Collective efficacy in disadvantaged neighborhoods: The influence of Habitat for Humanity

References

• Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class and change in an urban community. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Real Estate Analysis, Inc. (1998). Making homeownership a reality: Survey of Habitat for Humanity (HFHI), Inc., homeowners and affiliates. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Belsky, S., Retsinas, N., & Duda, M. (2007). The financial returns of low-income homeownership. In W. Rohe & H. Watson (Eds.), Chasing the American dream (pp. 191–212). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. (2007). Homeownership for low-income households: A comparison of the Section 235, Nehemiah, and Habitat for Humanity programs. In W. Rohe & H. Watson (Eds.), Chasing the American dream (pp. 41–65). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, K. L., Billy, J. O. G., & Grady, W. R. (1993). Social context and adolescent behavior: The impact of community on the transition to sexual activity. Social Forces, 71, 713–740. doi:10.1093/sf/71.3.713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. S. (1998). Brown kids in White suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 177–221. doi:10.1080/10511482.1998.9521290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. S., Comey, J., & Weismann, G. (2010). Struggling to stay out of high-poverty neighborhoods: Housing choice and locations in moving to opportunity’s first decade. Housing Policy Debate, 20, 383–427. doi:10.1080/10511481003788745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99, 353–395. doi:10.1086/230268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, K., & Lam, K. (2008). Rates of foreclosure in HOME and ADDI programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. Retrieved from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/addi1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R., Khare, A., & Joseph, M. (2012). Participation, deliberation, and decision-making: The dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in mixed-income developments. Urban Affairs Review, 48, 863–906. doi:10.1177/1078087412450151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. (2015). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106(4), 855–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisneros, H., & Engdahl, L. (Eds.). (2009). From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. A. V. (2005). Intervening in the residential mobility process: Neighborhood outcomes for low-income populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 15307–15312. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507308102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulton, C., Theodos, B., & Turner, M. (2009). Family mobility and neighborhood change: New evidence and implications for community initiatives. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://mcstudy.norc.org/publications/files/411973%20family_mobility.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crane, J. (1991). Effects of neighborhoods on dropping out of school and teenage childbearing. In C. Jencks & P. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 299–320). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Defilippis, J., & Fraser, J. (2010). Why do we want mixed-income housing and neighborhoods? In J. Davies & D. Imbroscio (Eds.), Critical urban studies: New directions (pp. 135–147). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deluca, S., & Rosenblatt, P. (2010). Does moving to better neighborhoods lead to better schooling opportunities? Parental school choice in an experimental housing voucher program. Teachers College Record, 112, 1443–1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmer, P., & Seelig, S. (1998). The rising long-term trend of single-family mortgage foreclosure rates (Working Paper 98-2). Washington, DC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• ESRI. (2017a). ArcGIS business analyst. Retrieved from http://www.esri.com/software/businessanalyst
   Google Scholar
• ESRI. (2017b). ArcGIS community analyst. Retrieved from http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/community-analyst
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, J. C., Burns, A. B., Bazuin, J. T., & Oakley, D. A. (2012). Hope VI, colonization, and the production of difference. Urban Affairs Review, 49, 525–556. doi:10.1177/1078087412465582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, M. (2000). More than houses: How Habitat for Humanity is transforming lives and neighborhoods. Nashville, TN: Word Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fullilove, M. (2005). Root shock: How tearing up city neighborhoods hurts America, and what we can do about it. New York, NY: One World/Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., & Killen, S. P. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 7–43. doi:10.1080/10511482.1995.9521180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., & Zobel, A. (1998). Will dispersed housing programmes reduce social problems in the U.S.? Housing Studies, 13, 605–622. doi:10.1080/02673039883128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goering, J., & Feins, J. (2008). Social science, housing policy, and the harmful effects of poverty. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(2), 139–148. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2008.00383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2007). Is housing tenure the neighborhood dividing line? The polarizing politics of homeownership. In W. M. Rohe & H. Watson (Eds.), Chasing the American dream (pp. 96–110). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2011). Gentrification in Black and White: The racial impact of public housing demolition in American cities. Urban Studies, 48, 1581–1604. doi:10.1177/0042098010375323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habitat for Humanity International. (2017a). Habitat’s history. Retrieved from http://www.habitat.org/how/historytext.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Habitat for Humanity International. (2017b). Qualifications for Habitat homeownership. Retrieved from https://www.habitat.org/housing-help/apply/qualifications-for-habitat-homeownership
   Google Scholar
• Hays, A. (2002). Habitat for Humanity: Building social capital through faith-based service. Urban Affairs, 24(3), 247–269. doi:10.1111/1467-9906.00126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyra, D. (2008). The new urban renewal: The economic transformation of Harlem and Bronzville. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyra, D. (2012). Conceptualizing the New Urban renewal: Comparing the past to the present. Urban Affairs Review, 48(4), 498–527. doi:10.1177/1078087411434905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyra, D. (2013). Commentary: Mixed income housing: Where have we been and where do we go from here? Cityscape, 15(2), 123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. (2008). [U]nited and actuated by some common impulse of passion. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(2), 111–130. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2008.00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. (1997). Poverty & place: Ghettos, barrios and the American city. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsley, G. (2009). Appendix. In H. Cisneros & L. Engdahl (Eds.), From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s Cities (pp. 299–306). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kornhauser, R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., & Hirschfield, P. (2001). Urban poverty and juvenile crime: Evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 655–679. doi:10.1162/00335530151144122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Making Connections. (2014a). Study design. Retrieved from http://mcstudy.norc.org/study-design/
   Google Scholar
• Making Connections. (2014b). Frequently asked questions, about the survey. Retrieved from http://mcstudy.norc.org/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Q., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Schmidt, N., & Osypuk, T. (2016). The effects of a housing mobility experiment on participants’ residential environments. Housing Policy Debate, 27(3), 419–448. doi:10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S., Cunningham, M., & Burt, M. (2005). Public housing transformation and the hard to house. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 1–24. doi:10.1080/10511482.2005.9521531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S., Katz, B., Cunningham, M., Brown, K., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. (2004). A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., Quercia, R., & Van Zandt, S. (2007). The social–psychological effects of affordable homeownership. In W. M. Rohe & H. Watson (Eds.), Chasing the American dream (pp. 215–232). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., & Popkin, S. J. (1991). Employment and earnings of low-income Blacks who move to middle-class suburbs. In C. Jencks & P. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 342–356). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (2008). Moving to inequality: Neighborhood effects and experiments meet social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 189–231. doi:10.1086/589843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Graif, C. (2009). Neighborhood social capital as differential social organization: Resident and leadership dimensions. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1579–1605. doi:10.1177/0002764209331527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. (2010). Housing policy in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A., & Tajbakhsh, K. (2005). Mixed income housing. In F. Wagner, T. Joder, A. Mumphrie, K. Akundi, & A. Artibise (Eds.), Revitalizing the central city: Strategies to contain sprawl and revive the core (pp. 248–274). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1969). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1942)
   Google Scholar
• Shook, J. (2006). Making housing happen: Faith-based affordable housing models. Atlanta, GA: Chalice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., & Kingsley, G. (2008). Federal programs for addressing low-income housing needs: A policy primer. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., & Rawlings, L. (2009). Promoting neighborhood diversity: Benefits, barriers and strategies. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, K., Clampet-Lundquist, S., Edin, K., Kling, J. R., & Duncan, G. J. (2006). Neighborhood effects on barriers to employment: Results from randomized housing mobility experiment in Baltimore. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 7, 137–187. doi:10.1353/urb.2006.0028
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2000). 2000 census. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 census. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/2010census/data/
   Google Scholar
• White House. (2010). White House Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/poverty
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyly, E. K., & Hammel, D. J. (1999). Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 711–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar