Social inclusion through mixed-income development: Design and practice in the Choice Neighborhoods Initiative

References

• Amath, N. (2015). Australian Muslim civil society organisations: Pathways to social inclusion. Journal of Social Inclusion, 6(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.36251/josi.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, P., & Seddon, J. (2008). Socially inclusive practice. In T. Stickley & T. Basset (Eds.), Learning about mental health practice (pp. 253–270). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. S. (2005). Social mixing and the geography of opportunity: Lessons for policy and unanswered questions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, P. C., & Smith, R. N. (1997). Mixed income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 3(2), 3–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41486509
   Google Scholar
• Brower, S. (2009). The feasibility of mixed-income communities. Presented at the international symposium jointly organized by the IAPS-CSBE Network and the IAPS Housing Network, Istanbul, Turkey: University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Brownill, S., & Carpenter, J. (2007). Increasing participation in planning: Emergent experiences of the reformed planning system in England. Practice Forum, 22(4), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701770134
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2010). Building “community” in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches, and early experiences. Urban Affairs, 45(3), 299–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409341544
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2013). The new public housing stigma in mixed-income developments. In Chicago School of Social Service Administration research brief (pp. 1–16).
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2015). Integrating the inner city: The promise and perils of mixed-income public housing transformation. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., Khare, A., & Joseph, M. (2012). Participation, deliberation, and decision making: The dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in mixed-income developments. Urban Affairs Review, 48(6), 863–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412450151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Hendren, N., Jones, M. R., & Porter, S. R. (2018). The opportunity atlas: Mapping the childhood roots of social mobility (No. w25147). National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Choice Neighborhoods 2015 Grantee Report. (2015). U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Choice Neighborhoods Implementation Grants Budget Guidance. (2018). U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Clampet-Lundquist, S., & Massey, D. S. (2004). Neighborhood effects on economic self-sufficiency: A reconsideration of the Moving to Opportunity experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 114(1), 107–143. https://doi.org/10.1086/588740
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Derian, A. (2016). How can services for families with children in choice neighborhoods be improved? Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ellickson, R. C. (2010). The false promise of the mixed-income housing project. UCLA Law Review, 57, 983–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferdman, B. M. (2014). The practice of inclusion in diverse organizations: Toward a systemic and inclusive framework. In B. M. Ferdman & B. R. Deane (Eds.), Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion (pp. 3–54). Jossey-Bass Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Findler, L., Wind, L., & Mor-Barak, M. E. (2007). The challenge of workforce management in a global society. Administration in Social Work, 31(3), 63–94. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v31n03_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L., & Rouse, M. (2009). The inclusive practice project in Scotland: Teacher education for inclusive education. Teacher and Teacher Education, 25(4), 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, J., DeFilippis, J., & Bazuin, J. (2012). HOPE VI: Calling for modesty in its claims. In G. Bridge, T. Butler, & L. Lees (Eds.), Mixed communities: Gentrification by stealth? (pp. 209–229). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fylan, F. (2005). Semi-structured interviewing. A Handbook of Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(2), 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Marcotte, D. E., Mandell, M., Wolman, H., & Augustine, N. (2005). Neighborhood poverty during childhood and fertility, education, and earnings outcomes. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.231.411&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Galvez, M. (2013). An early assessment of off-site replacement housing, relocation planning and housing mobility counseling in HUD’s Choice Neighborhoods Initiative. Poverty & Race Research Action Council, Program Review.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin-Smith, I., & Hutchinson, C. L. (2015). Beyond supply and demand: Addressing the complexities of workforce exclusion in Australia. Journal of Social Inclusion, 6(1), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.36251/josi.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gress, T. H., Joseph, M. L., & Cho, S. (2019). Confirmations, new insights, and future implications for HOPE VI mixed-income redevelopment. Cityscape, 21(2), 185–212. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26696384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, J. (2010). Success by design: HOPE VI, new urbanism, and the neoliberal transformation of public housing in the United States. Environment and Planning, 42(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holvino, E., Ferdman, B., & Merrill-Sands, D. (2004). Creating and sustaining diversity and inclusion in organizations: Strategies and approaches. In M. S. Stockdale & F. J. Crosby (Eds.), The psychology and management of workplace diversity (pp. 245–276). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, A. D. B. (2010). The voices behind the bricks: An evaluation of youth participation in the Upper Land Park-Broadway Choice Neighborhoods Initiative [Masters Thesis]. University of California Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, R. (2016). From HOPE VI to choice neighborhoods: Let’s protect people’s health during housing redevelopment. Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M., & Chaskin, R. (2010). Living in a mixed-income development: Resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in Chicago. Urban Studies, 47(11), 2347–2366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L. (2013). “Cityscape” mixed-income symposium summary and response: Implications for antipoverty policy. Cityscape, 15(2), 215–221. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41959122
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L. (2019). Promoting poverty deconcentration and racial desegregation through mixed-income development. In M. W. Metzler & H. S. Webber (Eds.), Facing segregation: Housing policy solutions for a stronger society (pp. 146–172). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 369–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087406294043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khare, A. (2015). Putting people back into place-based public policies. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khare, A. (2016). Still swimming, tides rising: Community change, spatial interventions, and the challenge of federal place-based antipoverty public policies. In J. DeFilippis (Ed.), Urban policy in the time of Obama (pp. 181–198). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kochhar, R., & Fry, R. (2014). Wealth inequality has widened along racial, ethnic lines since end of great recession, (analysis of the 2013 survey of consumer finances by the Federal Reserve) (pp. 1–4). Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, R., & Kummitha, R. (2017). Social entrepreneurship and social inclusion: Processes, practices and prospects. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations: A guide to creating organizations inspired by the next stage of human consciousness. Nelson Parker.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E., & Patsios, D. (2007). The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion. Social Exclusion Task Force.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. K., McDade, Z., & Bertumen, K. (2013). Mixed-income living: Anticipated and realized benefits for low-income households. Cityscape, 15(2), 15–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41959107
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. (2003). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Key Methods in Geography, 3(2), 117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Lucio, J., & Wolfersteig, W. (2012). Political and social incorporation of public housing residents: Challenges in HOPE VI community development. Community Development, 43(4), 476–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2012.714392
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mor-Barak, M. E. (1999). Beyond affirmative action. Administration in Social Work, 23(3–4), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v23n03_04
   Google Scholar
• Mor-Barak, M. E., & Cherin, D. A. (1998). A tool to expand organizational understanding of workforce diversity. Administration in Social Work, 22(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v22n01_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3(1), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morse, J. M., & Fiels, P. A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Initiative on Mixed Income Communities. (2013). State of the field scan #1: Social dynamics in mixed-income developments.
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam. (2017, January). An economy for the 99% (Oxfam Briefing Paper). 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., & Hendey, L. (2013). A brief look at the early implementation of choice neighborhoods. The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., Hendey, L., Turner, M. A., & Poethig, E. (2016). Revitalizing neighborhoods, the federal role. Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-9465-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Buron, L., Levy, D. K., & Cunningham, M. K. (2000). The Gautreaux legacy: What might mixed-income and dispersal strategies mean for the poorest public housing tenants? Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), 911–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2000.9521392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberson, Q. M. (2004). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion (CAHRS Working Paper #04-05). Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., Stroh, L. K., & Flynn, C. A. (1998). Lake Parc Place: A study of mixed‐income housing. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4).
   Google Scholar
• Saez, E. (2013). Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States (updated version). Pathways Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. (1992). Mental models. Planning Review, 20(2), 4–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054349
   Google Scholar
• Silver, H. (2015). The contexts of social inclusion (UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Working Paper), 144.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E. (2011). How to evaluate choice and promise neighborhoods. The Urban Institute Perspectives Brief (p. 19).
   Google Scholar
• Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. J. D., & Wilson, W. J. (1989). The cost of racial and class exclusion in the inner city. American Academy of Political and Social Science Annals, 501(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716289501001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, D. (1996). A brief look at US postwar income inequality. In Current Population Reports (pp. 60-191). US Bureau of the Census.
   Google Scholar