Privately owned parks in New Urbanist communities: A study of environmental privilege, equity, and inclusion

References

• Banerjee, T. (2001). The future of public space. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67, 9–24. doi:10.1080/01944360108976352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Better Cities and Towns. (n.d.). Colorado: New urban developments. Retrieved from http://bettercities.net/places/places_new_urban_development/us/CO
   Google Scholar
• Boulder Economic Council. (2011). Demographic profile: Boulder Colorado. Retrieved from https://www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/boulder-demographic-profile-december-2011-1-201305151232.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boulder Housing Partners. (n.d.). Holiday neighborhood development project. Retrieved from http://boulderhousing.org/holiday-neighborhood-development-project
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, M. C. (1994). The city of collective memory: Its historical imagery and architectural entertainments. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, H., Jenkins, F., & Grigg, W. (2006). Comparing private schools and public schools using hierarchical linear modeling. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• City and County of Denver. (2010). Inclusionary housing ordinance administrative rules and regulations. Retrieved from http://www.denvergov.org/Portals/690/documents/IHORules-Reg-Combined.pdf
   Google Scholar
• City of Boulder. (2000). Comprehensive housing strategy. Retrieved from http://www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/comphousingstrategy2000full-1-201307121650.pdf
   Google Scholar
• City of Commerce City. (2009). Park and school fees. Retrieved from http://www.c3gov.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/410
   Google Scholar
• City of Los Angeles. (2016). Department of City Planning recommendation report: Case number CPC-2015-2328-CA-GPA. Retrieved from http://planning.lacity.org/ordinances/docs/parksdedication/QuimbyFinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Congress for the New Urbanism. (1999). Charter of the New Urbanism. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional.
   Google Scholar
• The Congress for the New Urbanism Colorado. (n.d.). Places. Retrieved from http://cnucolorado.org/category/places/
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, J. L. (2004). The proximate principle: The impact of parks, open space and water features on residential property values and the property tax base (2nd ed.). Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, J. L. (2010). An analysis of parkland dedication ordinances in Texas. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28, 70–102.
   Google Scholar
• Denver Regional Council of Governments. (2016). Regional data catalog. Retrieved from http://gis.drcog.org/datacatalog/
   Google Scholar
• Dong, H. (2015). Were home prices in New Urbanist neighborhoods more resilient in the recent housing downturn? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35, 5–18. doi:10.1177/0739456X14560769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. M., Binder, A. J., & Skrentny, J. D. (2010). Elite status and social change: Using field analysis to explain policy formation and implementation. Social Problems, 57, 49–73. doi:10.1525/sp.2010.57.1.49.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest City. (2016). Stapleton parks: A love story. Retrieved from http://www.stapletondenver.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Parks-Brochure.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, B. J., & Sagalyn, L. B. (1989). Downtown, Inc.: How America rebuilds cities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M. H., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K., Ng, K., …, Donovan, R. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(Suppl. 2), 169–176. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, K., & Porterfield, G. (2001). Community by design: New Urbanism for suburbs and small communities (1st ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harnik, P., & Martin, A. (2015). Public spaces/private money: The triumphs and pitfalls of urban park conservancies. Washington, DC: The Trust for Public Land.
   Google Scholar
• Harnik, P., & Yaffe, L. (2005). Who’s going to pay for this park? The role of developer exactions in the creation of new city parks. Washington, DC: The Trust for Public Land.
   Google Scholar
• Joassart-Marcelli, P., Wolch, J. R., & Salim, Z. (2011). Building the healthy city: The role of nonprofits in creating active urban parks. Urban Geography, 32, 682–711. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.32.5.682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. (1998). Excavating the hidden city of social reproduction: A commentary. City & Society, 10, 37–46. doi:10.1525/city.1998.10.1.37
   Google Scholar
• Kaysen, R. (2013, November 26). Malls work on their security, but keep it in the background. The New York Times, p. B8. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/27/realestate/commercial/malls-work-on-their-security-but-keep-it-in-the-background.html
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, M. (2004). Brave new neighborhoods: The privatization of public space. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 557–584. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43, 265–275. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, S., & Noel, T. J. (1990). Denver: Mining camp to metropolis. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Banerjee, T. (1998). Urban design downtown: Poetics and politics of form. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry Community Master Association. (n.d.). Lowry’s parks. Retrieved from http://www.lowrydenver.com/lowrys-parks/#.V8n08pgrKUk
   Google Scholar
• Lund, H. (2003). Testing the claims of New Urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 414–429. doi:10.1080/01944360308976328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony, E. (2016, December). From Zuccotti Park to Trump Tower: Privately owned public spaces epitomize the dangers of privatizing collective goods. Jacobin. Retrieved from https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/12/private-public-space-nyc-urban-politics-policy
   Google Scholar
• Mapes, J., & Wolch, J. (2011). “Living green”: The promise and pitfalls of new sustainable communities. Journal of Urban Design, 16, 105–126. doi:10.1080/13574809.2011.521012
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & Place, 16, 712–726. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. Newbury Park, CA: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E. (2005). Constructing the Pomerium in Las Vegas: A case study of emerging trends in American gated communities. Housing Studies, 20(2), 187–203. doi:10.1080/026730303042000331727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennis, J. L. (2006). Socioeconomic–vegetation relationships in urban, residential land: The case of Denver, Colorado. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72, 911–921. doi:10.14358/PERS.72.8.911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K. F. (2007). Designs on the public: The private lives of New York’s public spaces. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Németh, J. (2006). Conflict, exclusion, relocation: Skateboarding and public space. Journal of Urban Design, 11, 297–318. doi:10.1080/13574800600888343
   Google Scholar
• Németh, J. (2009). Defining a public: The management of privately owned public space. Urban Studies, 46, 2463–2490. doi:10.1177/0042098009342903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Németh, J. (2012). Controlling the commons: How public is public space? Urban Affairs Review, 48, 811–835. doi:10.1177/1078087412446445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Németh, J., & Schmidt, S. (2007). Toward a methodology for measuring the security of publicly accessible spaces. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73, 283–297. doi:10.1080/01944360708977978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Németh, J., & Schmidt, S. (2011). The privatization of public space: Modeling and measuring publicness. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38, 5–23. doi:10.1068/b36057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The New York City Department of City Planning, The Municipal Art Society of New York, & Kayden, J. S. (2000). Privately owned public space: The New York City experience. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, S. (2009, November 29). Austin weighs joining cities making density deals with developers. Austin American-Statesman, p. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Kit, B. K., & Flegal, K. M. (2014). Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311, 806–814. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincetl, S. (2003). Nonprofits and park provision in Los Angeles: An exploration of the rise of governance approaches to the provision of local services. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 979–1001. doi:10.1046/j.0038-4941.2003.08404019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. (2000). Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 12–40. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigolon, A. (2016). A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 160–169. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigolon, A., & Flohr, T. L. (2014). Access to parks for youth as an environmental justice issue: Access inequalities and possible solutions. Buildings, 4(2), 69–94. doi:10.3390/buildings4020069
   Google Scholar
• Speck, J. (2013). Walkable city: How downtown can save America, one step at a time. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Spivack, D. R., Yañez, E., & Bodke, A. (2014). Creating New Urban park space in Los Angeles: An analysis of the current Quimby ordinance and recommended improvements. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton Master Community Association. (n.d.). Parks rules. Retrieved from http://www.stapletoncommunity.com/parks/park-rules
   Google Scholar
• State of Colorado. (2013). Colorado revised statutes 2013—Title 32—Special districts. Denver, CO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2002). The social goals of New Urbanism. Housing Policy Debate, 13, 165–188. doi:10.1080/10511482.2002.9521438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2003). Neighborhoods as service providers: A methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(2), 181–200. doi:10.1068/b12977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2005). New Urbanism and American planning: The conflict of cultures. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2010). Affordability in New Urbanist development: Principle, practice, and strategy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32, 489–510. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00518.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till, K. E. (2001). New Urbanism and nature: Green marketing and the neotraditional community. Urban Geography, 22(3), 220–248. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.22.3.220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Town Paper. (n.d.). Links to TND and New Urban neighborhoods. Retrieved from http://www.tndtownpaper.com/neighborhoods.htm
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). American Community Survey. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Annual estimates of the resident population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2015—United States—Metropolitan statistical area. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolch, J. R., Wilson, J. P., & Fehrenbach, J. (2005). Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis. Urban Geography, 26, 4–35. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.26.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar