The Normative Problem of Merit Goods in Perspective

References

• Amadae, S. M. (2003). Rationalizing capitalist democracy. The cold war origins of rational choice liberalism. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andel, N. (1984). Zum Konzept Der Meritorischen Güter [On the concept of merit goods]. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 42, 630–648.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, D. A. L., & Bing, P. C. (1971). Merit wants: A further analysis. Finanzarchiv, 30, 257–265.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. E., & Nishizawa, T. (2010a). Welfare economics, old and new. In R. E. Backhouse, & T. Nishizawa (Eds.) No wealth but life (pp. 223–236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750649
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. E., & Nishizawa, T. (Eds.). (2010b). No wealth but life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baigent, N. (1981). Social choice and merit goods. Economics Letters, 7, 301–305.10.1016/0165-1765(81)90033-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballentine, J. G. (1972). Merit goods, information, and corrected preferences. Finanzarchiv, 31, 298–306.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, K. (1976). Retrospective choice and merit goods. Finanzarchiv, 35, 220–225.
   Google Scholar
• Baujard, A. (2015a). An history of welfare economics. Mimeo. GATE L-SE working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Baujard, A. (2015b). Economic science vs. welfare economics. An epistemological reading of the history of welfare economics. Mimeo. GATE L-SE working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, A. (1938). A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52, 310–334.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, T. (1988). A simple model for merit good arguments. Journal of Public Economics, 35, 371–383.10.1016/0047-2727(88)90038-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braulke, M. (1972/2007). Merit goods: A few additional comments. In W. Ver Eecke (Ed.), An anthology regarding merit goods: The unfinished ethical revolution in economic theory (pp. 221–223). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1983). Institutional aspects of ‘merit goods’ analysis. Finanzarchiv, 41, 183–206.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Walsh, C. (Eds.). (1990). Rationality, individualism, and public policy. Canberra: Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, The Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1960). The theory of public finance. Southern Economic Journal, 26, 234–238.10.2307/1054956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, P. (1977/2007). Efficient’ pricing and government interference. In W. Ver Eecke (Eds.), An anthology regarding merit goods: The unfinished ethical revolution in economic theory (pp. 281–294). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. (1936). Toward a concept of social value. In M. Abramovitz & E. Ginzberg (Eds.) Preface to social economics. Essays on economic theory and social problems (pp. 44–65). New York, NY: Farrar & Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Clément, V., Moureau, N., & Vidal, M. (2009). À la recherche des biens sous tutelle [Searching for merit goods]. L’Actualité économique, Revue d’analyse économique, 85, 383–401.
   Google Scholar
• Colm, G. (1960a). In defense of the public interest. Social Research, 27, 295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colm, G. (1960b). The theory of public finance: A study in public economy. The Journal of Finance, 15, 118–120.10.2307/2976491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colm, G. (1965). National goals analysis and marginal utility economics. Finanzarchiv, 24, 209–224.
   Google Scholar
• Cooter, R. D., & Gordley, J. (1995). The cultural justification of unearned income: An economic model of merit goods based on Aristotelian ideas of Akrasia and distributive justice. In R. Cowan & M. J. Rizzo (Eds.), Profits and morality (pp. 150–174). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooter, R. D., & Rappoport, P. (1984). Were the ordinalists wrong about welfare economics? Journal of Economic Literature, 22, 507–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culyer, A. J. (1971). Merit goods and the welfare economics of coercion. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 26, 546–572.
   Google Scholar
• D’amico, D. (2009). Merit goods, paternalism and responsibility. Pavia: Mimeo, University of Pavia.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (2005). What do economists analyze and why: Values or facts? Economics and Philosophy, 21, 221–278.10.1017/S026626710500057X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. (1990). Cooter and rappoport on the normative. Economics and Philosophy, 6, 139–146.10.1017/S0266267100000687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. (2006). The turn in economics: Neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism? Journal of Institutional Economics, 2, 1–20.10.1017/S1744137405000263
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. (2008). The turn in recent economics and return of orthodoxy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, 349–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Viti de Marco, A. (1934/1936). First principles of public finance. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais-Tremblay, M. (2014). Normative and positive theories of public finance: Contrasting Musgrave and Buchanan. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21, 273–289.10.1080/1350178X.2014.939690
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais-Tremblay, M. (2015b). Musgrave, Samuelson, and the crystallization of the standard rationale for public goods. Mimeo. Based on a previous working paper from 2013 titled On the definition of Public Goods. Assessing Richard A. Musgrave’s contribution. CES Working Papers, 2014.04.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais-Tremblay, M. (in press). A genealogy of the concept of merit wants. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desreumaux, V. (2013). Équilibre général et justice sociale: la théorie néoclassique comme philosophie politique? [General equilibrium and social justice: Neoclassical theory as a political philosophy?] Cahiers d Économie Politique, 1, 75–110.10.3917/cep.064.0075
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. (2009). What is welfare and how can we measure it? In H. Kinkaid & D. Ross (Eds.), The oxford handbook of philosophy of economics (pp. 511–539). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ege, R., & Igersheim, H. (2010). Rawls's justice theory and its relations to the concept of merit goods. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17, 1001–1030.10.1080/09672567.2010.482999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, P., Klein, J. L., Daston, L., Lemov, R., Sturm, T., & Gordin, M. D. (2013). How reason almost lost its mind. The strange career of cold war rationality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226046778.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fiorito, R., & Kollintzas, T. (2004). Public goods, merit goods, and the relation between private and government consumption. European Economic Review, 48, 1367–1398.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkers, C. (1974/2007). Merit goods: A problem in the normative theory of public spending. In W. Ver Eecke (Ed.), An anthology regarding merit goods: The unfinished ethical revolution in economic theory (pp. 253–280). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. G. (1971). Freedom of the Will and the concept of a Person. The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 5–20.10.2307/2024717
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in positive economics (pp. 3–43). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. K. (1958). The affluent society. Cambridge, MA: The Riverside Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg, R., & Rubinstein, A. (2005). Economic socio-dynamic. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C. (1955). Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 63, 309–321.10.1086/257678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawi, R. (2011). La Théorie de la justice de John Rawls à l’aune de l’économie: une reconstruction [The theory of justice of John Rawls in the light of economy: a reconstruction] ( PhD thesis). Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Head, J. G. (1966). On merit goods. Finanzarchiv, 25, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Head, J. G. (1969). Merit goods revisited. Finanzarchiv, 28, 214–225.
   Google Scholar
• Head, J. G. (1988). On merit wants: Reflections on the evolution, normative status and policy relevance of a controversial public finance concept. Finanzarchiv, 46, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Head, J. G. (1991). Merit wants: Analysis and taxonomy. In L. Eden (Ed.), Retrospectives on public finance (pp. 229–252). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, J. G. (2009). Introduction and dedication. In J. G. Head & R. Krever (Eds.), Tax reform in the 21st century. A volume in memory of Richard Musgrave (pp. xi–xiii). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. (1821/1991). Elements of the philosophy of right. ( H. B. Nisbet, Trans. and A. W. Wood, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochman, H. M., & Rodgers, J. D. (1969). Pareto optimal redistribution. The American Economic Review, 59, 542–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutt, W. H. (1934). Economic method and the concept of competition. The South African Journal of Economics, 2, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hutt, W. H. (1936). Economists and the public. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Hutt, W. H. (1940). The concept of consumers’ sovereignty. The Economic Journal, 50, 66–77.10.2307/2225739
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, L. (1965). Public economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchgässner, G. (2015). Soft paternalism, merit goods, and normative individualism. European Journal of Law and Economics, [online first].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackscheidt, K. (1974/2007). Merit goods: Musgrave’s idea and its consequences. In W. Ver Eecke (Ed.), An anthology regarding merit goods: The unfinished ethical revolution in economic theory (pp. 244–252). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, S. (2006). Merit goods in a utilitarian framework. Review of Political Economy, 18, 509–520.10.1080/09538250600915691
   Google Scholar
• Mann, S., & Gairing, M. (2012). Does libertarian paternalism reconcile merit goods theory with mainstream economics? Forum for Social Economics, 41, 206–219.10.1007/s12143-010-9084-3
   Google Scholar
• Mastromatteo, G., & Solari, S. (2014). The idea of ‘common good’ and the role of the state in present day social economics. Rivista Internazionale Di Scienze Sociali, 124, 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzola, U. (1890/1958). The formation of the prices of public goods. In R. A. Musgrave & A. T. Peacock (Eds.), Classics in the theory of public finance (pp. 37–47). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McLure Jr, C. E. (1968). Merit wants: A normatively empty box. Finanzarchiv, 27, 474–483.
   Google Scholar
• McLure Jr, C. E. (1990). Merit wants. In G. Brennan & C. Walsh (Eds.), Rationality, individualism, and public policy (pp. 178–185). Canberra: Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Mongin, P. (2006). A concept of progress for normative economics. Economics and Philosophy, 22, 19–54.10.1017/S0266267105000696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, A. (2009). Bounded rationality and public policy: A perspective from behavioural economics. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1023/b99496
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1937). The theory of public finance and the concept of “burden of taxation” (PhD dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1957). A multiple theory of budget determination. Finanzarchiv, 17, 333–343.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public economy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1969a). Provision for social goods. In J. Margolis & H. Guitton (Eds.), Public economics: An analysis of public production and consumption and their relations to the private sectors (pp. 124–144). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1969b). Cost-benefit analysis and the theory of public finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 7, 797–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1970). Pareto optimal redistribution: comment. The American Economic Review, 60, 991–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1983). Public finance, now and then. Finanzarchiv, 41, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1987). Merit goods. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new palgrave dictionary of economics ( 1st ed., pp. 1958–1960). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1997). Crossing traditions. In H. Hagemann (Ed.), Zur deutschsprachigen wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Emigration nach 1933 (pp. 63–79). Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1999). Fiscal federalism. In J. M. Buchanan & R. A. Musgrave (Eds.), Public finance and public choice: Two contrasting visions of the state (pp. 155–175). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/CESifo.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, P. B. (2008). Comments on two Musgravian concepts. Journal of Economics and Finance, 32, 340–347.10.1007/s12197-008-9046-2
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841286
   Google Scholar
• Pauly, M. V. (1970). Efficiency in the provision of consumption subsidies. Kyklos, 23, 33–57.10.1111/kykl.1970.23.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazner, E. A. (1972). Merit wants and the theory of taxation. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 27, 460–472.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. (1932). The economics of welfare (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pulsipher, A. G. (1971). The properties and relevancy of merit goods. Finanzarchiv, 30, 266–286.
   Google Scholar
• Racionero, M. (2000). Optimal redistribution with unobservable preferences for an observable merit good. International Tax and Public Finance, 7, 479–501.10.1023/A:1008733405651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1982). Social unity and primary goods. In A. Sen & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond (pp. 158–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness. A restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritschl, H. (1931). Communal economy and market economy. In R. A. Musgrave & A. T. Peacock (Eds.), Classics in the theory of public finance (pp. 233–242). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. (1932). An essay on the nature & significance of economic science. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roskamp, K. W. (1975). Public goods, merit goods, private goods, pareto optimum, and social optimum. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 30, 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Rüffer, C. (2007). Merit goods determined by society value judgments – Political implications for public participation. Support from an empirical analysis concerning environmental goods. Stuttgart: Ibidem.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.10.2307/1925895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy’s discontent. America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandmo, A. (1983). Ex post welfare economics and the theory of merit goods. Economica, 50, 19–33.10.2307/2554118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1979). Personal utilities and public judgements: Or what's wrong with welfare economics. The Economic Journal, 89, 537–558.10.2307/2231867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturn, R. (2015). The merits of merit wants. In C. Binder, G. Codognato, M. Teschl, & Y. Xu (Eds.), Individual and collective choice and social welfare: Essays in honor of Nick Baigent (pp. 289–308). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1159.10.2307/1600573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1982). The diversity of goods. In A. Sen & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond (pp. 129–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611964
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1990). Irreducibly social goods. In G. Brennan & C. Walsh (Eds.), Rationality, individualism, and public policy (pp. 45–63). Canberra: Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93, 175–179.10.1257/000282803321947001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M., & Houston, D. B. (1962). Metropolitan finance reconsidered: Budget functions and multi-level governments. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 44, 412–417.10.2307/1926658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. (1970). On limiting the domain of inequality. The Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 263–277.10.1086/466693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ver Eecke, W. (1998). The concept of a “merit good” the ethical dimension in economic theory and the history of economic thought or the transformation of economics into socio-economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 27, 133–153.10.1016/S1053-5357(99)80081-X
   Google Scholar
• Ver Eecke, W. (1999). Public goods: An ideal concept. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 28, 139–156.10.1016/S1053-5357(99)00004-9
   Google Scholar
• Ver Eecke, W. (2003). Adam Smith and Musgrave’s concept of merit good. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 31, 701–720.10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00144-0
   Google Scholar
• Ver Eecke, W. (Ed.). (2007). An anthology regarding merit goods: The unfinished ethical revolution in economic theory. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ver Eecke, W. (2008). Ethical dimensions of the economy: Making use of Hegel and the concepts of public and merit goods. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-540-77111-1
   Google Scholar
• Ver Eecke, W. (2013). Ethical reflections on the financial crisis 2007/2008: Making use of Smith, Musgrave and Rajan. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-35091-7
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (1987). Individual irrationality and public policy. In search of merit/demerit policies. Journal of Public Policy, 7, 103–134.10.1017/S0143814X00005201
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J. (1960). The public economy. Economica, 27, 258–270.10.2307/2601678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar