Neutralizations and a history of ‘keeping the lid’ on it: how church leaders handled and explained sexual abuse in one diocese

References

• Archdiocese of Milwaukee. 2013a. “ADOM-Project-Benjamin.” https://s3.amazonaws.com/archmil_documents/Misc/ADOM-Project-Benjamin.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Archdiocese of Milwaukee. 2013b. “A historical perspective on clergy sexual abuse of minors in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee.” http://www.archmil.org/reorg/clergy-offenders-info/historical-perspective.htm.
   Google Scholar
• DePalma, A.2002. “Church scandal resurrects old hurts in Louisiana bayou.” The New York Times, March 19. p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, T. P.2006. “Clericalism: Enabler of Clergy Sexual Abuse.” Pastoral Psychology54 (3): 189–213.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, T., A. W. R.Snipe, and P.Wall. 2006. Sex, Priests, and Secret Codes: The Catholic Church's 2000-Year Paper Trail of Sexual Abuse. Los Angeles: Volt Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frawley-O'Dea, M. G.2004. “The History and Consequences of the Sexual-Abuse Crisis in the Catholic Church.” Studies in Gender and Sexuality5 (1): 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, P.2012. “Contrasting Narratives on Responses to Victims and Survivors of Clerical Abuse in England and Wales: Challenges to Catholic Church Discourse.” Child Abuse Review21: 414–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Globe Spotlight Team. 2002. “Church Allowed Abuse by Priests for Years: Aware of Geoghan Record, Archdiocese Still Shuttled Him from Parish to Parish.” The Boston Globe, January 6.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, R.2013. “Unholy Clergy: Amending State Child Abuse Reporting Statutes to Include Clergy Members as Mandatory Reporters in Child Sexual Abuse Cases.” Family Court Review51: 298–315.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P.1996. Pedophiles and Priests: Atomy of a Contemporary Crisis. Bridgewater, NJ: Replica Books.
   Google Scholar
• John Jay College Research Team. 2004. The Nature and Scope of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests and Deacons in the United States 1950–2002. Washington, DC: USCCB.
   Google Scholar
• John Jay College Research Team. 2011. The Causes and Context of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests in the United States, 1950–2010. Washington, DC: USCCB.
   Google Scholar
• Kochansky, G. E., and F.Hermann. 2004. “Shame and Scandal: Clinical and Canon Law Perspectives on the Crisis in the Priesthood.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry27: 299–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipka, M.2013. “Most U.S. Catholics Call Addressing Clergy Sex Abuse a Top Priority.” Retrieved from the Pew Research Center: http://www.pewresearch.org.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., and H.Copes. 2005. “Excuses, Excuses: What have We Learned from Five Decades of Neutralization Research?” In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, edited by M.Tonry, 221–320. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercado, C. C., J. A.Tallon, and K. J.Terry. 2008. “Persistent Sexual Abusers in the Catholic Church: An Examination of Characteristics and Offense Patterns.” Criminal Justice and Behavior35 (5): 629–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minneapolis Star Tribune. 2014. “Poland's Catholic Church Apologizes for Child Sexual Abuse by Priests.” Accessed June 23, 2014. http://www.startribune.com/world/264014221.html#IstdwruRxtkX1fFu.97.
   Google Scholar
• National Review Board for the Protection of Children and Young People. 2004. A Report on the Crisis in the Catholic Church in the United States. Washington, DC: USCCB.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q.2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Perillo, A. D., C. C.Mercado, and K. J.Terry. 2008. “Repeat Offending, Victim Gender, and Extent of Victim Relationship in Catholic Church sexual Abusers: Implications for Risk Assessment.” Criminal Justice and Behavior35 (5): 600–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., N. L.Piquero, K. J.Terry, T.Youstin, and M.Nobles. 2008. “Uncollaring the Criminal: Understanding Criminal Careers of Criminal Clerics.” Criminal Justice and Behavior35 (5): 583–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L., A. F.Rengifo, and B. K.Vollman. 2008. “Trajectories of Abuse and Disclosure: Child Sexual Abuse by Catholic Priests.” Criminal Justice and Behavior35 (5): 570–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spraitz, J. D., and K. N. Bowen. In review. “Techniques of Neutralization and Persistent Sexual Abuse by Clergy: A Content Analysis of Priest Personnel Files from the Archdiocese of Milwaukee.”
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, G. M., and D.Matza. 1957. “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency.” American Sociological Review22 (6): 664–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, K. J.2008. “Stained Glass: The Nature and Scope of Child Sexual Abuse in the Catholic Church.” Criminal Justice and Behavior35 (5): 549–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, K. J., and A.Ackerman. 2008. “Child Sexual Abuse in the Catholic Church: How Situational Crime Prevention Strategies can Help Create Safe Environments.” Criminal Justice and Behavior35 (5): 643–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. 2011. “Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People.” http://www.usccb.org.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, W. P., and R. B.Johnson. 2011. Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences. 4th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vollman, B. K.2011. “Identity and Behavior: Exploring an Understanding of ‘Being’ and ‘Doing’ for Catholic Priests Accused on the Sexual Abuse of Minors in the United States.” PhD diss., City University of New York. http://gradworks.umi.com/34/44/3444521.html.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. D., and K. J.Terry. 2008. “Child Sexual Abuse in the Catholic Church: Revisiting the Rotten Apples Explanation.” Criminal Justice and Behavior35 (5): 658–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar