Modeling Radical Uncertainty and Anticipating Uncertain Change with Models

References

• Akerlof, G. (2002). Behavioral macroeconomics and macroeconomic behavior. American Economic Review , 92 , 411–433.10.1257/00028280260136192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G. (2007). The missing motivation in macroeconomics. American Economic Review , 97 , 5–36.10.1257/aer.97.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (2015). Complexity and the economy . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and cooperation . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (2006). Agent-based modeling as a bridge between disciplines. In L. Tesfatsion & K. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, Vol. 2: Agent-based computational economics (pp. 1565–1584). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Bedau, M. (2003). Downward causation and autonomy in weak emergence. Principia , 6 , 5–50.
   Google Scholar
• Beinhocker, E. (2007). The origin of wealth: Evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics . London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Binswanger, M. (2015). Geld aus dem Nichts [Money out of nothing]. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Borrill, P. , & Tesfatsion, L. (2011). Agent-based modeling: The right mathematics for the social sciences? In J. B. Davis & D. W. Handes (Eds.), Elgar companion to recent economic methodology (pp. 228–258). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D. (2000). The complexity vision and the teaching of economics . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D. , Holt, R. P. F. , & Barkley Rosser, J. (2011). The complexity era in economics. Review of Political Economy , 23 , 357–369.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D. , & Kupers, R. (2014). Complexity and the art of public policy . Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400850136
   Google Scholar
• Darley, V. (1994). Emergent phenomena and complexity. In R. A. Brooks & P. Maes (Eds.), Artificial life IV. proceedings of the fourth international workshop on the synthesis and simulation of living systems (pp. 411–416). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. (1982). Rational expectations: A fallacious foundation for studying crucial decision-making processes. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics , 5 , 182–198.10.1080/01603477.1982.11489355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deguet, J. , Demazeau, Y. , & Magnin, L. (2006). Elements about the emergence issue: A survey of emergence definitions. Complexus , 3 , 24–31.10.1159/000094185
   Google Scholar
• Derbyshire, J. (in press). Potential surprise theory as a theoretical foundation for scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change . doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsner, W. , Heinrich, T. , & Schwardt, H. (2014). The microeconomics of complex economies – Evolutionary, institutional, neoclassical, and complexity perspectives . Oxford: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. M. (1999). Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity , 4 , 41–60.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0526
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. M. (2006). Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. D. , & Foley, D. (2009). The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature , 460 , 685–686.10.1038/460685a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, M. (2008). The complexity approach to economics: a paradigm shift ( CESMEP Working Paper). Torino: Università di Torino.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. , Loewenstein, G. , & O’donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature , XL , 351–401.10.1257/jel.40.2.351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Essays in positive economics (pp. 3–34). Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frigg, R. , & Reiss, J. (2009). The philosophy of simulation: Hot new issues or same old stew? Synthese , 169 , 593–613.10.1007/s11229-008-9438-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gräbner, C. (2016). Agent-based computational models – A formal heuristic for institutionalist pattern modelling? Journal of Institutional Economics , 12 , 241–261.10.1017/S1744137415000193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gräbner, C. , & Kapeller, J. (2015). New perspectives on institutionalist pattern modeling: Systemism, complexity, and agent-based modeling. Journal of Economic Issues , 49 , 433–440.10.1080/00213624.2015.1042765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamill, L. , & Gilbert, N. (2016). Agent-based modelling in economics . Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity , 19 , 1–8.10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z
   Google Scholar
• Keen, S. (1995). Finance and economic breakdown: Modeling Minsky’s “Financial Instability Hypothesis”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics , 17 , 607–635.10.1080/01603477.1995.11490053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, T. , & Kurozumi, T. (2007). Optimal monetary policy in a micro-founded model with parameter uncertainty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control , 31 , 399–431.10.1016/j.jedc.2005.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirman, A. (2011). Complex economics – Individual and collective rationality . New York, NY : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit . Boston, MA : Schaffner & Marx.
   Google Scholar
• Kyläheiko, K. (1998). Making sense of technology. Towards a synthesis between neoclassical and evolutionary approaches. International Journal of Production Economics , 56–57 , 319–332.10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00036-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. (2006). Do heterodox theories have anything in common? A post-Keynesian point of view. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention , 3 , 87–112.10.4337/ejeep
   Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, A. , & Kuorikoski, J. (2007). Computing the perfect model – why do economists shun simulation? Philosophy of Science , 74 , 304–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempert, R. , Popper, S. , & Bankes, S. (2002). Confronting surprise. Social Science Computer Review , 20 , 420–440.10.1177/089443902237320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , 20 , 130–141.10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. H. , & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onatski, A. , & Williams, N. (2003). Modeling model uncertainty. Journal of the European Economic Association , 1 , 1087–1122.10.1162/jeea.2003.1.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palley, T. I. (1993). Uncertainty, expectations, and the future: If we don’t know the answers, what are the questions? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics , 16 , 3–18.10.1080/01603477.1993.11489965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, R. , Mukherjee, M. , Vezzoli, S. , & Kramer, A. M. (2015). Scenarios as a scholarly methodology to produce “interesting research”. Futures , 71 , 70–87.10.1016/j.futures.2015.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronald, E. M. A. , Sipper, M. , & Capcarrère, M. S. (1999). Design, observation, surprise! A test of emergence. Artificial Life , 5 , 225–239.10.1162/106454699568755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, M. W. M. (2015). The macroeconomics of radical uncertainty ( Ruhr Economic Papers No. 592). Essen: RWI.
   Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. (1955). Uncertainty in economics and other reflections . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soderstrom, U. (2002). Monetary policy with uncertain parameters. Scandinavian Journal of Economics , 104 , 125–145.10.1111/sjoe.2002.104.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2000). Credible worlds: The status of theoretical models in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology , 7 (1), 1–31.10.1080/135017800362220
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2009). Credible worlds, capacities and mechanisms. Erkenntnis , 70 , 3–27.10.1007/s10670-008-9134-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfatsion, L. (2002). Economic agents and markets as emergent phenomena. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 99 (Suppl. 3), 7191–7192.10.1073/pnas.072079199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velupillai, K. V. (2005). Computability, complexity and constructivity in economic analysis . New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, D. (2012). Economic growth ( international edition). Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, U. (2009). Propositions about novelty. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 70 , 311–320.10.1016/j.jebo.2009.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar