Toward common ground in the U.S. fair housing debate

References

• Anderson, E. (2010). The imperative of integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, W. C. (2008). California’s fair share housing 1967–2004: The planning approach. Journal of Planning History, 7, 48–71.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, B. (1965). Political argument. New York, NY: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (2008). Maximum feasible misdirection: A reply to Imbroscio. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30, 131–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple, K., & Goetz, E. G. (2011). Spatial justice through regionalism? The inside game, the outside game, and the quest for the spatial fix in the United States. Community Development, 42, 458–475.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K. B. (1965). Dark ghetto: Dilemmas of social power. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Collison, R., Ellen, I. G., & Ludwig, J. (2015). Low-income housing policy (Working Paper No. 21071). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Race and Housing. (1958). Where shall we live? Report of the Commission on Race and Housing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, D. M., Glaeser, E. L., & Vigdor, J. L. (1999). The rise and decline of the American ghetto. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 455–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidoff, P. (1983). Decent housing for all: An agenda. In C. Hartman (Ed.), America’s housing crisis: What is to be done? (pp. 186–201). Abingdon, England: Routledge Kegan & Paul.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S., Duncan, G. J., Keels, M., & Mendenhall, R. M. (2010). Gautreaux mothers and their children: An update. Housing Policy Debate, 20, 7–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1973). Opening up the suburbs: An urban strategy for America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2006). The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farley, R. (2008). The Kerner Commission Report plus four decades: What has changed? What has not? (Report 08-656). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. (1987). Equality as a moral ideal. Ethics, 98, 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C. (1990). The great misapprehension: Federal fair housing policy in the eighties. In D. DiPasquale & L. Keyes (Eds.), Building foundations: Housing and federal policy (pp. 137–157). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C. (1992). The case for racial integration. In G. C. Galster & E. W. Hill (Eds.), The metropolis in Black and White: Place, power, and polarization (pp. 270–285). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C. (2002). An economic efficiency analysis of deconcentrating poverty populations. Journal of Housing Economics, 11, 303–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C. (2007). Neighbourhood social mix as a goal of housing policy: A theoretical analysis. European Journal of Housing Policy, 7, 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., & Killen, S. P. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 7–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. (1962). The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian-Americans. New York, NY: Macmillan/The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, J. M. (1986). Housing desegregation and federal policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, J. M., & Feins, J. D. (2003). Choosing a better life: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2003). Clearing the way: Deconcentrating the poor in urban America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2015a). From breaking down barriers to breaking up communities: The expanding spatial strategies of fair housing advocacy. Urban Affairs Review, 51, 820–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2015b). Poverty-pimping CDCs: The search for dispersal’s next bogeyman. Housing Policy Debate, 25, 608–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G., & Chapple, K. (2010). You gotta move: Advancing the debate on the record of dispersal. Housing Policy Debate, 20, 209–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. (2006). Making exclusionary zoning remedies work: How courts applying Title VII standards to fair housing cases have misunderstood the housing market. Yale Law and Policy Review, 24, 437–469.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, C. (1984). The right to stay put. In C. Geisler & F. Popper (Eds.), Land reform, American style (pp. 302–318). Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. R., & Swanstrom, T. (2010, September). Thick injustice and the American metropolis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hyra, D. (2015). The back-to-the-city movement: Neighbourhood redevelopment and processes of political and cultural displacement. Urban Studies, 52, 1753–1773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. (2006). Shaming the inside game: A critique of the liberal expansionist approach to addressing urban problems. Urban Affairs Review, 42, 224–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. (2008). [U]nited and actuated by some common impulse of passion: Challenging the dispersal consensus in American housing policy research. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30, 111–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. (2010). Urban American reconsidered: Alternatives for governance and policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. (2012). Beyond mobility: The limits of liberal urban policy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, D. W. (1994). The suburban racial dilemma: Housing and neighborhoods. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, community, and culture. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. (1990). Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Listokin, D. (1976). Fair share housing allocation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. (1968). Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Urban Problems. (1968). Building the American city. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, M., Stancil, W., Luce, T., & Myott, E. (2015). High costs and segregation in subsidized housing policy. Housing Policy Debate, 25, 574–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polikoff, A. (1986). Sustainable Integration or inevitable resegregation: The troubling questions. In J. M. Goering (Ed.), Housing desegregation and federal policy (pp. 43–71). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. A. (2002). Opportunity-based housing. Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law, 12, 188–228.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, D. (2001). The “segregation tax”: The cost of racial segregation to Black homeowners. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Program on Metropolitan Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Saltman, J. (1971). Open housing as a social movement: Challenge, conflict and change. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (1999). What “community” supplies. In R. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp. 241–292). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (2006). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York, NY: W.W.Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. F. (2014). Housing policy in the United States (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (1970). The uses of disorder: Personal identity and city life. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. E. (1993). Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (1991). Preferences and politics. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20, 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., No. 13-1371, 576 U.S. ___, slip op. at 23. (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A. (2017). Beyond people versus place: A place-conscious framework for investing in housing and neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 27, 306–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1995). Fair housing planning guide. Volume 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2015, July). 24 CFR Parts 5, 91, 92, 570, 574, 576, and 903. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, Final Rule. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of the Secretary.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2010). Housing and community development grants: HUD needs to enhance its requirements and oversight of jurisdictions’ fair housing plans. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• von Hoffman, A. (1998). Like fleas on a tiger? A brief history of the open housing movement (W98-3). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Joint Center for Housing Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, S. (1998). Liberalism, perfectionism, and restraint. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wilen, W., & Stasell, W. (2000). Gautreaux and Chicago’s public housing crisis: The conflict between achieving integration and providing decent housing for very low-income African Americans. Clearinghouse Review, 34, 117–145.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yinger, J. (1995). Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar