Is it all in the eye of the beholder? Benefits of living in mixed-income neighborhoods in New York and Los Angeles

References

• Alba, R. D., & Logan, J. R. (1991). Variations on two themes: Racial and ethnic patterns in the attainment of suburban residence. Demography, 28, 431–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba, R. D., Logan, J. R., & Stults, B. J. (2000). The changing neighborhood contexts of the immigrant metropolis. Social Forces, 79, 587–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba, R. D., Logan, J. R., Stults, B. J., Marzan, G., & Zhang, W. (1999). Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review, 64, 446–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Apgar, W., & A. Calder. (2005). The dual mortgage market: The persistance of discrimination in mortgage lending. In X. Briggs (Ed.), The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America (pp. 101–126). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Been, V., Ellen, I., & Madar, J. (2008). The high cost of segregation: Exploring racial disparities in high-cost lending. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 36, 361–393.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., Smith, J. L., & Wright, P. A. (2006). Where are poor people to live? Transforming public housing communities. Milton Park, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berube, A. (2006). Comment on Mark Joseph's “Is mixed‐income development an antidote to urban poverty?” Housing Policy Debate, 17, 235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Betancur, J. J. (1996). The settlement experience of Latinos in Chicago: Segregation, speculation, and the ecology model. Social Forces, 74, 1299–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowdler, J. (2005). Jeopardizing Hispanic homeownership: Predatory practices in the homebuying market (Issue Brief No. 15). Retrieved from National Council of La Raza Website: http://publications.nclr.org/bitstream/handle/123456789/1072/31596_file_IB_15_Predatory_Lending.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (Ed.). (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. J. (2010). The economics and ethics of mixed communities: Exploring the philosophy of integration through the lens of the subprime financial crisis in the U.S. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2010). Building “community” in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches, and early experiences. Urban Affairs Review, 45, 299–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2015). The enduring significance of race in mixed-income communities (The University of Chicago School of Social Service Administration & Case Western Reserve University Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences Research Brief No. 10). Retrieved https://gallery.mailchimp.com/90054719b11d39adfa348e50f/files/Race_in_Mixed_Income_Developments_Research_Brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros, H., & Engdahl, L. (Eds.). (2009). From despair to hope: Hope VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. A., & Ledwith, V. (2007). How much does income matter in neighborhood choice? Population Research and Policy Review, 26(2), 145–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, K. (2000). The racial context of White mobility: An individual-level assessment of The white flight hypothesis. Social Science Research, 29, 223–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deluca, S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2010). Residential mobility, neighborhood and poverty: Results from the Chicago Gautreaux Program and Moving to Opportunity Experiment. In C. Hartman & G. Squires (Eds.), The integration debate: Competing futures for American cities (pp. 185–198). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, N. A. (2010). From segregation to integration: How do we get there? In C. Hartman & G. Squires (Eds.), The integration debate: Competing futures for American cities (pp. 23–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerardi, K., & Willen, P. (2009). Subprime mortgages, foreclosures, and urban neighborhoods. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 9, 1935–1682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2003). Clearing the way: Deconcentrating the poor in urban America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, Pub. L. No. 94-200, 89 Stat. 1124 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, J., Hankinson, M., & Brown, K. S. (2015). Racial and spatial targeting: Segregation and subprime lending within and across metropolitan areas. Social Forces, 93, 1081–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iceland, J. (2004). The multigroup entropy index (also known as Theil’s H or the information theory index). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/housing/patterns/about/multigroup_entropy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Iceland, J., & Wilkes, R. (2006). Does socioeconomic status matter? Race, class, and residential segregation. Social Problems, 53, 248–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A. (2009). Immigrants and neighbourhoods of concentrated poverty: Assimilation or stagnation? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35, 1129–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42, 369–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, W., & Cromartie, J. (2004). New patterns of Hispanic settlement in rural America (Rural Development Research Report #99). Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/rdrr99/19309_rdrr99_1_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J., Laakso, J., Stevens, C., & Tashiro, C. (2013). Ethnically diverse HOPE VI redevelopments: A community case study from the Pacific Northwest. Cityscape, 15(2), 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Khare, A. T., Joseph, M. L., & Chaskin, R. J. (2015). The enduring significance of race in mixed-income developments. Urban Affairs Review, 51, 474–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., Alba, R. D., & Leung, S. Y. (1996). Minority access to White suburbs: A multiregional comparison. Social Forces, 74, 851–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Schneider, M. (1982). Governmental organization and changing city–suburban income inequality. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 17, 303–318.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., Zhang, W., & Alba, R. D. (2002). Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review, 67, 299–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S. (2005). Racial discrimination in housing: A moving target. Social Problems, 52(2), 148–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Mullan, B. P. (1984). Processes of Hispanic and black spatial assimilation. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 836–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, L. (1999). Gender, identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Initiative on Mixed-Income Communities. (2013). Social dynamics in mixed-income developments (State of the field scan #1). Retrieved from http://nimc.case.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/State-of-the-Field-Scan-1_Social-Dynamics-in-Mixed-Income-Developments.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. L., & Shapiro, T. M. (1995). Black wealth/White wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quillian, L. (2012). Segregation and poverty concentration: The role of three segregations. American Sociological Review, 77, 354–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., & Bischoff, K. (2011). More unequal and more separate: Growth in the residential segregation of families by income, 1970–2009. Retrieved from http://www.s4.brown.edu/us2010/Projects/Reports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Rugh, J. S. (2015). Double jeopardy: Why Latinos were hit hardest by the U.S. foreclosure crisis. Social Forces, 93, 1139–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugh, J. S., & Massey, D. S. (2010). Racial segregation and the American foreclosure crisis. American Sociological Review, 75, 629–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sastry, N. (2012). Neighborhood effects on children's achievement: A review of recent research. In R. King & V. Maholmes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of poverty and child development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199769100.013.0024
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A., Gebhart, M., Vale, L. J., & Kass, A., (2016, March). Trends in U.S. public housing policy. Paper presented at the Urban Affairs Association Annual Conference, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin, S., & Vale, L. J. (2016). Hoping for more: Redeveloping U.S. public housing without marginalizing low-income residents? Housing Studies, 32, 225–244.
   Google Scholar
• Solari, C. D. (2012). Affluent neighborhood persistence and change in U.S. cities. City & Community, 11, 370–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South, S. J., Crowder, K., & Chavez, E. (2005a). Geographic mobility and spatial assimilation among U.S. Latino immigrants. International Migration Review, 39, 577–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South, S. J., Crowder, K., & Chavez, E. (2005b). Migration and spatial assimilation among U.S. Latinos: Classical versus segmented trajectories. Demography, 42, 497–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman, H., Redlich, A., Callahan, L., Robbins, P., & Vesselinov, R. (2011). Effect of mental health courts on arrests and jail days: A multisite study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 167–172. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strait, J. B. (2006). Poverty concentration in the prismatic metropolis: The impact of compositional and redistributive forces within Los Angeles, California, 1990–2000. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28, 71–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tach, L. M. (2009). More than bricks and mortar: Neighborhood frames, social processes, and the mixed‐income redevelopment of a public housing project. City & Community, 8, 273–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tach, L. M., Pendall, R., & Derian, A. (2014). Income mixing across scales: Rationale, trends, policies, practice, and research for more inclusive neighborhoods and metropolitan areas. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/412998-Income-Mixing-across-Scales-Rationale-Trends-Policies-Practice-and-Research-for-More-Inclusive-Neighborhoods-and-Metropolitan-Areas.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Theil, H. (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Tickamyer, A. R. (2000). Space matters! Spatial inequality in future sociology. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 805–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). American Community Survey. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2011). Public and Indian housingrevitalization of severely distressed public housing (HOPE VI) 2011 summary statement and initiatives. Retrieved from https://archives.hud.gov/budget/fy11/cjs/rodph-hopeIV2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vale, L. (2013). Purging the poorest: Public housing and the design politics of twice-cleared communities. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vesselinov, E., Lennon, M. C., & Le Goix, R. (2015, August). Is it all in the eye of the beholder? Mixed-income neighborhoods’ advantage in the context of mortgage foreclosures. Paper presented at a CUSS regular session at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., Nesiba, R., & McConnell, E. D. (2005). The changing face of inequality in home mortgage lending. Social Problems, 52(2), 181–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R., Ellis, M., & Parks, V. (2005). Re‐placing Whiteness in spatial assimilation research. City & Community, 4(2), 111–135.
   Google Scholar