Community resistance and the inclusive city: Devising strategies in São Paulo

References

• Abers, R. N., & Keck, M. E. (2006). Muddy waters: The political construction of deliberative river basin governance in Brazil. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, 601–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abers, R. N., & Keck, M. E. (2009). Mobilizing the state: The erratic partner in Brazil’s participatory water policy. Politics & Society, 37, 289–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias, E. D. (2006). Drugs and democracy in Rio de Janeiro: Trafficking, social networks, and public security. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avritzer, L. (2009). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banaszak, L. A. (2010). The women’s movement inside and outside the state. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belda‐Miquel, S., Peris Blanes, J., & Frediani, A. (2016). Institutionalization and depoliticization of the right to the city: Changing scenarios for radical social movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40, 321–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, A. L., & do Valle, C. L. (2000). Habitação e governança urbana: Avaliação da experiência em 10 cidades brasileiras [Housing and urban governance: Evaluation of the experience in 10 Brazilian cities]. Cadernos Metrópole, 4, 33–63.
   Google Scholar
• Conselho das Cidades. (2009). Resolução Recomendada No. 87 [Recommended Resolution No. 87]. Retrieved from http://www.cidades.gov.br/images/stories/ArquivosCidades/ArquivosPDF/Resolucoes/ResolucaoRecomendada/resolucao-87-2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. A. (2016). The rationed city: The politics of water, housing, and land use in drought-parched São Paulo. Public Culture, 22, 261–289.
   Google Scholar
• Coslovsky, S. V. (2015). Beyond bureaucracy: How prosecutors and public defenders enforce urban planning laws in São Paulo, Brazil. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39, 1103–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho, M. L. d. S. (2010). Ativismo judicial : uma análise a partir do direito à moradia, [Judicial activism: an analysis of the right to housing] (Master’s thesis). Fundação Getúlio Vargas, São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Donaghy, M. (2013). Civil society and participatory governance: Municipal councils and social housing programs in Brazil. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• dos Santos Júnior, O. A. (2002). Democracia, desigualdades e governança local: Dilemas da reforma municipal no Brasil [Democracy, inequality, and local governance: Dilemmas for municipal reform in Brazil]. Cadernos Metrópole, 8, 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• dos Santos Júnior, O. A., Ribeiro, L. C. D. Q., & Azevedo, S. D. (2004). Governança democrática e poder local: A experiência dos conselhos municipais no Brasil [Democratic governance and local power: The experience of municipal councils in Brazil]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Revan, Fase.
   Google Scholar
• Dowbor, M. (2012). A arte da institucionalização: estratégias de mobilização dos sanitaristas (1974–2006) [The art of institutionalization: Mobilization strategies of the Sanitarista Movement in São Paulo (1974–2006)]. São Paulo, Brazil: Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, L. (2012). From insurgent to transgressive citizenship: Housing, social movements and the politics of rights in São Paulo. Journal of Latin American Studies, 44, 97–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P. B. (2002). Livable cities? Urban struggles for livelihood and sustainability. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fix, M. (2001). Parceiros da exclusão: duas histórias da construção de uma “nova cidade” em São Paulo: Faria Lima e Água Espraiada [Partnerships of exclusion: Two histories of the construction of a “new city” in São Paulo: Faria Lima and Água Espraiada]. São Paulo, Brazil: Boitempo Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, K. (2007). Governança urbana e participação pública [Urban governance and public participation]. RAC-eletrônica, 1, 136–150.
   Google Scholar
• Fundação João Pinheiro: Centro de Estatística e Informações. (2015). Déficit habitacional no Brasil 2011–2012 [Housing deficit in Brazil 2011–2012]. Retrieved from http://www.fjp.mg.gov.br/index.php/docman/cei/559-deficit-habitacional-2011-2012/file
   Google Scholar
• Gay, R. (1994). Popular organization and democracy in Rio de Janeiro: A tale of two favelas. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, 939–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1973). Journeys toward progress. Studies of economic policy-making in Latin America. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K., & Keck, M. E. (2007). Greening Brazil: Environmental activism in state and society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2011). 2010 Population censuses. Retrieved from http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/default.shtm
   Google Scholar
• Lavalle, A. G., Acharya, A., & Houtzager, P. P. (2005). Beyond comparative anecdotalism: Lessons on civil society and participation from São Paulo, Brazil. World Development, 33, 951–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1995). The right to the city. In E. Kofman & E. Lebas (Eds.), Writings on cities (pp. 63–81). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, J. (2012). Sobre arquitetos e sem-tetos [Architects and the homeless] (Unpublished thesis), São Carlos, Brazil: Universidade de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P., & Madden, D. (2016). In defense of housing: The politics of crisis. New York, NY: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, E. (2012). Social networks, segregation and poverty in São Paulo. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36, 958–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, E. (2013). Government, political actors and governance in urban policies in Brazil and São Paulo: Concepts for a future research agenda. Brazilian Political Science Review, 7(3), 8–35.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Boudet, H. (2012). Putting social movements in their place: Explaining opposition to energy projects in the United States, 2000–2005. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309–332.
   Google Scholar
• Netto, V. M., Pinheiro, M. S., & Paschoalino, R. (2015). Segregated networks in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39, 1084–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Observatório das Remoções. (2012). Mapa das remoções [Map of removals]. Retrieved from http://www.observatorioderemocoes.fau.usp.br/mapa-denuncias/
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P., & Johnston, H. (2005). What a good idea! Ideology and frames in social movement research. In H. Johnston & J. A. Noakes (Eds.), Fames of protest: Social movement and the framing perspective (pp. 185–216). Laurel, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36, 141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, W. (2012). As metrópoles brasileiras no milênio—Resultados de um projeto de pesquisa [Brazilian metropolitan areas at the millennium—Results of a research project]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto de Pesquisa e Planejamento Urbano e Regional da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro/Observatorio das Metropoles. Retrieved from http://observatoriometropoles.net/download/metropoles_milenio.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rivadulla, M. J. Á. (2012). Clientelism or something else? Squatter politics in Montevideo. Latin American Politics and Society, 54, 37–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secretariat for Housing. (2008). Urbanização de favelas: A experiência de São Paulo [Urbanization of favelas: The experience of São Paulo]. São Paulo, Brazil: Prefeitura da Cidade de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, S. (1991). Politics and Latin America’s urban poor: Reflections from a Lima shantytown. Latin American Research Review, 26(2), 75–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tatagiba, L. (2011). Relação entre movimentos sociais e instituições políticas na cidade de São Paulo. O caso do movimento de moradia [The relationship between social movements and political institutions in the city of São Paulo. The case of the housing movement]. Caminhos Cruzados: Sociedade, Política, Cultura. São Paulo, 34, 185–216.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1995). To explain political processes. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1594–1610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, H. D. G., Marques, E., Ferreira, M. P., & Bitar, S. (2003). Pobreza e espaço: Padrões de segregação em São Paulo [Poverty and space: Patterns of segregation in São Paulo]. Estudos Avançados, 17(47), 97–128.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2010). São Paulo: A tale of two cities. Nairobi, Kenya: Author. Retrieved from http://www.unhabitat.org/pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?PublicátionID=2924
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. (2010). Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation, and accountability. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaffalon Leme Cardoso, L. (2010). Uma fenda na Justiça: A defensoria pública e a construção de inovações democrática [A rift in the justice system: The public defender’s office and the construction of democratic innovations]. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Hucitec.
   Google Scholar