Transforming neighborhoods: Explaining effectiveness in community-based development organizations

References

• Atlas, J., & Shoshkes, E. (1997). Saving affordable housing: What community groups can do & what government should do. Montclair, NJ: National Housing Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Ramalho, N. (2006). Communalities and distinctions in the measurement of organizational performance and effectiveness across for-profit and nonprofit sectors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 39–65. doi:10.1177/0899764005282468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bish, A., & Becker, K. (2015). Exploring expectations of nonprofit management capabilities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45, 437–457. doi:10.1177/0899764015583313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, S. W. (2007). Linking nonprofit capacity to effectiveness in the new public management era: The case of community action agencies. State & Local Government Review, 39(3), 144–152. doi:10.1177/0160323X0703900303
   Google Scholar
• Blakely, E. J., & Leigh, N. G. (2010). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. G., Vidal, A. C., Schwartz, A., Keyes, L. C., & Stockard, J. (1998). The status of nonprofit-owned affordable housing: Short-term successes and long-term challenges. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64, 39–51. doi:10.1080/01944369808975955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. A. (2005). Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15, 317–339. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Bruijn, H. D. (2002). Performance measurement in the public sector: Strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15, 578–594. doi:10.1108/09513550210448607
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. F., & Tuckman, H. P. (1994). Revenue diversification among non-profits. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 5(3), 273–290.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, S. M., Rohe, W., & Baku, E. (1999). Factors influencing the performance of community development corporations. Journal of Urban Affairs, 21, 325–339. doi:10.1111/0735-2166.00020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutchfield, L. R., & Grant, H. M. (2012). Forces for good: The six practices of high-impact nonprofits. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, S., & Glaser, M. (1983). An examination of the perceived effectiveness of community development corporations: A pilot study. Journal of Urban Affairs, 5, 315–330. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.1983.tb00045.x
   Google Scholar
• Dalehite, E. G., Mikesell, J. L., & Zorn, C. K. (2005). Variation in property tax abatement programs among states. Economic Development Quarterly, 19(2), 157–173. doi:10.1177/0891242404272352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2011). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method—2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. (2002). Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector on society is probably impossible but possibly useful. In P. Flynn & V. A. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector (pp. 249–272). New York, NY: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2003). Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 191–212. doi:10.1002/nml.v14:2
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. (2002). Organizational capacity and organizational effectiveness among street-level food assistance programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 115–130. doi:10.1177/0899764002311005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Faux, G. P. (1971). CDCs: New hope for the inner city: Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Community Development Corporations. New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, T., & Snyder, L. (1999). What is the difference between performance and benchmarking? Public Management, 81, 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, D. P. (1998). Measuring the unmeasurable: Empirical studies of nonprofit organization effectiveness from 1977 to 1997. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(2), 183–202. doi:10.1177/0899764098272005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford Foundation. (1973). Community development corporations: A strategy for depressed urban and rural areas. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fredericksen, P., & London, R. (2000). Disconnect in the hollow state: The pivotal role of organizational capacity in community-based development organizations. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 230–239. doi:10.1111/puar.2000.60.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 246–268. doi:10.1177/0899764099283002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garn, H. A., Tevis, N. L., & Snead, C. E. (1976). Evaluating community development corporations: A summary report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gittell, R., & Wilder, M. (1999). Community development corporations: Critical factors that influence success. Journal of Urban Affairs, 21(3), 341–361. doi:10.1111/0735-2166.00021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman, N. J., & Servon, L. J. (1998). More than bricks and sticks: Five components of community development corporation capacity. Housing Policy Debate, 9(3), 497–539. doi:10.1080/10511482.1998.9521306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman, N. J., & Servon, L. J. (2003). By the numbers: Measuring community development corporations’ capacity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(3), 240–256. doi:10.1177/0739456X02250314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, R. T., & Engberg, J. B. (2004). The impact of state enterprise zones on urban manufacturing establishments. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 315–339. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, R. T., & Landers, J. (2009). Why are state policy makers still proponents of enterprise zones? What explains their action in the face of a preponderance of the research? International Regional Science Review, 32, 466–479. doi:10.1177/0160017609341385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grogan, P. S., & Proscio, T. (2000). Comeback cities: A blueprint for urban neighborhood revival. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1997). Multiple constituencies and the social construction of nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2), 185–206. doi:10.1177/0899764097262006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1998). Nonprofit organizational effectiveness: Contrasts between especially effective and less effective organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(1), 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1999). Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(2), 107–126. doi:10.1177/0899764099282001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Public Administration Review, 64, 694–704. doi:10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2008). Advancing nonprofit organizational effectiveness research and theory: Nine theses. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18, 399–415. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., & Callahan, K. (1998). Government at work: Best practices and model programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. D., Donohue, W. A., Atkin, C. K., & Johnson, S. (1995). Differences between organizational and communication factors related to contrasting innovations. Journal of Business Communication, 32, 65–80. doi:10.1177/002194369503200104
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (2004). Community development corporations, participation, and accountability: The Harlem Urban Development Corporation and the Bedford-Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 594, 109–124. doi:10.1177/0002716204264991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchhoff, B. A. (1977). Organization effectiveness measurement and policy research. Academy of Management Review, 2, 347–355.
   Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K., & Wright, N. S. (2010). Does performance measurement improve strategic decision making? Findings from a national survey of nonprofit social service agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 571–587. doi:10.1177/0899764009359942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letts, C. W., Ryan, W., & Grossman, A. (1997). Virtuous capital: What foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 36–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, P. C. (2004). Sustaining nonprofit performance: The case for capacity building and the evidence to support it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marwell, N. P. (2009). Bargaining for Brooklyn: Community organizations in the entrepreneurial city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, N. (1984). Neighborhood organizations and community development: Making revitalization work. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, N., & Blake, J. L. (1981). Keys to the growth of neighborhood development organizations. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. E. (2007). An investigation of innovation in nonprofit organizations: The role of organizational mission. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 256–281. doi:10.1177/0899764006295996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: A theoretical and empirical exposition. Research in Public Administration, 2, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Minkoff, D. C., and W. W. Powell (2006). Nonprofit mission: Constancy, responsiveness, or deflection? In W. W. Powell and R. Steinberg (eds.), The Non- profit Sector, 2d ed. (pp. 591–611). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. E. (2013). The construct of organizational effectiveness: Perspectives from leaders of international nonprofits in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(2), 324–345. doi:10.1177/0899764011434589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar, J. J., & Rogers, D. L. (1976). Organizational effectiveness: An empirical comparision of the goal and system resource approaches. The Sociological Quarterly, 17, 401–413. doi:10.1111/tsq.1976.17.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Ingraham, P. W. (2004). Integrative leadership in the public sector: A model of performance-information use. Administration & Society, 36, 427–453. doi:10.1177/0095399704266748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2004). Testing how management matters in an era of government by performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 421–439. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, V. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations. In D. O. Renz (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (3rd ed., pp. 431–458). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nobbie, P. D., & Brudney, J. L. (2003). Testing the implementation, board performance, and organizational effectiveness of the policy governance model in nonprofit boards of directors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 571–595. doi:10.1177/0899764003257460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., & Moynihan, D. P. (2007). Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: A multimethod study. Public Performance & Management Review, 30, 398–425. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576300305
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, N. R., & Steinbach, C. (1987). Corrective capitalism: The rise of America’s community development corporations. New York, NY: Ford Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Plantz, M. C., Greenway, M. T., & Hendricks, M. (1997). Outcome measurement: Showing results in the nonprofit sector. New Directions for Evaluation, 1997(75), 15–30. doi:10.1002/ev.1077
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59, 325–335. doi:10.2307/3110115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J. L. (1972). The study of organizational effectiveness. The Sociological Quarterly, 13, 3–15. doi:10.1111/tsq.1972.13.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29, 33–51. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 1–32. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024401
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M. (1998). Do community development corporations live up to their billing? A review and critique of the research findings. In C. T. Koebel (Ed.), Shelter and society: Theory, research, and policy for nonprofit housing (pp. 177–200). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., & Bratt, R. G. (2003). Failures, downsizings, and mergers among community development corporations. Housing Policy Debate, 14, 1–46. doi:10.1080/10511482.2003.9521466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., Quercia, R., & Levy, D. (2001). The performance of non-profit housing developments in the United States. Housing Studies, 16, 595–618. doi:10.1080/02673030120080071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). Operationalizing the competing values approach: Measuring performance in the employment service. Public Productivity Review, 5(2), 141–159. doi:10.2307/3380030
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J. (2000). Renewing hope within neighborhoods of despair: The community-based development model. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhill, J. C., & Williamson, D. (2001). Mission impossible?: Measuring success in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11, 371–386. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Schill, M. H. (1996). Assessing the role of community development corporations in inner city economic development. N.Y.U. Review of Law & Social Change, 22, 753–766.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A., Bratt, R. G., Vidal, A. C., & Keyes, L. C. (1996). Nonprofit housing organizations and institutional support: The management challenge. Journal of Urban Affairs, 18, 389–407. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.1996.tb00387.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1313–1320. doi:10.1007/BF00411816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, T. (2007). Understanding sport organizations: The application of organization theory. Journal of Sport Management, 21, 455–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. E., Selden, S. C., & Sandfort, J. R. (2004). No longer unmeasurable? A multidimensional integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 711–728. doi:10.1177/0899764004269146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbach, C., Walker, C., Winston, F., & Gensch, K. (2006). Reaching new heights, 2005 NCCED Census: Trends and achievements of community-based development organizations. Washington, DC: National Congress for Community Economic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbach, C. F., & Zdenek, R. O. (1999). Lessons from a fall: What went wrong at ECI. The NeighborWorks Journal, 5, 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. M. (2000). Exploring the effects of collaborations on member organizations: Washington county’s welfare-to-work partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(Suppl. 1), 98–119. doi:10.1177/0899764000291S005
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. M., Bigelow, B., & Crittenden, W. (1999). Research on strategic management in nonprofit organizations synthesis, analysis, and future directions. Administration & Society, 31, 378–423. doi:10.1177/00953999922019184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoutland, S. E. (1999). Community development corporations: Mission, strategy and accomplishments. In R. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp. 193–240). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, A. (1992). Rebuilding communities: A national study of urban community development corporations. New York, NY: Community Development Research Center, New School for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, A. (1995). Reintegrating disadvantaged communities into the fabric of urban life: The role of community development. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 169–230. doi:10.1080/10511482.1995.9521185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal, A. (1996). CDCs as agents of neighborhood change: The state of the art. In W. D. Keating, N. Krumholz, & P. Starr (Eds.), Revitalizing urban neighborhoods (pp. 149–163). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. (2002). Community development corporations and their changing support systems. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar