Reading rights and respecting decisions: an experimental test of consent search warnings

References

• Bar-Gill, O., and B. Friedman. 2012. “Taking Warrants Seriously.” Northwestern University Law Review 106: 1609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrio, A. J. 1997. “Rethinking Schneckloth V. Bustamonte: Incorporating Obedience Theory into the Supreme Court’s Conception of Voluntary Consent.” The University of Illinois Law Review 215–252 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickman, L. 1974. “The Social Power of a Uniform 1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 4 (1): 47–61. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02599.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunson, R. K., and R. Weitzer. 2011. “Negotiating Unwelcome Police Encounters: The Intergenerational Transmission of Conduct Norms.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 40 (4): 425–456. doi:10.1177/0891241611409038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustamonte v Schneckloth, 412 U.S. 218 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Chanenson, S. L. 2004. “Get the Facts, Jack-Empirical Research and the Changing Constitutional Landscape of Consent Searches.” Tennessee Law Review 71: 399.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. 1999. No Equal Justice: Race and Class in the American Criminal Justice System. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dripps, D. 1990. “Beyond the Warrant Court and Its Conservative Critics: Toward a Unified Theory of Constitutional Criminal Procedure.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 23: 591.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., D. Fetchenhauer, and T. Schlösser. 2016. “.” In Advances in Motivation Science 3 1–34 . .
   Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M., and R. K. Brunson. 2012. ““One Question Before You Get Gone … ” Consent Search Requests as a Threat to Perceived Stop Legitimacy.” Race and Justice 2 (4): 250–273. doi:10.1177/2153368712459273.
   Google Scholar
• General Social Survey. (2022). Political Party Affiliation, GSS Data Explorer. Available at https://gssdataexplorer.norc.org/home. Accessed 4 April 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Groenendyk, E. 2016. “The Anxious and Ambivalent Partisan: The Effect of Incidental Anxiety on Partisan Motivated Recall and Ambivalence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (2): 460–479. doi:10.1093/poq/nfv083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, T. K. S., and T. W. Franklin. 2019. “Police Legitimacy in the Context of Street Stops: The Effects of Race, Class, and Procedural Justice.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 30 (3): 406–427. doi:10.1177/0887403417708334.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, L. B., M. E. Oswald, I. Stucki, and M. Gollwitzer. 2010. “A Closer Look at an Eye for an Eye: Laypersons’ Punishment Decisions are Primarily Driven by Retributive Motives.” Social Justice Research 23 (2–3): 99–116. doi:10.1007/s11211-010-0113-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, D. K. 2009. “Free to Leave? An Empirical Look at the Fourth Amendment’s Seizure Standard.” The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 99 1 51–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyllo v. United States. 533 U.S. 27 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, I. 2001. “Miranda in Ohio: The Effects of Robinette on the Voluntary Waiver of Fourth Amendment Rights.” Howard LJ 44: 349.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg, I. D., and A. Smith. 2001. “Testing the Effectiveness of Consent Searches as a Law Enforcement Tool.” Criminal Justice Studies 14 (1): 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, G. E. 2007. “Why Not a Miranda for Searches.” Ohio State Journal Criminal 5: 233.
   Google Scholar
• Maclin, T. 1991. “Black and Blue Encounters-Some Preliminary Thoughts About Fourth Amendment Seizures: Should Race Matter.” Valparaiso University Law Review 26: 243.
   Google Scholar
• Maclin, T. 1993. “When the Cure for the Fourth Amendment is Worse Than the Disease.” Southern California Law Review 68: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, W., and S. Suri. 2012. “Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.” Behavior Research Methods 44 (1): 1–23. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing, S., M. Jabon, and E. Plaut. 2016. “Bias in the Flesh: Skin Complexion and Stereotype Consistency in Political Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (1): 44–65. doi:10.1093/poq/nfv046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. 1974 Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. (New York, NY: Harper & Row) . “.”
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, S., J. Dressler, and G. Thomas. 2018. The Law of Criminal Investigations: A College Casebook. St. Paul, MN: West Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M., T. Meyvis, and N. Davidenko. 2009. “Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (4): 867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K., J. Horowitz, A. Brown, R. C. Fry, and R. D. Igielnik (2018). What Unites and Divides Urban, Suburban and Rural Communities. Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/05/22/demographic-and-economic-trends-in-urban-suburban-and-rural-communities/.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, A. L. 1993. “The Endless Cycle of Abuse. Why 42 U.S.C. 1983 is Ineffective in Deterring Police Brutality.” Hastings Law Journal 44: 753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. 2008. “Effective Warnings Before Consent Searches: Practical, Necessary, and Desirable.” American Criminal Law Review 45: 1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J., and S. Roche. 2016. “Arrested Development: Misguided Directions in Deterrence Theory and Policy.” Criminology & Public Policy. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V., M. Hough, J. Jackson, and M. Gerber. 2012. “Public Opinion Towards the Lay Magistracy and the Sentencing Council Guidelines.” The British Journal of Criminology 52 (6): 1072–1091. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scurich, N., and J. Monahan. 2016. “Evidence-Based Sentencing: Public Openness and Opposition to Using Gender, Age, and Race as Risk Factors for Recidivism.” Law and Human Behavior 40 (1): 36–41. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, R. 2005. “Not Voluntary but Still Reasonable: A New Paradigm for Understanding the Consent Searches Doctrine.” Indiana Law Journal 80: 773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, R., and V. K. Bohns. 2019. “The Voluntariness of Voluntary Consent: Consent Searches and the Psychology of Compliance.” Yale Law Journal 128: 1962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State v. Robinette, 73 Ohio St. 3d 650 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Steiker, C. S. 1999. “” How Much Justice Can You Afford?”–a Response to Stuntz.” The George Washington Law Review 67 (5–6): 1290–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, M. 2001. “Reconstructing Consent.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 92 (1/2): 211. doi:10.2307/1144211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, B. A. 2006. “Whether Consent to Search Was Given Voluntarily: A Statistical Analysis of Factors That Predict the Suppression Rulings of the Federal District Courts.” NYUL Review 81: 2192.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, P. 1986. “The Fourth Amendment in Action: An Empirical View of the Search Warrant Process.” Crime Law Bull 22: 405–421.
   Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., and L. L. Hyers. 1999. “Excuse Me—what Did You Just Say?!: Women’s Public and Private Responses to Sexist Remarks.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1): 68–88. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrill, W., and J. R. Ingram. 2016. “Citizen Complaints Against the Police: An Eight City Examination.” Police Quarterly 19 (2): 150–179. doi:10.1177/1098611115613320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. C.,sIII. 2003. “Terrorism, Race and a New Approach to Consent Searches.” Miss. LJ 73: 525.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United State Census Bureau. (2022). Race and Hispanic Origin. Available at https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US. Accessed 4 April 2022.
   Google Scholar
• United States V. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• van Duizend, R., L. Sutton, and C. Carter. 1984. ”.” The Search Warrant Process: Preconceptions, Perceptions, Practices (Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts) . and Practices.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, S. E., J. Nix, R. Kaminski, and J. Rojek. 2016. “Is the Effect of Procedural Justice on Police Legitimacy Invariant? Testing the Generality of Procedural Justice and Competing Antecedents of Legitimacy.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 32 (2): 253–282. doi:10.1007/s10940-015-9263-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodzicka, J. A., and M. LaFrance. 2001. “Real versus Imagined Gender Harassment.” The Journal of Social Issues 57 (1): 15–30. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, K. M., and C. L. Munsch. 2014. “Fact and Fiction in Constitutional Criminal Procedure.” South Carolina Law Review 66: 445.
   Google Scholar