What is Socioeconomics? An Overview of Theories, Methods, and Themes in the Field

References

• Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agger, B. (2006). Euros to America: The disciplining, deconstruction and diaspora of American social theory. In G.Delantely (Ed.), Handbook of European social theory (pp. 361–371). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ASE (Association for Social Economics). (2013). Retrieved October 13, 2013, from http://www.socialeconomics.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Azar, O. H. (2007). Behavioral economics and socio-economic journals: A citation-based ranking. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 451–462.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (1996). Was ist soziologisch an der Wirtschaftssoziologie? Ungewißheit und die Einbettung wirtschaftlichen Handelns. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 25, 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2007). The great transformation of embeddedness: Karl Polanyi and the new economic sociology. In C.Hann & K.Hart (Eds.), Market and society: The great transformation today (pp. 38–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2009). Wirtschaftssoziologie als Gesellschaftstheorie. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 38, 182–197.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, J., Jackson, M. O., & Bisin, A. (Eds.). (2011). Social economics: A brief introduction to the handbook. Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1A, pp. xviii–xxi). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bögenhold, D. (2010). From heterodoxy to orthodoxy and vice versa: Economics and social sciences in the division of academic work. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69, 1566–1590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögenhold, D. (2011). Sozioökonomik: Das Verhältnis von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft akademisch betrachtet. In G.Mikl-Horke (Ed.), Soziökonomie—die Rückkehr der Wirtschaft in die Gesellschaft (pp. 59–94). Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. (2008). The quest for theoretical foundations of socio-economics: Epistemology, methodology or ontology?Socio-Economic Review, 6, 733–746.
   Google Scholar
• Buono, A., & Savall, H. (Eds.). (2007). Socio-economic interventions in organizations. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Calabresi, G. (1985). Ideals, beliefs, attitudes, and the law: Private law perspectives on a public law problem. New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caspari, V., & Schefold, B. (Eds.). (2011). Wohin steuert die ökonomische Wissenschaft? Ein Methodenstreit in der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Frankfurt/MainCampus.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D. C., Holt, R. P. F., & Rosser, Jr., B. J. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 16, 485–499.
   Google Scholar
• Conbere, J., & Heorhiadi, A. (2011). Socio-economic approach to management. OD Practitioner, 43, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlin, R. (1996). Whose morality? Which community? What interests? Socio-economic and communitarian perspectives. Journal of Socio-Economics, 25, 135–155.
   Google Scholar
• Dallas, L. L. (2003). Law and socio-economics in legal education. University of San Diego School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 50.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. (2008). The turn in recent economics and the return of orthodoxy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, 349–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. (2014). Die Konzeption des sozial eingebetteten Individuums. In R.Hedtke (Ed.), Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? (pp. 209–222). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B., & Dolfsma, W. (Eds.). (2008). Social economics: An introduction and a view of the field. The Elgar Companion to Social Economics (pp. 1–7). Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Deeg, R., & Jackson, G. (2007). The state of the art: Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review, 5, 149–179.
   Google Scholar
• Delantely, G. (Ed.). (2006). Introduction. Handbook of European social theory (pp. XVI–XXV). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delantely, G., & Turner, S. (Eds.). (2011). Introduction. Social, political, and cultural theory since the sixties: The demise of classical Marxism and liberalism, the new reality of the welfare state, and the loss of epistemic innocence. Routledge international handbook of contemporary social and political theory (pp. 1–30). Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deutschmann, C. (2008). Kapitalistische Dynamik. Eine gesellschaftstheoretische Perspektive. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Deutschmann, C. (2009). Soziologie kapitalistischer Dynamik(MPIfG Working Paper 09/5). Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, P., & Vartiainen, H. (Eds.). (2007). Behavioral economics and its applications. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Bone, R. (2014). Sozioökonomie und Économie des conventions. In R.Hedtke (Ed.), Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? (pp. 257–261). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Dore, R. (2010). Financialization of the global economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17, 1097–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlauf, S. N. (2012). Complexity, economics, and public policy. Politics Philosophy Economics, 11, 45–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlauf, S. N., & Young, H. P. (Eds.). (2001). The new social economics. Social dynamics: Economic learning and social evolution (pp. 1–14). London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• EAEPE (European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy). (2013). Retrieved October 16, 2013, from http://eaepe.org/?page = about&side = theoretical_perspectives.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension: Towards a new economics. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (2010). Bounded rationality. Socio-Economic Review, 8, 377–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (2014). Soziökonomik heute. In R.Hedtke (Ed.), Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? (pp. 69–90). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in positive economics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gäfgen, G., & Monisse, H. G. (1978). Zur Einigung soziologischer Paradigmen—Betrachtungen aus der Sicht der Ökonomen. Jahrbuch für Sozialwissenschaft, 29, 181–196.
   Google Scholar
• Giullén, M. F., Collins, R., England, P., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2002). The revival of economic sociology. The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field (pp. 1–32). New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granvogl, H., & Perridon, L. (2000). Sozioökonomie. München/Wien: Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves Heap, S. P. (2008). Individual preferences and decision-making. In J. B.Davis & W.Dolfsma (Eds.), The Elgar companion to social economics (pp. 79–91). Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. L. (1999). Law and socioeconomics. Journal of Legal Education, 49, 224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattwick, R. (1999). The future paradigm for socio-economics: Three visions and a call for papers. Journal of Socio-Economics, 28, 511–532.
   Google Scholar
• Hedtke, R. (Ed.). (2014). Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? In Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? (pp. 15–65). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, R., & Müller, K. H. (2008). Transforming socio-economics with a new epistemology. Socio-Economic Review, 6, 395–426.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R. P. F., Rosser, J. B., & Colander, D. C. (2011). The complexity era in economics. Review of Political Economy, 23, 357–369.
   Google Scholar
• Kreitner, R. (2002). Management. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. N. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I., & Zahar, E. G. (1976). Why did Copernicus's programme supersede ptolemy's? In R.Westman (Ed.), The Copernican achievement. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, O., & Steinmo, S. (2012). How institutions evolve: Evolutionary theory and institutional change. Polity, 44(May), 314–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, V., Samuels, S., & Ross, L. (2004). The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1175–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, M. P. (2011). A psychological explanation for economic cycles. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 352–659.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdemann, J. (2007). Die Grenzen des homo oeconomicus und die Rechtswissenschaft. In C.Engel, M.Englerth, J.Lüdemann, I.Spiecker (Eds.), Recht und Verhalten (pp. 8–59). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Lueger, M., & Froschauer, U. (2011). Grenzen und Bedingungen organisationaler Steuerung. In G.Mikl-Horke (Ed.), Sozioökonomie: Die Rückkehr der Wirtschaft in die Gesellschaft (pp. 239–269). Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, M. A. (2006). Emphasizing the social: Social economics and socio-economics. Review of Social Econimics, 48, 303–320.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, M. A. (2009). Social economics. In J.Peil & I.van Staveren (Eds.), Handbook of economics and ethics (pp. 516–522). Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, A. (2008). Institutions, culture and values. In J. B.Davis & W.Dolfsma (Eds.), The Elgar companion to social economics (pp. 28–43). Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffery, E. J. & Slemrod, J. (Eds.). (2006). Behavioral public finance. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mikl-Horke, G. (Ed.). (2011). Was ist Sozioökonomie? Von der Sozialökonomie der Klassiker zur Sozioökonomie der Gegenwart. Sozioökonomie: Die Rückkehr der Wirtschaft in die Gesellschaft (pp. 19–58). Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Mikl-Horke, G. (2014). Traditionen, Problemstellungen und Konstitutionsprobleme der Sozioökonomie. In R.Hedtke (Ed.), Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? (pp. 91–119). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network. American Sociological Review, 69, 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, K.-H. (2014). Drei methodische Pfade für die Sozioökonomie im 21. Jahrhundert. In R.Hedtke (Ed.), Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? (pp. 181–208). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Oris, M., & Burgnard, S. (2014). Der Studiengang in Sozioökonomie der Universität Genf. In: R.Hedtke (Ed.), Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? (pp. 367–386). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Piore, M. (2003). Society as a precondition for individuality: Critical comments. Socio-Economic Review, 1, 119–122.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2003). Management. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schettgen, P. (2007). The contribution of social psychology to designing HR performance management systems. In A.Bergknapp, C.Gärtner, & S.Lederle (Eds.), Sozioökonomische Organisationsforschung (pp. 24–45). Mering: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• SASE (Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics). (2013). Retrieved October 15, 2013, from https://sase.org/about-sase/about-sase_fr_41.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H. (2008). The temporalities of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 6, 517–537.
   Google Scholar
• Sklar, M. J. (1988). The corporate reconstruction of American capitalism, 1890–1916: The market, the law, and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. (1993). The socio-economic perspective and its institutional prospects. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 22, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. (2001). History of scientific disciplines. In N. J.Smelser & P. B.Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 13727–13731). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. (2009). Re-forming capitalism: Institutional change in the German political economy. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. (2010). Does ‘behavioural economics’ offer an alternative to the neoclassical paradigm?Socio-Economic Review, 8, 387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, R. (2003). Mind the gap: Law, institutional analysis and socioeconomics. Socio-Economic Review, 1, 335–367.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (1994). Markets as social structures. In N. J.Smelser & R.Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 255–282). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verstegen, B. H. J. (2011). A socio-economic view on management control. International Journal of Social Economics, 38, 114–127.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. (2007). Business systems and organizational capabilities: The institutional structuring of competitive competences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. S., & Gowdy, J. M. (2013). Evolution as a general theoretical framework for economics and public policy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, S3–S10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeder, J. (2012). Cass Sunstein on New Directions in Regulatory Policy. Retrieved July 15, 2014. http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/spotlight/public-service/sunstein-on-new-directions-in-regulatory-policy.html.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, V. A. (2012). How I became a relational economic sociologist and what does that mean?Politics & Society, 40, 145–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar