Drift and conversion in metropolitan governance: The rise of California’s redevelopment agencies

References

• Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54, 401–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton-Aschman Associates (Ed.). (1973). Tax incremental financing of urban redevelopment programs: Proceedings of conference held in Chicago, Ill., Sept. 25, 1973. Evanston, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, D. F., Coomes, J. E., Jr., Hawkins, T. B., Quinn, E. J., Jr., & Yang, I. P. (1991). Redevelopment in California (1st ed.). Point Arena, CA: Solano Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2016). Reassessing policy drift: Social policy change in the United States. Social Policy & Administration, 50, 201–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren v. Moore, 392 P.2d 522 (Cal. 1964).
   Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J. (1975, 13 March). County moves to curb renewal losses. Los Angeles Times, p. sg4.
   Google Scholar
• Burbank, G. (1992). Speaker Moretti, Governor Reagan, and the search for tax reform in California, 1970–1972. Pacific Historical Review, 61(2), 193–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, N. (1994). The formation of American local governments: Private values in public institutions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• California Legislature. (1949). Report of the Senate Interim Committee on Community Redevelopment and Housing: (created pursuant to Senate resolution no. 118). Sacramento, CA: Senate of the State of California.
   Google Scholar
• California Redevelopment Assn. v. Matosantos, 267 P.3d 580 (Cal. 2011).
   Google Scholar
• California State Senate Committee on Local Government. (1975). Staff report on tax increment financing of redevelopment. Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Central Los Angeles; revitalization efforts approved by council. (1995, December 22). Los Angeles Times, p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Cerritos Public Financing Authority. (1993a). $27,555,000 1993 Revenue bonds, series A (tax-exempt) (Los Cerritos redevelopment project loan), $17,525,000 1993 revenue bonds, series B (taxable) (Los Cerritos redevelopment project loan). Retrieved from http://emma.msrb.org/MS81759-MS60006-MD514752.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cerritos Public Financing Authority. (1993b). $42,155,000 1993 Revenue bonds, series A (tax exempt) (Los Coyotes redevelopment project loan), $63,765,000 1993 revenue bonds, series B (taxable) (Los Coyotes redevelopment project loan). Retrieved from http://emma.msrb.org/MS81761-MS60007-MD514754.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cerritos Public Financing Authority. (2002). $96,260,000 2002 Tax allocation revenue bonds, series A (Cerritos redevelopment projects); $19,775,000 2002 subordinate tax allocation revenue bonds, series B (Cerritos redevelopment projects). Retrieved from http://emma.msrb.org/MS198168-MS173476-MD336196.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. (2001). Tax increment financing and fiscal stress: The California genesis. In C. L. Johnson & J. Y. Man (Eds.), Tax increment financing and economic development: Uses, structures, and impacts (pp. 113–136). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Citrin, J., & Martin, I. W. (Eds.). (2009). After the tax revolt: California’s Proposition 13 turns 30. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Public Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clutter, M. (1972, July 6). Cerritos council votes itself redevelopment job. Press-Telegram, p. B1.
   Google Scholar
• Clutter, M. (1974, April 9). $15 Million war on blight set in Cerritos. Independent, p. B-5.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. (1996). From town center to shopping center: the reconfiguration of community marketplaces in postwar America. The American Historical Review, 101, 1050–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Community Redevelopment Act, 1945 Cal. Stat. 1326.
   Google Scholar
• Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles. (1975). Redevelopment plan for Central Business District Redevelopment Project. Los Angeles, CA: Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles. Retrieved from http://www.crala.org/internet-site/Projects/CBD/upload/cbd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles. (1995). Redevelopment plan for the council District Nine corridors south of the Santa Monica Freeway Recovery Redevelopment Project. Los Angeles, CA: Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles. Retrieved from http://www.crala.org/internet-site/Projects/CD9/upload/cd9corridors_Plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles v. Goldman, 389 P.2d 538 (Cal. 1964).
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, W. W., Bollens, J. C., & Scott, S. (1972). California government and politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dardia, M. (1998). Subsidizing redevelopment in California. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_298MDR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DeLeon, R., & LeGates, R. T. (1977). Community development block grants: Redistribution effects and equity issues. The Urban Lawyer, 9, 364–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detwiler, P. (2012). Broken promises: The end of California redevelopment. Planning & Environmental Law, 64(6), 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Diver, C. S. (1983). The optimal precision of administrative rules. The Yale Law Journal, 93, 65–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erie, S. P. (2004). Globalizing L.A.: Trade, infrastructure, and regional development. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eskew, G. L. (1959). Of land and men: The birth and growth of an idea. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.beal/oflndmen0001&id=1&collection=beal&index=beal
   Google Scholar
• Falleti, T. G., & Lynch, J. F. (2009). Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 1143–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 206 (West 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (n.d.). Consumer price index for all urban consumers: All items (CPIAUCNS) (Federal reserve economic data). St. Louis, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCNS
   Google Scholar
• Fellom v. Redevelopment Agency of City and County of San Francisco, 320 P.2d 884 (Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1958).
   Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, W. B. (1995, December 31). The redevelopment battle: Housing vs. commercial use. Los Angeles Times, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, W. B., & Shigley, P. (2005). Guide to California planning (3rd ed.). Point Arena, CA: Solano Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, W. B., & Shigley, P. (2012). Guide to California planning (4th ed.). Point Arena, CA: Solano Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M. I. (1975). A nation of cities: The federal government and urban America, 1933–1965. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillette, H., Jr. (1983). The evolution of neighborhood planning: From the Progressive Era to the 1949 Housing Act. Journal of Urban History, 9, 421–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladfelder, J. (1968). California’s emergent counties. Sacramento, CA: County Supervisors Association of California.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, T. (1972, 9 July). Council takes control of redevelopment unit. Los Angeles Times, p. SE2.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. The American Political Science Review, 98, 243–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S. (2005). Policy drift: The hidden politics of U.S. welfare state retrenchment. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 40–82). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S., Pierson, P., & Thelen, K. (2015). Drift and conversion: Hidden faces of institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Advances in comparative-historical analysis (pp. 180–208). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell-Moroney, M. (2008). The Tiebout hypothesis 50 years later: Lessons and lingering challenges for metropolitan governance in the 21st century. Public Administration Review, 68, 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2009). Large redevelopment initiatives, housing values and gentrification: The case of the Atlanta Beltline. Urban Studies, 46, 1723–1745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keitel, S. A. (1967, June 11). Building boom in Cerritos. Los Angeles Times, p. J1.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16, 223–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, L. (1975, December 18). Storm grows over renewal agencies. Los Angeles Times, p. se1.
   Google Scholar
• Lefcoe, G. (2001). Finding the blight that’s right for California redevelopment law. Hastings Law Journal, 52, 991–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefcoe, G., & Swenson, C. W. (2014). Redevelopment in California: The demise of TIF-funded redevelopment in California and its aftermath. National Tax Journal, 67, 719–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Man, J. Y. (2001). Determinants of the municipal decision to adopt tax increment financing. In C. L. Johnson & J. Y. Man (Eds.), Tax increment financing and economic development: Uses, structures, and impacts (pp. 87–109). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A. (2004). Shifting ground: The rise and fall of the Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency. Southern California Quarterly, 86, 241–290.
   Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, J. D. (1945). City building and renewal. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 242, 96–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnick, R. S. (1994). Between the lines: Interpreting welfare rights. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. J. (1981). Cities by contract: The politics of municipal incorporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Population Center. (2011). National historical geographic information system: Version 2.0. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.nhgis.org
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, J. B., & Hayward, G. (1978). School finance in California: Pre-Serrano to the present. Journal of Education Finance, 3, 386–401.
   Google Scholar
• Molho, S. B., & Kanner, G. (1977). Urban renewal: Laissez-faire for the poor, welfare for the rich. Pacific Law Journal, 8, 627–697.
   Google Scholar
• Musso, J. A. (2001). The political economy of city formation in California: Limits to Tiebout sorting. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 139–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Controller, State of California. (1974). Annual report of assessed valuation and tax rates as of September 1973 of the counties of California for the fiscal year 1973–74. Sacramento, CA : Office of the Controller, State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Controller, State of California. (1975a). 1973–74 Annual report, financial transactions concerning cities of California. Sacramento, CA: Office of the Controller, State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Controller, State of California. (1975b). 1973–74 Annual report, financial transactions concerning school districts of California. Sacramento, CA: Office of the Controller, State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Controller, State of California. (1986). Annual report 1984–85, financial transactions concerning community redevelopment agencies of California. Sacramento, CA: Office of the Controller, State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Controller, State of California. (1989). Annual report 1987–88, financial transactions concerning community redevelopment agencies of California. Sacramento, CA: Office of the Controller, State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Controller, State of California. (1990). Annual report 1988–89, financial transactions concerning community redevelopment agencies of California. Sacramento, CA: Office of the Controller, State of California.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, M. (2012). The 2012–13 budget: Unwinding redevelopment. Sacramento, CA: Legislative Analyst’s Office. Retrieved from http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/general_govt/unwinding-redevelopment-021712.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pacewicz, J. (2016). The city as a fiscal derivative: Financialization, urban development, and the politics of earmarking. City & Community, 15, 264–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penman, V. (1974, March 13). Lee looks to redevelopment agency for capital improvements funds. The Community Advocate & Artesia News, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E. (1995). The price of federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Ralph Andersen and Associates. (1984). The use of redevelopment and tax increment financing by cities and counties: Prepared for the California debt advisory commission. Sacramento, CA: California Debt Advisory Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Rast, J. (2012). Why history (still) matters time and temporality in urban political analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 48, 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redevelopment Agency of City of Sacramento v. Modell, 2 Cal.Rptr. 245 (Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1960).
   Google Scholar
• Redevelopment Agency of San Francisco v. Hayes, 266 P.2d 105 (Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1954)
   Google Scholar
• Rich, M. J. (1993). Federal policymaking and the poor: National goals, local choices, and distributional outcomes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rocco, P., & Thurston, C. (2014). From metaphors to measures: Observable indicators of gradual institutional change. Journal of Public Policy, 34, 35–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodda, R. (1972, November 29). Assembly adopts “last chance” tax-shift measure; senate may balk. Sacramento Bee, p. A4.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (1983). The genesis of silicon valley. Built Environment (1978–), 9, 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D., Hoene, C. W., & Erie, S. P. (2002). Fiscal constraints and the loss of home rule the long-term impacts of California’s post-Proposition 13 fiscal regime. The American Review of Public Administration, 32, 423–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1993). The antigrowth entrepreneur: Challenging the “equilibrium” of the growth machine. The Journal of Politics, 55, 720–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. (1993). Technopolis: High-technology industry and regional development in Southern California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Citrin, J. (1985). Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Local Government Committee, California State Legislature. (1974). [Redevelopment, hearing] San Francisco, Calif., November 31, 1974. Senate Local Government Committee, California State Legislature.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Local Government Committee, California State Legislature. (1975). [Transcript of proceedings. Hearings on redevelopment tax increment financing] Baldwin Park, Calif., March 14, 1975. Senate Local Government Committee, California State Legislature.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano v. Priest, 487 P.2d 1241 (Cal. 1971).
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, T. A., Sheffrin, S. M., & O’Sullivan, A. (1999). Proposition 13: Unintended effects and feasible reforms. National Tax Journal, 52(1), 99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, J. F., & Barbour, E. (1999). The state-local fiscal relationship in California: A changing balance of power. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_1299FSR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• A sound redevelopment plan: Council viewpoint. (1952, October 23). Los Angeles Times, p. A4.
   Google Scholar
• State of California, Department of Finance. (2013). Historical census populations of counties and incorporated cities in California, 1850–2010. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Department of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• State of California, Department of State. (1952a). Proposed amendments to constitution, propositions and proposed laws together with arguments, to be submitted to the electors of the State of California at the general election, Tuesday, Nov. 4, 1952. Sacramento, CA: California State Printing Office. Retrieved from http://repository.uchastings.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1543&context=ca_ballot_props
   Google Scholar
• State of California, Department of State. (1952b). Statement of vote, general election, November 1952. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Department of State.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 3–39). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetwater Valley Civic Association v. City of National City, 555 P.2d 1099 (Cal. 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. D. (2000). When finance leads planning: Urban planning, highway planning, and metropolitan freeways in California. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20, 196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teaford, J. C. (1990). The rough road to renaissance: Urban revitalization in America, 1940–1985. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (2003). How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 208–240). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. (1945, June 4). Legislature faced by mass of bills. Oakland Tribune, p. D3.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1972). Population of places of 2,500 or more: 1970 and 1960. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015056504445
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1973). U.S. census of population: 1970: Vol. I. Characteristics of the population. Part 6, California. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2008). County and city data book [United States] consolidated file: City data, 1944–1977. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) [distributor]. Retrieved from http://10.3886/ICPSR07735.v1
   Google Scholar
• von Hoffman, A. (2008). The lost history of urban renewal. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1, 281–301.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. A. (1985). The origins and legacy of urban renewal. In J. P. Mitchell (Ed.), Federal housing policy and programs: past and present (pp. 253–276). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. A. (1987). The rise of the community builders: The American real estate industry and urban land planning. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickert, D. (1985). Some school finance issues related to the implementation of serrano and proposition 13. Journal of Education Finance, 10, 535–542.
   Google Scholar