“Networked coalitions” as metropolitan governance: Lessons from the emergence of Australia’s Committees for Cities and Regions

References

• Addie, J. P. D. (2013). Metropolitics in motion: The dynamics of transportation and state reterritorialization in the Chicago and Toronto city-regions. Urban Geography, 34(2), 188–217. doi:10.1080/02723638.2013.778651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., Haughton, G., Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Soft spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders. New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2017). Gippsland. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/…/Gippsland%20(2016%20CED%20Profile).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Ruming, K. (2015). Making ‘Global Sydney’: Spatial imaginaries, worlding and strategic plans. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39, 62–78. doi:10.1111/ijur.v39.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A., & Papadopoulos, I. (Eds.). (2006). Governance and democracy: Comparing national, European and international experiences. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N., & Bytzek, E. (2009). Government congruence and intergovernmental relations in federal systems. Regional & Federal Studies, 19(3), 371–397. doi:10.1080/13597560902957484
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, N., & Bramwell, A. (2014). Governing urban economies: Innovation and inclusion in Canadian city-regions. In N. J. Bradford & A. Bramwell (Eds.), Innovation, creativity, and governance in Canadian City-regions (pp. 3–33). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (1999). Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies, 36(3), 431–451. doi:10.1080/0042098993466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447–488. doi:10.1080/0969229042000282864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunker, R., Freestone, R., & Randolph, B. (2018). Sydney: Growth, globalization and governance. In S. Hamnett & R. Freestone (Eds.), Planning metropolitan Australia (pp. 76–100). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, M. (2016). Problems and prospects for public transport planning in Australian cities. Built Environment, 42(1), 37–54. doi:10.2148/benv.42.1.37
   Google Scholar
• Buser, M. (2012). The production of space in metropolitan regions: A Lefebvrian analysis of governance and spatial change. Planning Theory, 11(3), 279–298. doi:10.1177/1473095212439693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA and Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Caulfield, J., & Wanna, J. (Eds.). (1995). Power and politics in the city: Brisbane in transition. South Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, N. (2012). Urban policy mobility, anti-politics, and histories of the transnational municipal movement. Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 25–43. doi:10.1177/0309132511407952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. E. (2017). Local place-based collaborative governance: Comparing state-centric and society-centered models. Urban Affairs Review, 53(3), 578–602. doi:10.1177/1078087416637126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, N. M., Dicken, P., & Hess, M. (2008). Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 271–295. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee for Perth. (2016). Committees for cities and regions. Perth, Australia: Committee for Perth. Retrieved from https://www.committeeforperth.com.au/assets/documents/C4-brochure-Aug-2016-Web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Committee for Sydney. (2016). Capturing the value of transport infrastructure. Submission to the Australian House of Representatives Standing Committee on Infrastructure, Transport and Cities. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Committees for Cities and Regional Network. (2016). Committees for cities and regions: An introduction. Retrieved from http://www.committeeforgeelong.com.au/media/35673/c4_brochure_2016_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Committees for Cities and Regions. (2013). Committees for cities and regions: A growing movement. Retrieved from http://www.committeeforperth.com.au/committees.html
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. (2001). Explaining urban regimes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), 7–19. doi:10.1111/ijur.2001.25.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), 47–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2009). Metropolitan governance and institutional collective action. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 356–377. doi:10.1177/1078087408324000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B., Darbas, T., & Lawson, S. (2004). Governance, sustainability and recent Australian metropolitan strategies: A socio‐theoretic analysis. Urban Policy and Research, 22(4), 345–366. doi:10.1080/0811114042000296290
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., & Hoyler, M. (2014). Governing the new metropolis. Urban Studies, 51(11), 2249–2266. doi:10.1177/0042098013500699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. doi:10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinelt, H., & Kübler, D. (2004). Metropolitan governance in the 21st century: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, M., Tangney, P., Reis, K., Grant-Smith, D., Heazle, M., Bosomworth, K., & Burton, P. (2015). Towards networked governance: Improving interagency communication and collaboration for disaster risk management and climate change adaptation in Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(5), 757–776. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.891974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. L., & Tremblay, D. G. (2010). Social actors and their role in metropolitan governance in Montréal: Towards an inclusive coalition? GeoJournal, 75(6), 567–579. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9270-0
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. (2017). Confidentiality, anonymity and power relations in elite interviewing: Conducting qualitative policy research in a politicised domain. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 93–103. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1123555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K., & Carr, J. B. (2010). Prospects for centralizing services in an Urban County: Evidence from eight self‐organized networks of local public services. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(4), 449–470. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00512.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G. (2011). Urban politics reconsidered: Growth machine to post-democratic city? Urban Studies, 48(12), 2629–2660. doi:10.1177/0042098011415715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. (2002). Hard and soft networks for urban competitiveness. Urban Studies, 39(5–6), 929–945. doi:10.1080/00420980220128381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangioni, V. (2018). Fiscal decentralisation and autonomy. In R. Tomlinson & M. Spiller (Eds.), Australia’s metropolitan imperative: An agenda for governance reform (pp. 175–192). Clayton, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2017). Governing urbanism: Urban governance studies 1.0, 2.0 and beyond. Urban Studies, 54(2), 312–326. doi:10.1177/0042098016670046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. (2003). Producing the capacity to govern in global Sydney: A multiscaled account. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), 201–223. doi:10.1111/1467-9906.t01-3-00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. (2005). Neoliberalist planning? Re-thinking and re-casting Sydney’s metropolitan planning. Geographical Research, 43(1), 59–70. doi:10.1111/ages.2005.43.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell-Weaver, C., Miller, D., & Deal, J. R. (2000). Multilevel governance and metropolitan regionalism in the USA. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 851–876. doi:10.1080/00420980050011127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., & Stoker, G. (2001). The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 36(6), 810–835. doi:10.1177/10780870122185109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouat, C. M., & Dodson, J. (2013). Reviewing the Auckland super-city: Towards an on-going agenda for evaluating super-city governance. Australian Planner, 50(2), 138–147. doi:10.1080/07293682.2013.776976
   Google Scholar
• Mouat, C. M., & Dodson, J. (2014). ‘Governance by re-bordering’: Comparing re-bordering as spatial governance strategy in Auckland, Brisbane/ SEQ,Vancouver, London, and Manchester. In W. Steele, T. Alizadeh, L. Eslami-Andargoli, & S. Serrao-Neumann (Eds.), Planning across borders in a climate of change (pp. 107–122). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelles, J., Gross, J. S., & Kennedy, L. (2018). The role of governance networks in building metropolitan scale. Territory, Politics, Governance, 6(2), 159–181. doi:10.1080/21622671.2017.1421478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyseth, T. (2008). Network governance in contested urban landscapes. Planning Theory & Practice, 9(4), 497–514. doi:10.1080/14649350802481488
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. (2012). Soft spaces as vehicles for neoliberal transformations of strategic spatial planning? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(5), 910–923. doi:10.1068/c11241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2004). The Chinese axis: Zoning technologies and variegated sovereignty. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(1), 69–96. doi:10.1017/S1598240800004392
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, M. (2011). Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404. doi:10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemberton, S., & Searle, G. (2016). Statecraft, scalecraft and urban planning: A comparative study of Birmingham, UK, and Brisbane, Australia. European Planning Studies, 24(1), 76–95. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1078297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillimore, J., & Fenna, A. (2017). Intergovernmental councils and centralization in Australian federalism. Regional & Federal Studies, 27(5), 597–621. doi:10.1080/13597566.2017.1389723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. (2014). Can urban regimes travel in time and space? Urban regime theory, urban governance theory, and comparative urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 50(6), 864–889. doi:10.1177/1078087413518175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porio, E. (2012). Decentralisation, power and networked governance practices in Metro Manila. Space and Polity, 16(1), 7–27. doi:10.1080/13562576.2012.698128
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. (2014). The Sydney metropolitan strategy as a zoning technology: Analyzing the spatial and temporal dimensions of obsolescence. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1), 108–127. doi:10.1068/d20912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. J., Gurran, N., Maginn, P. J., & Goodman, R. (2014). A national planning agenda? Unpacking the influence of federal urban policy on state planning reform. Australian Planner, 51, 108–121. doi:10.1080/07293682.2014.894105
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H., & Vogel, R. K. (2009). Regionalism and urban politics. In J. S. Davies & D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 106–124). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, G. (1996). Sydney as a global city. NSW Department of Urban Affairs and Planning and NSW Department of State and Regional Development. Sydney, Australia: Seek. Retrieved from https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/15938467?selectedversion=NBD12822273.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, G., & Bunker, R. (2010). Metropolitan strategic planning: An Australian paradigm? Planning Theory, 9(3), 163–180. doi:10.1177/1473095209357873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigler, T. (2012). Globalising Australian cities: An overview. In 36th Annual Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Regional Science Association International (ANZRSAI) (pp. 259–272). Wollongong, Australia: AERU Research Unit. doi:10.1111/jce.12062
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the web of group affiliations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1), 1–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.1993.tb00300.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanstrom, T. (1996). Ideas matter: Reflections on the new regionalism. Cityscape, 2(2), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42, 1991–2006. doi:10.1080/00420980500279869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. J., & Thrift, N. (1980). Large corporations and concentrations of capital in Australia: A geographical analysis. Economic Geography, 56(4), 261–280. doi:10.2307/143325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J., Derudder, B., Faulconbridge, J., Hoyler, M., & Ni, P. (2014). Advanced producer service firms as strategic networks, global cities as strategic places. Economic Geography, 90(3), 267–291. doi:10.1111/ecge.2014.90.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teller, D., & Goddard, T. (2006). Creating space for CSR in Melbourne. In J. Jonker & M. De Witte (Eds.), Management models for corporate social responsibility (pp. 106–116). Berlin, Germany; Heidelberg, Germany; and New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2012). The local politics of policy mobility: Learning, persuasion, and the production of a municipal sustainability fix. Environment and Planning A, 44(6), 1389–1406. doi:10.1068/a44314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. doi:10.1086/257839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomàs, M. (2011). Exploring the metropolitan trap: The case of Montreal. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 554–567. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01066.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, R. (2017). An argument for metropolitan government in Australia. Cities, 63, 149–153. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, R. (2018). Overview: A metropolitan reform agenda for Australia’s cities. In R. Tomlinson & M. Spiller (Eds.), Australia’s metropolitan imperative: An agenda for governance reform (pp. 1–12). Clayton, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K., & Jonas, A. E. (2004). Competitive city-regionalism as a politics of space: A critical reinterpretation of the new regionalism. Environment and Planning A, 36(12), 2119–2139. doi:10.1068/a36223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzstein, S. (2013). Urban economic governance, business and globalisation: Australasia’s ‘Committee-for-[City]’ phenomenon. Geography Compass, 7, 385–397. doi:10.1111/gec3.12044
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. M. (2002). The new regionalism: Key characteristics of an emerging movement. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68, 267–278. doi:10.1080/01944360208976272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar