Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference?

References

• Agger, A., & Sørensen, E. (2014). Designing collaborative policy innovation: Lessons from a Danish municipality. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Public innovation through collaboration and design (pp. 170–208). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2006). Bridge the gap: From spatial planning to strategic projects. European Planning Studies, 14, 1487–1500. doi:10.1080/09654310600852464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albury, D. (2005). Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money & Management, 25, 51–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpkan, L., Bulut, C., Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., & Kilic, K. (2010). Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance. Management Decision, 48, 732–755. doi:10.1108/00251741011043902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anheier, H. K., & Korreck, S. (2013). Governance innovations. Retrieved from https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/frontdoor/index/index/docId/733
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2014). Public innovation through collaboration and design. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C., & Carstensen, H. V. (2002). Powering collaborative policy innovation: Can innovation labs help? The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 17, 2–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2011). An innovative public sector? Embarking on the innovation journey. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos, & B. Steijn (Eds.), Innovation in the public sector: Linking capacity and leadership (pp. 197–221). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (2005). The information ecology of e-government: e-Government as institutional and technological innovation in public administration. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (2007). The myths of e-government: Looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government. Information Society, 23, 373–382. doi:10.1080/01972240701572913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogaard, L. (2017). The impact of innovation training on successful outcomes in public–private partnerships. Public Management Review, 19(8), 1–22. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1272710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. (2007). The adoption and implementation of a service innovation in a social work setting—A case study of family group conferencing in the UK. Social Policy and Society, 6, 321–332. doi:10.1017/S147474640700365X
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L., & Osborne, S. P. (2013). Risk and innovation. Public Management Review, 15(2), 186–208. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.707681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23–48. doi:10.1257/jep.14.4.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bysted, R., & Hansen, J. R. (2015). Comparing public and private sector employees’ innovative behaviour: Understanding the role of job and organizational characteristics, job types, and subsectors. Public Management Review, 17, 698–717. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bysted, R., & Jespersen, K. R. (2014). Exploring managerial mechanisms that influence innovative work behaviour: Comparing private and public employees. Public Management Review, 16, 217–241. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.806576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caragliu, A., Bo, C. D., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82. doi:10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavenago, D., Trivellato, B., & Gascó-Hernández, M. (2015). Making Milan a smart city: An emerging strategy of innovation in governance. In P. D. L. Julnes & E. Gibson (Eds.), Innovation in the public and nonprofit sectors: A public solutions handbook (pp. 110–128). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2007). Innovation and innovators inside government: From institutions to networks. Governance, 20, 581–607. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., & Alexander, D. (2009). Networks, innovation and public policy: Politicians, bureaucrats and the pathways to change inside government. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational size and innovation. Organization Studies, 13, 375–402. doi:10.1177/017084069201300304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. G. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research Agenda. Public Administration, 94, 146–166. doi:10.1111/padm.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gago, D., & Rubalcaba, L. (2007). Innovation and ICT in service firms: Towards a multidimensional approach for impact assessment. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 25–44. doi:10.1007/s00191-006-0030-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascó, M. (2016). What makes a city smart? Lessons from Barcelona. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Science, January, Kauau, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Gavaldà, J., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2012). Barcelona 5.0: From knowledge to smartness? Retrieved from http://journal-of-conflictology.uoc.edu/index.php/in3-working-paper-series/article/view/1590
   Google Scholar
• Gieske, H., van Buuren, A., & Bekkers, V. (2016). Conceptualizing public innovative capacity: A framework for assessment. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 21, 2–25.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. (2007). Heterogeneous and homogeneous groups in the innovation process. Oldenburg Studies for Europeanisation and Transnational Regulation, 5(16), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 123–143. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54. doi:10.2307/1251742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantunen, A. (2005). Knowledge‐processing capabilities and innovative performance: An empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8, 336–349. doi:10.1108/14601060510610199
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. R. (2013). The innovation imperative: An analysis of the ethics of the imperative to innovate in public sector service delivery. Public Management Review, 16, 67–89. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.790274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karo, E., & Kattel, R. (2015). Innovation bureaucracy: Does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation? Lund, Sweden: Lund University, CIRCLE-Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy. Retrieved from http://0-www.sussex.ac.uk.skyline.ucdenver.edu/spru/documents/kattel–karo-kattel-spru.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karo, E., & Kattel, R. (2016). How to organize for innovation: Entrepreneurial state and organizational variety (Working papers in technology governance and economic dynamics no. 66). Tallinn, Estonia: Nurkse School, Tallinn University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., Cepilovs, A., Kalvet, T., Lember, V., & Tõnurist, P. (2015). Public sector innovation indicators: Towards a new evaluative framework (LIPSE Research Reports No. 6). Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from http://lipse.org/userfiles/uploads/LIPSE%20WP1%20Research%20Report_11.2014_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kobrak, P. (1996). The social responsibilities of a public entrepreneur. Administration & Society, 28, 205–237. doi:10.1177/009539979602800203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor, Y. Y., & Leblebici, H. (2005). How do interdependencies among human-capital deployment, development, and diversification strategies affect firms’ financial performance? Strategic Management Journal, 26, 967–985. doi:10.1002/smj.485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M., Considine, M., & Alexander, D. (2011). Innovation inside government: The importance of networks. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos, & B. Steijn (Eds.), Innovation in the public sector: Linking capacity and leadership. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2014). The governance report 2014 (1st ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mariano, S., & Casey, A. (2015). Is organizational innovation always a good thing? Management Learning, 46(5), 1–16. doi:10.1177/1350507615569429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, R., & McClelland, J. (2002). Individual and team‐based idea generation within innovation management: Organisational and research agendas. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(2), 86–97. doi:10.1108/14601060210428186
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2014). From hero-innovators to distributed heroism: An in-depth analysis of the role of individuals in public sector innovation. Public Management Review, 16, 199–216. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.806575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naphade, M., Banavar, G., Harrison, C., Paraszczak, J., & Morris, R. (2011). Smarter cities and their innovation challenges. Computer, 44(6), 32–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., Raine, J., & Skelcher, C. (2001). Developments: Transforming local government: Innovation and modernization. Public Money & Management, 21(2), 61–68. doi:10.1109/MC.2011.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, A., Roos, G., & Vickers-Willis, T. (2007). Evaluating an Australian public policy organization’s innovation capacity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10, 532–558. doi:10.1108/14601060710828817
   Google Scholar
• Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36, 499–515. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puttick, R., Baeck, P., & Colligan, P. (2014). i-Teams: The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. London, UK: Nesta and Bloomberg Philanthropies.
   Google Scholar
• Ricard, L. M., Klijn, E. H., Lewis, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2017). Assessing public leadership styles for innovation: A comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona. Public Management Review, 19(2), 134–156. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1148192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Scapens, R. W. (1990). Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods. The British Accounting Review, 22(3), 259–281. doi:10.1016/0890-8389(90)90008-6
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, D., & Tõnurist, P. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: Exploring the characteristics and potential of living labs and innovation labs. Paper presented at the Open Living Lab Days 2016, August, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk-taking in organizational decision-making. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 562–585. doi:10.2307/256224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2012). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 17, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Spiezia, V. (2011). Are ICT users more innovative? OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2011, 1–21. doi:10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kg2d2hkn6vg
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In M. H. Zack (Ed.), Knowledge and strategy (pp. 77–116). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2015). Discovering innovation labs in the public sector (Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics No. 61). Tallinn, Estonia: Nurkse School, Tallinn University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: What they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19, 1455–1479. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. G., & Knies, E. (2013). Leadership and meaningful work in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 73, 859–868. doi:10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Voet, J., Ysa, T., Gascó, M., & Albareda, A. (2015). The leadership of innovation in public sector networks: Innovation perceptions and innovation seeking behavior. Birmingham, England: International Research Society for Public Management.
   Google Scholar
• Vissers, G., & Dankbaar, B. (2002). Creativity in multidisciplinary new product development teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11, 31–42. doi:10.1111/1467-8691.00234
   Google Scholar
• Voets, J., & De Rynck, F. (2011). Exploring the innovative capactiy of intergovernmental network managers: The art of boundary-scanning and boundary-spanning. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos, & B. Steijn (Eds.), Innovation in the public sector: Linking capacity and leadership. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (2009). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 1, 29–40. doi:10.1260/175722209787951224
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Flemig, S., Timeus, K., Tõnurist, P., & Tummers, L. (2017). Does co-creation impact public service delivery? The importance of state and governance traditions. Public Money & Management, 37, 365–372. doi:10.1080/09540962.2017.1328798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17, 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. (2006). Innovation type and diffusion: An empirical analysis of local government. Public Administration, 84, 311–335. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80, 103–124. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zenker, S., Eggers, F., & Farsky, M. (2013). Putting a price tag on cities: Insights into the competitive environment of places. Cities (London, England), 30, 133–139. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar