Pathology Reports: Discrepancy Patterns of Second Opinions in a Referral Cancer Center

References

• Farooq A, Abdelkader A, Javakhishivili N, Moreno GA, Kuderer P, Polley M, et al. Assessing the value of second opinion pathology review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021;33(1):mzab032. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzab032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westra WH, Kronz JD, Eisele DW. The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: a decade experience at a large referral hospital. Head Neck. 2002;24(7):684–693. doi:10.1002/hed.10105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronz JD, Westra WH, Epstein JI. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital. Cancer. 1999;86(11):2426–2435. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991201)86:11<2426::AID-CNCR34>3.0.CO;2-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueck N, Jensen C, Cohen MB, Weydert JA. Mandatory second opinion in cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2009;117(2):82–91. doi:10.1002/cncy.20019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manion E, Cohen MB, Weydert J. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(5):732–737. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e31815a04f5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalifa MA, Dodge J, Covens A, Osborne R, Ackerman I. Slide review in gynecologic oncology ensures completeness of reporting and diagnostic accuracy. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90(2):425–430. doi:10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00323-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazai L, Middleton LP, Goktepe N, Liu BT, Sahin AA. Breast pathology second review identifies clinically significant discrepancies in over 10% of patients. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(2):192–197. doi:10.1002/jso.23788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marco V, Muntal T, García‐Hernandez F, Cortes J, Gonzalez B, Rubio IT. Changes in breast cancer reports after pathology second opinion. Breast J. 2014;20(3):295–301. doi:10.1111/tbj.12252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones K, Jordan RC. Patterns of second-opinion diagnosis in oral and maxillofacial pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(6):865–869. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullin M, Brierley D, Speight P. Second opinion reporting in head and neck pathology: the pattern of referrals and impact on final diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;119(6):656–660. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2014.12.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrad M, Chernock RD, El-Mofty SK, Lewis Jr JS. Diagnostic discrepancies in mandatory slide review of extradepartmental head and neck cases: experience at a large academic center. College Am Patholog. 2015;139(12):1539–1545. doi:10.5858/arpa.2014-0628-OA.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-DE-Oliveira ME, Heerden W, Motta ACF, Rodrigues-Fernandes CI, Romañach MJ, Agostini M, et al. The need for communication between clinicians and pathologists in the context of oral and maxillofacial diseases. Braz Oral Res. 2022;36:8. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0008.
   Google Scholar
• Chafe S, Honore L, Pearcey R, Capstick V. An analysis of the impact of pathology review in gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48(5):1433–1438. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00791-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck M, Moffat D, Latham B, Badrick T. Review of diagnostic error in anatomical pathology and the role and value of second opinions in error prevention. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71(11):995–1000. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton LP, Feeley TW, Albright HW, Walters R, Hamilton SH. Second-opinion pathologic review is a patient safety mechanism that helps reduce error and decrease waste. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(4):275–280. doi:10.1200/JOP.2013.001204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romanoff AM, Cohen A, Schmidt H, Weltz CR, Jaffer SM, Nagi CS, et al. Breast pathology review: Does it make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(11):3504–3508. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3792-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma M, McCluggage WG, Shah V, Berney DM. Pathologists can get it right the first time. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2021. p. 271–272. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206991.
   Google Scholar
• Kim BW. Expert second opinions frequently change histologic diagnoses: an argument in favor of standardizing thyroid cancer pathology reports. Clin Thyroidol. 2020;32(12):574–576. doi:10.1089/ct.2020;32.574-576.
   Google Scholar
• Rakha EA, Pareja FG, editors. New advances in molecular breast cancer pathology. Seminars in cancer biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2021. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.03.014.
   Google Scholar
• Staebler A, Pfisterer J, Diebold J, Lax S, Schmidt D, Kommoss F, et al. Internet based second opinion pathology in a large chemotherapy trial for ovarian cancer–results of a standardized review process. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76(10):P037. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1592680.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ström P, Kartasalo K, Olsson H, Solorzano L, Delahunt B, Berney DM, et al. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):222–232. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30738-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis WD, Dacic S, Wistuba I, Sholl L, Adusumilli P, Bubendorf L, et al. IASLC multidisciplinary recommendations for pathologic assessment of lung cancer resection specimens after neoadjuvant therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15(5):709–740. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagpal K, Foote D, Tan F, Liu Y, Chen P-HC, Steiner DF, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for Gleason grading of prostate cancer from biopsy specimens. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(9):1372–1380. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olayinka O, Kaur G, Agarwal R, Staradub V, Chacho MS, Vidhun R. Impact of multidisciplinary radiologic-pathologic correlation conference for benign image-guided breast biopsies on discordance rates and patient outcomes in a community teaching hospital. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2022;57:151864. doi:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Chen P, McGough M, Xing F, Wang C, Bui M, et al. Pathologist-level interpretable whole-slide cancer diagnosis with deep learning. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1(5):236–245. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0052-1.
   Google Scholar