225
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Children’s Snacks, their Ads and Consumer Sovereignty

, , &

References

  • Ackerberg, D. A. (2001). Empirically distinguishing informative and prestige effects of advertising. The RAND Journal of Economics, 32, 316–333.10.2307/2696412
  • Baumol, W. (1962). The Doctrine of consumer sovereignty—Discussion. American Economic Review, 52, 289.
  • Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1993). A simple theory of advertising as a good or bad. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 941–964.10.2307/2118455
  • Blaug, M. (1993). Pieter Hennipman on Paretian welfare economics: A comment. De Economist, 141, 127–129.10.1007/BF01144781
  • Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1983). Institutional aspects of merit good analysis. Finanzarchiv, 41, 183–206.
  • Calfee, J. E. (1997). Fear of persuasion: A new perspective on advertising and regulation. La Vergne: Agora.
  • Chou, S.-Y., Grossman, M., & Saffer, H. (2004). An economic analysis of adult obesity: Results from the behavioural risk factor surveillance system. Journal of Health Economics, 23, 565–587.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.003
  • Coestier, B., Gozlan, E., & Marette, S. (2005). On food companies liability for obesity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 1–14.10.1111/j.0002-9092.2005.00697.x
  • Comanor, W. S., & Wilson, T. A. (1974). Advertising and market power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Cowen, T. (1993). The scope and limits of preference sovereignty. Economics and Philosophy, 9, 253–269.10.1017/S0266267100001553
  • Cutler, D. M., Glaeser, E. L., & Shapiro, J. M. (2003). Why have Americans become more obese? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 93–118.10.1257/089533003769204371
  • D’Amico, D. (2009). Merit goods, paternalism and responsibility. Retrieved August 29, 2013, from http://www-3.unipv.it/websiep/2009/200928.pdf
  • Dias, M. L. A. L. (2010). Publicidade e Direito [Advertising and Law] (1st ed.). São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais.
  • Dilnot, A., & Helm, D. (1987). Energy policy, merit goods and social security. Fiscal Studies, 8, 29–48.10.1111/fisc.1987.8.issue-3
  • Eika, K. H. (2009). The challenge of obtaining quality care: Limited consumer sovereignty in human services. Feminist Economics, 15, 113–137.10.1080/13545700802446658
  • Elster, J. (1984). Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Farr, S. J., Tremblay, C. H., & Tremblay, V. J. (2001). The welfare effect of advertising restrictions in the U.S. Cigarette Industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 18, 147–160.10.1023/A:1007801608741
  • Ferraz, L. (2009) Demora do judiciário e o custo Brasil [The costs of a delayed law system in Brazil]. Revista Eletrônica sobre a Reforma do Estado, 18.
  • George, D. (2001). Polluting preferences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2012). Old wine in new casks: Libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles. Social Choice and Welfare, 38, 635–645.10.1007/s00355-011-0636-0
  • Grupo de Mídia. (2012). Mídia Dados Brasil [Media Data Brazil]. Rio de Janeiro: Mimeo.
  • Hoffman, S., Krupnik, A., & Adamowicz, W. (2005). Economic uncertainties in valuing reductions in children’s environmental health risks. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  • Instituto Palavra Aberta. (2011). Efeitos Econômicos de Restriçoes e Impostas a Informação Publicitária [Economic effects of restrictions and duties on public information]. Sao Paulo: Mimeo.
  • Kaldor, N. V. (1949/1950). The economic aspects of advertising. Review of Economic Studies, 18, 427–450.
  • Lakdawalla, D., & Philipson, T. (2002). The growth of obesity and technological change: A theoretical and empirical examination ( NBER Working Paper No. 8946). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Linn, S. (2006). Crianças do Consumo: A infancia roubada [Children of consumption: A stolen childhood]. Sao Paulo: Instituto Alana.
  • Mann, S. (2006). Merit goods in a utilitarian framework. Review of Political Economy, 18, 509–520.10.1080/09538250600915691
  • Mann, S. (2008). Framing obesity in economic theory and policy. Review of Social Economy, 66, 163–179.10.1080/00346760701668461
  • Mann, S., & Gairing, M. (2012). Does libertarian paternalism reconcile merit goods theory with mainstream economics? Forum for Social Economics, 41, 206–219.10.1007/s12143-010-9084-3
  • Mann, S., & Wüstemann, H. (2010). Public governance of information asymmetries—The gap between reality and economic theory. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 278–285.10.1016/j.socec.2009.10.009
  • Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick, E. V. Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 55–71). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • McLure, C. E. (1968). Merit wants: A normatively empty box. Finanzarchiv, 27, 474–483.
  • Moraes, R. (1999). Análise de conteúdo [Content Analysis]. Revista Educação, 22, 7–32.
  • Mundle, S., & Rao, M. G. (1991). Volume and composition of government subsidies in India, 1987–1988. Economic and Political Weekly, 26, 1171–1172.
  • Munro, L. (1999). A principal-agent analysis of the family: Implications for the welfare state ( IDPM Discussion Paper Series No. 58). Manchester, NH: Institute for Development policy and Management.
  • Musgrave, R. A. (1957). A multiple theory of budget determination. Finanzarchiv, 17, 341–360.
  • Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York, NY: McGrawHill.
  • Philipson, T. (2001). The world-wide growth in obesity: An economic research agenda. Health Economics, 10, 1–7.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1050
  • Philipson, T., & Posner, R. (1999). The long-run growth of obesity as a function of technological change ( John M. Olin Program in Law & Economics Working Paper No. 78). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Law School.
  • Rabelo, J. H. G. (2003). O Processo Civil e o Acesso a Justiça [The civil process and access to justice]. Revista CEJ, 7, 8–12.
  • Rotfeld, H. J., Abernethy, A. M., & Parsons, P. R. (1990). Self-regulation and television advertising. Journal of Advertising, 19, 18–26.10.1080/00913367.1990.10673197
  • Schutz, R. (2005). O Publicitário Legal: Alguns Toques, sem juriquês, sobre o Direito da Publicidade no Brasil [Legal advertisements: Some remarks on the right in advertising]. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark.
  • Telser, L. G. (1962). Advertising and cigarettes. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 471–499.10.1086/258699
  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93, 175–179.10.1257/000282803321947001
  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge—Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Chicago, IL: Yale University Press.
  • Ver Eecke, W. (1998). The concept of a ‘merit good’ the ethical dimension in economic theory and the history of economic thought or the transformation of economics into socio-economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 27, 133–153.10.1016/S1053-5357(99)80081-X
  • Ver Eecke, W. (2003). Adam Smith and Musgrave’s concept of merit good. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 31, 701–720.10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00144-0
  • Werneck, B. (2004). A auto-regulação da atividade econômica no Brasil [On the auto-regulation of economic activities in Brazil]. In M. Di Pietro (Ed.), Regulatório: Temas Polêmicos. Sao Paulo: Saraiva.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.