Eyewitness accounts: false facts, false memories, and false identification

References

• Bohrnstedt, G., and D.Knoke. 1994. Statistics for Social Data Analysis. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., and A.Schaefer. 2010. “The Effects of Conformity on Recognition Judgements for Emotional Stimuli.” Acta Psychologica133: 38–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS News. 2009. CBS Poll: What to Believe?CBS Worldwide, Inc. Accessed January 2013. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18559_162-13347.html.
   Google Scholar
• Center on Wrongful Convictions. n.d. “Northwestern Law, Bluhm Legal Clinic.” Northwestern University School of Law. Accessed January 12 2013. http://www.law.northwestern.edu/cwc/exonerations/ilbullocksummary.html.
   Google Scholar
• Couch, R.2013. “Evidence After Perry v. New Hampshire.” Michigan Law Review111: 1535–1546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, G., and S.Hine. 2007. “Change Blindness and Eyewitness Testimony.” The Journal of Psychology141 (4): 423–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidell, L., and B.Tabachnick. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., A.Memon, and K.Allan. 2003. “Memory Conformity: Can Eyewitnesses Influence Each Other's Memories for an Event?” Applied Cognitive Psychology17: 533–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., A.Memon, K.Allan, and D.Wright. 2004. “Say it to My Face: Examining the Effects of Socially Encountered Misinformation.” Legal and Criminological Psychology9 (2): 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L.2008. “Judging innocence.” Columbia Law Review108: 55–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, M. J., and K. M.Jacquin. 2007. “Juror Perceptions of Child Eyewitness Testimony in a Sexual Abuse Trial.” Journal of Child Sexual Abuse14 (2): 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Innocence Project. n.d. “Eyewitness Misidentification.” Accessed January 12 2013. http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand/Eyewitness-Misidentification.php.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, Dean G., Heidi S.Resnick, Kenneth J.Ruggiero, Lauren M.Conoscenti, and JennaMcCauley. 2007. “Drug-Facilitated, Incapacitated, and Forcible Rape: A National Study.” Final report Submitted to the National Institute of Justice, NCJ 219181.
   Google Scholar
• Kohnken, G., and A.Maass. 1988. “Eyewitness Testimony: False Alarms on Biased Instructions?” Journal of Applied Psychology73 (3): 363–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. C. L., G. L.Wells, and F. J.O'Connor. 1989. “Mock-Juror Belief of Accurate and Inaccurate Eyewitnesses: A Replication and Extension.” Law and Human Behavior13 (3): 333–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. C. L., G. L.Wells, and C. M.Rumpel. 1981. “Can People Detect Eyewitness-Identification Accuracy Within and Across Situations.” Journal of Applied Psychology66: 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F.2003. “Our Changeable Memories: Legal and Practical Implications.” Nature Reviews: Neuroscience4 (3): 231–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malpass, R. S., and P. G.Devine. 1981. “Eyewitness Identification: Linup Instructions and the Absence of the Offender.” Journal of Applied Psychology66 (4): 482–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., S.Mastroberardino, and J.Fraser. 2008. “Münsterberg's Legacy: What Does Eyewitness Research Tell us About the Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony?” Applied Cognitive Psychology22: 841–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. J., C.Laney, N. B.Fowler, E. D.Knowles, D.Davis, and E.Loftus. 2010. “Change Blindness Can Cause Mistaken Eyewitness Identification.” Legal and Criminological Psychology16: 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., and R. I.Kemp. 2006. “Comparing Methods of Encountering Postevent Information: The Power of Co-Witness Suggestion.” Applied Cognitive Psychology20 (8): 1083–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry v. New Hampshire. 2012. United States Supreme Court 132 S. Ct. 716–740.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. S., 3rd, S.Garven, and J. M.Wood. 1997. “Co-witness Information Can Have Immediate Effects on Eyewitness Memory Reports.” Law and Human Behavior21 (5): 503–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., and C. F.Chabris. 2011. “What People Believe About How Memory Works: A Representative Survey of the US Population.” PLoS One6 (8): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L.2008. “History of Eyewitness Testimony.” Applied Cognitive Psychology22 (6): 737–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N. M.1997. “Social Influence in Eyewitness Recall: A Meta-analytic Review of Lineup Instruction Effects.” Law and Human Behavior21 (3): 283–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, J., L.Langton, and M.Planty. 2013. Criminal Victimization, 2012. NCJ 243389. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetailandiid=4781.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, K. A., S. L.Green, and R. A.Nash.2010. “Can Fabricated Evidence Induce False Eyewitness Testimony?” Applied Cognitive Psychology24 (7): 899–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnick, D. H., and G. S.Sanders. 1980. “Why do Eyewitnesses Make so Many Mistakes?” Journal of Applied Social Psychology10 (4): 362–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. R., and E. F.Loftus. 2003. “Eyewitness Memory for People and Events.” In Handbook of Psychology, Forensic Psychology, edited by AlanGoldstein, 149–160. Hoboken: New Jersey: John H. Wiley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., and E.Olson. 2003. “Eyewitness Identification.” Annual Review of Psychology54: 277–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., N. K.Steblay, and J. E.Dysart. 2012. “Eyewitness Identification Reforms: Are Suggestiveness-Induced Hits and Guesses True Hits?” Perspectives on Psychological Science7 (3): 264–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., G.Self, and C.Justice. 2000. “Memory Conformity: Exploring Misinformation Effects When Presented by Another Person.” British Journal of Psychology91 (2): 189–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., A.Memon, E. M.Skagerberg, and F.Gabbert.2009. “When Eyewitnesses Talk.” Current Directions in Psychological Science18 (3): 174–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar