The paradox of pre-conviction punishment: the experience of living with bail conditions

References

• Alisha, W., D. C. May, and P. B. Wood. 2008. “The Lesser of Two Evils? A Qualitative Study of Offenders’ Preferences for Prison Compared to Alternatives.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 46 (3–4): 71–90. doi:10.1080/10509670802143318.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, F. 1964. The Borderland of Criminal Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, M. 2013. “Desistance by Design: Offenders’ Reflections on Criminal Justice Theory, Policy and Practice.” European Journal of Probation 5 (2): 47–65. doi:10.1177/206622031300500204.
   Google Scholar
• Bolin, R., H. Ouellette, and B. Applegate. 2019. “Managing Compliance: Types of Power in Juvenile and Adult Probation and Parole Supervision.” Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research 4 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/23774657.2018.1505444.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, M. 2007. “Creating the Responsible Prisoner: Federal Admission and Orientation Packs.” Punishment & Society: The International Journal of Penology 9 (1): 67–85. doi:10.1177/1462474507070553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brunson, R., and J. Miller. 2006. “Gender, Race, and Urban Policing: The Experience of African American Youths.” Gender & Society 20 (4): 531–552. doi:10.1177/0891243206287727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Civil Liberties Association. 2014. Set up to Fail: Bail and the Revolving Door of Pre-trial Detention (Canada: The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and Education Trust).
   Google Scholar
• Carson, A., and D. Golinelli. 2014. Prisoners in 2012: Trends in Admissions and Releases, 1991–2012. United States: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. 1985. Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment, and Classification. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Code, “RSC.” 1985, c. C-46
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, B. 1993. “Is Incarceration Really Worse? Analysis of Offenders’ Preferences for Prison over Probation.” Justice Quarterly 10 (1): 67–88. doi:10.1080/07418829300091711.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, H., and E. Gilbert. 2017. “Freedom, so Close but yet so Far: The Impact of the Ongoing Confrontation with Freedom on the Perceived Severity of Punishment.” European Journal of Probation 9 (2): 132–148. doi:10.1177/2066220317710393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnescu, I. 2011. “Pains of Probation: Effective Practice and Human Rights.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 55 (4): 530–545. doi:10.1177/0306624X10369489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley, M. 1992. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbon, W., C. Graebsch, and F. McNeill. 2017. “Pervasive Punishment: Experiencing Supervision.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Visual Criminology, edited by M. Brown and E. Carrabine, 305–319, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gainey, R., and B. Payne. 2000. “Understanding the Experience of House Arrest with Electronic Monitoring: An Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 44 (1): 84–96. doi:10.1177/0306624X00441008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, D. 2001. The Culture of Control in Contemporary Society Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, P. C., R. D. Schroeder, and S. A. Cernkovich. 2007. “Emotions and Crime over the Life Course: A neo-Meadian Perspective on Criminal Continuity and Change.” The American Journal of Sociology 112 (6): 1603–1661. doi:10.1086/512710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowan, T., and S. Whetstone. 2012. “Making the Criminal Addict: Subjectivity and Social Control in a strong-arm Rehab.” Punishment & Society 14 (1): 69–93. doi:10.1177/1462474511424684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grattet, R., and J. Lin. 2016. “Supervision Intensity and Parole Outcomes: A Competing Risks Approach to Criminal and Technical Parole Violations.” Justice Quarterly 33 (4): 565–583. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.932001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, H. 1968. Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. 2015. “The Impact of Supervision on the Pains of Community Penalties in England and Wales: An Exploratory Study.” European Journal of Probation 7 (2): 85–102. doi:10.1177/2066220315593099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. 2018. “Proximity, Pain, and State Punishment.” Punishment & Society 20 (2): 235–254. doi:10.1177/1462474517701303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, B., T. Rugge, G. U. Y. B. Terri-Lynne Scott, K. Y. Annie, and A. K. Yessine. 2008. “Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 47 (3): 248–270. doi:10.1080/10509670802134085.
   Google Scholar
• John Howard Society of Ontario. 2013. Reasonable Bail? https://johnhoward.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/JHSO-Reasonable-Bail-report-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. 1996. “What Do Alternative Sanctions Mean?” The University of Chicago Law Review 63 (2): 591–653. doi:10.2307/1600237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, N. 2015. “Prisoner Incorporation: The Work of the State and non-governmental Organizations.” Theoretical Criminology 19 (4): 534–553. doi:10.1177/1362480614567172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, N., J. Kaiser, and C. Rumpf. 2018. “Beyond Punishment: The Penal State’s Interventionist, Covert, and Negligent Modalities of Control.” Law & Social Inquiry 43 (2): 468–495. doi:10.1111/lsi.12237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingele, C. 2013. “Rethinking the Use of Community Supervision.” The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 103 (4): 1015–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolher-Hausmann, I. 2018. Misdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauzon, J. 2016. “When Bail Courts Don’t Follow the Law.” National Post. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/julie-lauzon-when-bail-courts-dont-follow-the-law
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. 2000. “Rehabilitation as Rhetoric: The Ideal of Reformation in Contemporary Parole Discourse and Practices.” Punishment & Society 2 (1): 40–65. doi:10.1177/14624740022227854.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, G., and H. Mills. 2009. The Community Order and the Suspended Sentence Order Three Years On: The Views and Experiences of Probation Officers and Offenders. London, England: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies). https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/Three_years_on.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Makin, K. 2012. “A Case of Bail Reform.” The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/a-case-for-bail-reform/article4244210/
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, T. 2005. “Probation, Social Context and Desistance: Retracing the Relationship.” Probation Journal 52 (1): 8–22. doi:10.1177/0264550505050623.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F. 2018. “Experiencing Mass Supervision. In McNeill, F. Pervasive Punishment, 105–134. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. J. 2014. “Devolving the Carceral State: Race, Prisoner Reentry, and the micro-politics of Urban Poverty Management.” Punishment & Society 16 (3): 305–335. doi:10.1177/1462474514527487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Attorney General (MAG). 2014. “Successful Bail Program Comes to Kingston”. Ontario Newsroom, February 28. https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/28504/successful-bail-program-comes-to-kingston
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N. 2009. “Shifting Risk: Bail and the Use of Sureties.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 21 (1): 127–147. doi:10.1080/10345329.2009.12035836.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N. 2017. “Eroding the Presumption of Innocence: Pre-trial Detention and the Use of Conditional Release on Bail.” British Journal of Criminology 57 (3): 664–683. doi:10.1093/bjc/azw002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. 2019. ““Jailers in the Community”: Responsibilizing Private Citizens as Third-Party Police.” Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 61 (1): 66–85. doi:10.3138/cjccj.2017-0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natapoff, A. 2017. “The Penal Pyramid.” In The New Criminal Justice Thinking, edited by S. Dolovich and A. Natapoff, 71–99, New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, P. 2008. “Experiments in Risk and Criminal Justice.” Theoretical Criminology 12 (4): 451–469. doi:10.1177/1362480608097152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B., and R. Gainey. 1998. “A Qualitative Assessment of the Pains Experienced on Electronic Monitoring.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 42 (2): 149–163. doi:10.1177/0306624X9804200207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B., and R. Gainey. 2004. “The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders Released from Jail or Prison: Safety, Control, and Comparisons to the Incarceration Experience.” The Prison Journal (Philadelphia, Pa.) 84 (4): 413–435. doi:10.1177/0032885504269345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. 2003. When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. Studies in Crime and Public Policy. Oxford, Eng: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. 2018. “Alternative Sanctions: Diverting Nonviolent Prisoners to Intermediate Sanctions: The Impact on Prison Admissions and Corrections Costs.“ In Rubin, Edward L. Minimizing Harm: A New Crime Policy for Modern America, 115–149. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429498916
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., and S. Turner. 1993. Evaluating Intensive Supervision Probation and Parole: Results of a Nationwide Experiment. United States: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, M. 2013. “The Paradox of Probation: Community Supervision in the Age of Mass Incarceration.” Law & Policy 35 (1–2): 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. v. Antic, 2017 SCC 27, [2017] 1 SCR 509.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. 2004. “.” In The Virtual Prison: Community Custody and the Evolution of Imprisonment(Cambridge Studies in Criminology). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L., and D. Indermaur. 2006. “Timely Intervention or Trapping Minnows? the Potential for a Range of Net-Widening Effects in Australian Drug Diversion Initiatives.” Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law 13 (2): 220–231. doi:10.1375/pplt.13.2.220.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., E. Mulvey, J. Horney, J. Lewis, and M. Arter. 2005. “A Test of Two Methods of Recall for Violent Events.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 21 (2): 175–193. doi:10.1007/s10940-005-2491-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumann, R. 2018. “Sureties as Civilian Jailers: Understanding the Role of the Court in the Lives of Accused Released on Surety Bail in Ontario.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 55 (4): 532–554. doi:10.1111/cars.12221.
   Google Scholar
• Shammas, V. 2014. “The Pains of Freedom: Assessing the Ambiguity of Scandinavian Penal Exceptionalism on Norway’s Prison Island.” Punishment & Society 16 (1): 104–123. doi:10.1177/1462474513504799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinns, L. 2011. Police Custody: Governance, Legitimacy and Reform in the Criminal Justice Process. London: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, L. A., S. Simpson, and D. Smith. 2005. “Strained Lives and Crime: Examining Intra-individual Variation in Strain and Offending in a Sample of Incarcerated Women*.” Criminology 43 (4): 1067–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2005.00033.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprott, J., and A. Manson. 2017. “YCJA Bail Conditions: “Treating” Girls and Boys Differently.” Canadian Criminal Law Review 22 (1): 77.
   Google Scholar
• Sprott, J., and N. Myers. 2011. “Set up to Fail: The Unintended Consequences of Multiple Bail Conditions.” Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 53 (4): 404–423. https://utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/cjccj.53.4.404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, G. 1958. The Society of Captives. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomczak, P., and D. Thompson. 2019. “Inclusionary Control? Theorizing the Effects of Penal Voluntary Organizations’ Work.” Theoretical Criminology 23 (1): 4–24. doi:10.1177/1362480617733724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. 2004. Punishment and Politics. 1st ed. London: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. 2019. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. 2nd ed. ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, S., and K. Hannah-Moffat. 2009. “Under These Conditions: Gender, Parole and the Governance of Reintegration.” The British Journal of Criminology 49 (4): 532–551. doi:10.1093/bjc/azp015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hirsch, A. 1990. “The Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions.” Crime & Delinquency 36 (1): 162–173. doi:10.1177/0011128790036001011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C., A. Doob, and N. Myers. 2009. “The Parable of Ms Baker: Understanding Pre-Trial Detention in Canada.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 21 (1): 79–102. doi:10.1080/10345329.2009.12035834.
   Google Scholar
• Werth, R. 2011. “I Do What I’m Told, Sort Of: Reformed Subjects, Unruly Citizens, and Parole.” Theoretical Criminology 16 (3): 329–346. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1362480611410775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yule, C., P.-P. Paré, and R. Gartner. 2014. “An Examination of the Local Life Circumstances of Female Offenders: Mothering, Illegal Earnings and Drug Use.” The British Journal of Criminology 55 (2): 248–269. doi:10.1093/bjc/azu073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yule, C., and R. Schumann. 2019. “Negotiating Release? Analysing Decision Making in Bail Court.” Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 61 (3): 45–66. https://utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/cjccj.2018-0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar