Commoning toward urban resilience: The role of trust, social cohesion, and involvement in a simulated urban commons setting

References

• Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., & Eriksen, S. (2005). New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Anderies, J. M. (2014). Embedding built environments in social-ecological systems: Resilience-based design principles. Building Research and Information, 42(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.857455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, P. (2014). The leisure commons: A spatial history of Web 2.0. Routledge Studies in Science, Technology and Society, xvii(27), 189. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315772608
   Google Scholar
• Baggio, J. A., Barnett, A. J., Perez-Ibara, I., Brady, U., Ratajczyk, E., Rollins, N., Rubiños, C., Shin, H., Yu, D., Aggarwal, R., & Janssen, M. A. (2016). Explaining success and failure in the commons: The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balbi, S., & Giupponi, C. (2011). Reviewing agent-based modelling of socio-ecosystems: A methodology for the analysis of climate change adaptation and sustainability. SSRN Electronic Journal, (15_09). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1457625
   Google Scholar
• Bendt, P., Barthel, S., & Colding, J. (2013). Civic greening and environmental learning in public-access community gardens in Berlin. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1992). A systems perspective on the interrelations between natural, human-made and cultural capital. Ecological Economics, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(92)90017-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (Eds.). (2015). Patterns of commoning. Commons Strategy Group and Off the Common Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borch, C., & Kornberger, M. (2015). Urban commons: Rethinking the city. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo, G., Squazzoni, F., & Boero, R. (2012). Trust and partner selection in social networks: An experimentally grounded model. Social Networks, 34(4), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnihan, P., & Byrne, M. (2015). Escape into the city: Everyday practices of commoning and the production of urban space in Dublin. Antipode, 47(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruun, M. H. (2015). Communities and the commons: Open access and community ownership of the urban commons. In C. Borch & M. Kornberger (Eds.), Urban commons: Rethinking the city (pp. 153–170). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A. R. H. (2013). Collective action in UK urban community growing projects: A comparative analysis. Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. K., Svendsen, E. S., & Roman, L. A. (2016). Knowledge co-production at the research–practice interface: Embedded case studies from urban forestry. Environmental Management, 57(6), 1262–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0680-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camps-Calvet, M., Langemeyer, J., Calvet-Mir, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & March, H. (2015). Sowing resilience and contestation in times of crises: The case of urban gardening movements in Barcelona. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 8(2), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v8i2p417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalise, N. (2015). Collective action dynamics in urban neighborhoods: A study of urban community gardens. Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J., DuBois, B., & Tidball, K. G. (2015). Refuges of local resilience: Community gardens in post-Sandy New York City. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, D. (2012). At the community garden, it’s community that’s the hard part. National Public Radio.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. (2016). Building transitions to post-capitalist urban commons. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(4), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C., & Giamarino, C. (2019). Creativity, conviviality, and civil society in neoliberalizing public space: Changing politics and discourses in skateboarder activism from New York City to Los Angeles. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 43(6), 462–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723519842219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. E. (2017). Local place-based collaborative governance: Comparing state-centric and society-centered models. Urban Affairs Review, 53(3), 578–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416637126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colding, J., & Barthel, S. (2013). The potential of “urban green commons” in the resilience building of cities. Ecological Economics, 86, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colding, J., Barthel, S., Bendt, P., Snep, R., van der Knaap, W., & Ernstson, H. (2013). Urban green commons: Insights on urban common property systems. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsín Jiménez, A., & Estalella, A. (2013). The atmospheric person: Value, experiment, and “making neighbors” in Madrid’s popular assemblies. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.2.008
   Google Scholar
• De Kam, G., & Needham, B. (2004). Een hele opgave: Over sociale cohesie als motief bij stedelijke herstructurering [Quite a task: About social cohesion as a motive in urban restructuring]. DGW/Nethur Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, L., & Lawson, L. J. (2015). Results of a US and Canada community garden survey: Shared challenges in garden management amid diverse geographical and organizational contexts. Agriculture and Human Values, 32(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9558-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchemin, E., Wegmuller, F., & Legault, A.-M. (2009). Urban agriculture: Multi-dimensional tools for social development in poor neighbourhoods. Field Actions Science Reports, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5194/facts-2-1-2009.
   Google Scholar
• Elmqvist, T., Andersson, E., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., Olsson, P., Gaffney, O., Takeuchi, K., & Folke, C. (2019). Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nature Sustainability, 2(4), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euler, J. (2018). Conceptualizing the commons: Moving beyond the goods-based definition by introducing the social practices of commoning as vital determinant. Ecological Economics, 143, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eves, F., Hoppé, R., & McLaren, L. (2007). Prediction of specific types of physical activity using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 8(2), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2003.tb00086.x
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, A., Ghorbani, A., & Herder, P. (in press). Diversity and challenges of the urban commons: A comprehensive review. International Journal of the Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, A., Hooijschuur, E., Rogge, N., Ghorbani, A., & Herder, P. (2020). Sustaining collective action in urban community gardens. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behaviour: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Colding, J., & Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis: Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, 9(1), 352–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511541957.020
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, S. R. (2011). Collective action and the urban commons. Notre Dame Law Review, 87(1), 57–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2016). The city as a commons. Yale Law and Policy Review, 34(281). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?Abstract_id=2653084
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2019). Ostrom in the city: Design principles and practices for the urban commons. In B. Hudson, J. Rosenbloom, & D. Cole (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the study of the commons (pp. 235–255). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315162782-19
   Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E. (2004). Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, A., & Bravo, G. (2016). Managing the commons: A simple model of the emergence of institutions through collective action. International Journal of the Commons, 10(1), 200–219. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, N., & Martin, W. E. (1952). On group cohesiveness. The American Journal of Sociology, 57(6), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1086/221041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guitart, D., Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2012). Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(4), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities. From the right to the city to the right to the urban revolution (Vol. 40). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, S., & Whatmore, S. (2006). Living cities: Towards a politics of conviviality. Science as Culture, 15(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430600707988
   Google Scholar
• Huron, A. (2015). Working with strangers in saturated space: Reclaiming and maintaining the urban commons. Antipode, 47(4), 963–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., & Lim, U. (2016). Urban resilience in climate change adaptation: A conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8(405), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040405
   Google Scholar
• Kingsley, J. Y., Townsend, M., & Henderson-Wilson, C. (2009). Cultivating health and wellbeing: Members’ perceptions of the health benefits of a port Melbourne community garden. Leisure Studies, 28(2), 207–219. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02614360902769894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumineau, F., & Malhotra, D. (2011). Trust and collaboration in the aftermath of conflict: The effects of contract structure. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 981–998. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macal, C. M., & North, M. J. (2009). Agent-based modeling and simulation. Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 86–98). https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2009.5429318.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. R. (2008). Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local scale. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.50
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: Initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230
   Google Scholar
• McShane, I. (2010). Trojan horse or adaptive institutions? Some reflections on urban commons in Australia. Urban Policy and Research, 28(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140903487711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. (2015). The city is not a Menschenpark. In C. Borch & M. Kornberger (Eds.), Urban commons: Rethinking the city (pp. 32–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Milburn, L.-A. S., & Vail, B. A. (2010). Sowing the seeds of success. Cultivating a future for community gardens. Landscape Journal, 29(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.29.1.71
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T. (2014). Spatiality of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mui, L. (2002). Computational models of trust and reputation : Agents, evolutionary games, and social networks. Social networks [ Doctoral dissertation], Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mundoli, S., Manjunatha, B., & Nagendra, H. (2017). Commons that provide: The importance of Bengaluru’s wooded groves for urban resilience. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 9(2), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2016.1264404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagendra, H., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Applying the social-ecological system framework to the diagnosis of urban lake commons in Bangalore, India. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06582-190267
   Google Scholar
• Okvat, H. A., & Zautra, A. J. (2011). Community gardening: A parsimonious path to individual, community, and environmental resilience. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(3–4), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9404-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, I. C. (1991). Gardening’s socioeconomic impacts. Journal of Extension, 29(4), 7–8. Retrieved December 2, 2020 from http://www.joe.org/joe/1991winter/a1.html
   Google Scholar
• Petrescu, D., Petcou, C., & Baibarac, C. (2016). Co-producing commons-based resilience: Lessons from R-urban. Building Research and Information, 44(7), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., & Armitage, D. (2007). A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004). Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: The role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change, 35(3), 435–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, M., Blair, N., & Davison, K. (2018). Articulating a social-ecological resilience agenda for urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 23(4), 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1440176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radywyl, N., & Bigg, C. (2013). Reclaiming the commons for urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resilience Alliance. (2010). Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems - A workbook for scientists. Version 2.0. https://www.resalliance.org/resilience-assessment
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, N. (2020). Collective action theory and urban gardens [Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg]. https://dx.doi.org/10.25673/32751
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, N., Theesfeld, I., & Strassner, C. (2018). Social sustainability through social interaction-A national survey on community gardens in Germany. Sustainability, 10(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. B. (2012). Cosmopolitics: The kiss of life. New Formations, 76(76), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.76.07.2012
   Google Scholar
• Ruggeri, G., Mazzocchi, C., & Corsi, S. (2016). Urban gardeners’ motivations in a metropolitan city: The case of Milan. Sustainability, 8(11), 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusch, L. (2010). Rethinking bridging: Risk and trust in multiracial community organizing. Urban Affairs Review, 45(4), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409351946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2015). Who owns our cities – And why this urban takeover should concern us all. Retrieved October 6, 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/nov/24/who-owns-our-cities-and-why-this-urban-takeover-should-concern-us-all
   Google Scholar
• Scharf, N., Wachtel, T., Reddy, S. E., & Säumel, I. (2019). Urban commons for the edible city—First insights for future sustainable urban food systems from Berlin, Germany. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040966
   Google Scholar
• Schauppenlehner-Kloyber, E., & Penker, M. (2016). Between participation and collective action—From occasional liaisons towards long-term co-management for urban resilience. Sustainability, 8(7), 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelzkopf, K. (2002). Incommensurability, land use, and the right to space: Community gardens in New York City. Urban Geography, 23(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.23.4.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A., & Garg, A. (2017). Urban commons service generation, delivery, and management: A conceptual framework. Ecological Economics, 135, 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1994). Bridge and door. Theory, Culture & Society, 11(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327694011001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simondon, G. (1989). L’individuation psychique et collective à la lumière des notions de forme, information, potentiel et métastabilité [Psychic and collective individuation in the light of notions of form, information, potential and metastability]. Aubier.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, N. (2017). Becoming a commoner: The commons as sites for affective socio-nature encounters and co-becomings. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 17(4), 751–776.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Ostrom, E., & Stonich, S. (2002). Knowledge and questions after 15 years of research. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 445–489). The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susser, I., & Tonnelat, S. (2013). Transformative cities: The three urban commons. Focaal, 2013(66), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2013.660110
   Google Scholar
• Tisue, S., & Wilensky, U. (2004). Netlogo: A simple environment for modeling complexity. International conference on complex systems, 21, 16–21. http://www.ccl.sesp.northwestern.edu/papers/netlogo-iccs2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133308089372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dam, K. H., Nikolic, I., & Lukszo, Z. (2012). Agent-based modelling of socio-technical systems (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Veen, E. J., Bock, B. B., Van den Berg, W., Visser, A. J., & Wiskerke, J. S. (2016). Community gardening and social cohesion: Different designs, different motivations. Local Environment, 21(10), 1271–1287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1101433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercauteren, C., Quist, J., van Bueren, E., & Veen, E. (2013). Community gardens as learning spaces for sustainable food practices. SCORAI Europe workshop proceedings, Rotterdam, Netherlands. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:a6090c6e-7127-4b35-8186-3a83e74345b1
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179–198). Springer London.
   Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, S. (2014). “Being open, but sometimes closed.” Conviviality in a super-diverse London neighbourhood. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413510415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. J. (2018). Urban commons are more-than-property. Geographical Research, 56(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. S., Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. E. (2013). Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 90(S), S21–S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P., & Landry, C. (2008). The intercultural city: Planning for diversity advantage. Routledge.
   Google Scholar