G., & Tickamyer, A. (2007). The sociology of spatial inequality. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michalski, A. (2012). Social welfare and levels of democratic government in the EU. Journal of European Integration, 34, 397–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murie, A., & Musterd, S. (2004). Social exclusion and opportunity structures in European cities and neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 41, 1441–1459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parés, M., Bonet-Martí, J., & Martí-Costa, M. (2012). Does participation really matter in urban regeneration policies? Exploring governance networks in Catalonia (Spain). Urban Affairs Review, 48, 238–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, S., Rees, G., & Taylor, C. (2005). New Labour and educational disadvantage: The limits of area‐based initiatives. London Review of Education, 3, 101–116.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L. (2013). Hitting the target but missing the point: The case of area-based regeneration. Community Development, 44, 617–634.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, A. (2011). Learning from the past? A review of approaches to spatial targeting in urban policy. Planning Theory and Practice, 12, 331–348.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J., Tyler, P., & Brennan, A. (2005). Assessing the effect of area based initiatives on local area outcomes: Some thoughts based on the national evaluation of the single regeneration budget in England. Urban Studies, 42, 1919–1946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence‐based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, E. (2009). The city and spatial justice. Justice Spatiale/Spatial Justice, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, N., & Smith, P. (2008). Evaluating complex, area-based initiatives in a context of change the experience of the Children’s Fund Initiative. Evaluation, 14(1), 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Spicker, P. (2007). The idea of poverty. London, England: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stame, N. (2004). Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity. Evaluation, 10(1), 58–76.
   Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, P., Atkinson, R., & Baucz, A. (2011). Background report on the urban dimension of the Cohesion Policy post 2013. Warsaw, Poland: Polish EU Presidency.
   Google Scholar
• Turok, I., Kearns, A., & Goodlad, R. (1999). Social exclusion: In what sense a planning problem. Town Planning Review, 70, 663–384.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, P., Warnock, C., Provins, A., & Lanz, B. (2013). Valuing the benefits of urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 50(1), 169–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. (2013). Integration and control: The governing of urban marginality in Western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 1418–1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2007). Territorial stigmatization in the age of advanced marginality. Thesis Eleven, 91(1), 66–77.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2014). Marginality, ethnicity and penality in the neo-liberal city: An analytic cartography. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 1687–1711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L., Slater, T., & Pereira, V. B. (2014). Territorial stigmatization in action. Environment and Planning A, 46, 1270–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassenberg, F. (2011). Demolition in the Bijlmermeer: Lessons from transforming a large housing estate. Building Research & Information, 39, 363–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar