The citizen in city-regions: Patterns and variations

References

• Aars, J. (2013). Fraværende velgere? Pendling og politisk engasjement. [Absent voters? Commuting and Political Engagement.] In Bergh, J. & Christensen, D. A. (Eds.), Et robust lokaldemokrati: lokalvalget i skyggen av 22. juli 2011. [A robust local democracy: The local election in the shadow of 22 of July 2011] (pp. 91–106). Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Andrén, M. (Ed.). (2007). Local citizenship. Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University, Centrum för forskning om offentlig sector [Center for Research on the Public Sector].
   Google Scholar
• Barron, D. J., & Frug, G. E. (2005). Defensive localism: A view of the field from the field. Journal of Law and Politics, 21, 261–291.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. (2003). Reinventing urban citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 7, 139–160. doi:10.1080/1362102032000065946
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A., & Bounds, A. (2013). Urban citizenship. In E. F. Isin (Ed.), Democracy, citizenship and the global city (pp. 243–256). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship. A very short introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolan, M. (1997). The mobility experience and neighborhood attachment. Demography, 34, 225–237.
   Google Scholar
• Breathnach, P. (2014). Creating city-region governance structures in a dysfunctional polity: The case of Ireland’s national spatial strategy. Urban Studies, 51, 2267–2284. doi:10.1177/0042098013493477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashin, S. D. (2000). Localism, self-interest, and the tyranny of the favored quarter: Addressing the barriers to new regionalism. Georgetown Law Journal, 88, 1985–2048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHoog, R. H., Lowery, D., & Lyons, W. E. (1990). Citizen satisfaction with local governance: A test of individual, jurisdictional, and city-specific effects. Journal of Politics, 52, 807–837. doi:10.2307/2131828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, N. (this issue). Citizen’s views on governance in two Swedish city-regions. Journal of Urban Affairs. doi:10.1111/juaf.12317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, C. (2001). Hybrid governance across national jurisdictions as a challenge to constitutional law. European Business Organization Law Review, 2, 569–583. doi:10.1017/S1566752900000604
   Google Scholar
• Garber, J. A. (2009). Gender and sexuality. In J. S. Davies & D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (2nd ed., pp. 204–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. (2011). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier and happier. London, England: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Heinelt, H., & Kübler, D. (Eds.). (2005). Metropolitan governance. capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place (ECPR Studies in European Political Science). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, J. J., & Sharpe, L. J. (1991). Local government in international perspective: Some comparative observations. In J. J. Hesse (Ed.), Local government and urban affairs in international perspective (pp. 603–621). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann-Martinot, V., Rallings, C., & Thrasher, M. (1996). Comparing local electoral turnout in Great Britain and France: More similarities than differences? European Journal of Political Research, 30, 241–257. doi:10.1111/ejpr.1996.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, C. (this issue). Sharing fairly? Mobility, citizenship, and gender relations in two Swedish city-regions. Journal of Urban Affairs. doi:10.1111/juaf.12259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., & van Montfort, A. (2012). Institutional features of inter-municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 121–144. doi:10.1177/0952076711403026
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P., & Savitch, H. V. (2010). The politics of city regions in comparative perspective. Métropoles, 7, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher, C., & Lowery, D. (2004). Political participation and metropolitan institutional contexts. Urban Affairs Review, 39, 720–757. doi:10.1177/1078087404264219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kübler, D. (2005). La métropole et le citoyen [The metropolis and the citizen]. Lausanne, Switzerland: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler, D. (this issue). Citizenship in the fragmented metropolis: An individual-level analysis from Switzerland. Journal of Urban Affairs. doi:10.1111/juaf.12276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackowska, M., & Mikula, L. (this issue). How metropolitan can you go? Citizenship in Polish city-regions. Journal of Urban Affairs. doi:10.1111/juaf.12260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladner, A. (2002). Size and direct democracy at the local level: The case of Switzerland. Environment and Planning C, 20, 813–828. doi:10.1068/c0226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A. (2002). Municipal size and democracy: A critical analysis of the argument of proximity based on the case of Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies, 25, 317–332. doi:10.1111/scps.2002.25.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D., & Serritzlew, S. (2011). Jurisdiction size and local democracy: Evidence on internal political efficacy from large-scale municipal reform. American Political Science Review, 105, 238–258. doi:10.1017/S000305541100013X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, C. (2010). The improbable metropolis: Decentralization, local democracy and metropolitan areas in the Western world. Análise Social, 45, 623–637.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2006). Commuting and citizen participation in Swedish city-regions. Political Studies, 54, 865–888. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00637.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2010). Citizens’ intermunicipal political orientations: Evidence from Swedish city-regions. Urban Studies, 47, 2093–2109. doi:10.1177/0042098009357960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2013). Citizens in the city-regions. Political orientations across municipal borders. Urban Affairs Review, 49, 282–306. doi:10.1177/1078087412457549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (this issue). Territorial political orientations in Swedish city-regions. Journal of Urban Affairs. doi:10.1111/juaf.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F., & Lidström, A. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of local and regional democracy in Europe. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D., DeHoog, R. H., & Lyons, W. E. (1992). Citizenship in the empowered locality. An elaboration, a critique and a partial test. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 28, 69–103. doi:10.1177/004208169202800104
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. (1995). Citizenship and urban politics. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 160–180). London, England: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1981). Politische theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat [Political theory in the welfare state]. München, Germany: Gunter Olzug.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. E., Lowery, D., & DeHoog, R. H. (1992). The politics of dissatisfaction: Citizens, services and urban institutions. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. L., Dickson, M., & Stoker, G. (2000). Models of local governance. Public opinion and political theory in Britain. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, P. E. (1989). City size and citizens’ satisfaction: Two competing theories revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 17, 661–688. doi:10.1111/ejpr.1989.17.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2011). Regions and innovation policy. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Otgaar, A., van Den Berg, L., van Der Meer, J., & Speller, C. (2008). Empowering metropolitan regions through new forms of cooperation. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, M. L., & Sumner, J. L. (this issue). Regional or parochial? Support for cross-community sharing within city-regions. Journal of Urban Affairs. doi:10.1111/juaf.12279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E., & Goldsmith, M. (1987). Central and local government relations. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J. (2005). Perspectives on the city-region. Regional Studies, 39, 555–566. doi:10.1080/00343400500151798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plüss, L. (2015). Municipal councillors in metropolitan governance: Assessing the democratic deficit of new regionalism in Switzerland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 22, 261–284. doi:10.1177/0969776412469804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2007). City‐regions, neoliberal globalization and democracy: A research agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, 197–206. doi:10.1111/ijur.2007.31.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remmer, K. L. (2010). Political scale and electoral turnout: Evidence from the less industrialized world. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 275–303.
   Google Scholar
• Sancton, A. (2008). The limits of boundaries. Why city-regions cannot be self-governing. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap, L. (1997). Op zoek naar prikkelende overheidssturing. Over autopoiese, zelfsturing en stadsprovincie [In search for inciting governance. On autopoiesis, self-steering and city-province]. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap, L., & Daemen, H. H. F. M. (Eds.). (2012). Renewal in European local democracies. Puzzles, dilemmas and options. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap, L., De Graaf, L. J., & van Ostaaijen, J. J. C. (2010). Democratisering van governance: Oplossingen voor het democratisch tekort in intergemeentelijke samenwerking Democratization of governance: Solutions for the democratic deficit in inter-community cooperation]. Bestuurskunde, 19(4), 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, J. M., Arretche, M., Kubler, D., & Razin, E. (Eds.). (2017). Inequality and governance in the metropolis. Place equality regimes and fiscal choices in eleven countries. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, J. M., & Hoffmann-Martinot, V. (2008). Metropolitan governance. In Decentralization and local democracy in the world (pp. 257–281). Barcelona, Spain: United Cities and Local Governments.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, J. M., Kübler, D., Walter-Rogg, M., & Walks, R. A. (Eds.). (2013). The political ecology of the metropolis. Metropolitan sources of electoral behaviour in eleven countries. Essex, England: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. P., & McQuarrie, M. (2012). Remaking urban citizenship. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsnes, K., & Aars, J. (2011). Pendling og sosial kapital innenfor norske storbyregioner [Commuting and social capital within Norwegian metropolitan areas]. In D. Wollebæk & S. Segaard (Eds.), Sosial kapital i Norge [Social capital in Norway] (pp. 225–243). Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Damm.
   Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, P., & Lackowska, M. (2008). Cosmopolitans of small fatherlands. Miscelanea Geografica, 13, 197–208.
   Google Scholar
• Tomàs, M. (2009). La governabilitat metropolitana a Europa i l’Amèrica del Nord [Metropolitan governance in Europe and North America]. Barcelona, Spain: Diputació de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Vallbe, J.-J., Magre, J., & Tomas, M. (this issue). Being metropolitan: The effects of individual and contextual factors on shaping metropolitan identity. Journal of Urban Affairs. doi:10.1111/juaf.12243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Villazov, R. C. (2010). Sanctuary cities and local citizenship. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 37, 573–598.
   Google Scholar
• Walks, A. R. (2006). The causes of city–suburban political polarization. A Canadian case study. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 390–414. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter-Rogg, M. (2006). Metropolitan areas and political impact in Germany. In V. Hoffmann-Martinot & J. Sellers (Eds.), Metropolitization and political change (pp. 83–117). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Walter-Rogg, M. (this issue). What about metropolitan citizenship? Attitudinal attachment of residents to their city-region. Journal of Urban Affairs. doi:10.1080/07352166.2017.1355664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlund, O., & Wyzan, M. L. (1995). Household migration and the local public sector: Evidence from Sweden 1981–1984. Regional Studies, 29, 145–157. doi:10.1080/00343409512331348863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H. (2010). Comparing two logics of interlocal cooperation: The cases of France and Germany. Urban Affairs Review, 46, 263–292. doi:10.1177/1078087410377608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar