Too Much Redistribution, Too Little or Just Right?

References

• Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2011). Preferences for redistribution. Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1, pp. 93–131). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., Stantcheva, S., & Teso, E. (2018). Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution. American Economic Review, 108(2), 521–554. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20162015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2017). World inequality report. Creative Commons Licence 4.0 - cc by-nc-sa 4.0 World Inequality Lab, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. (2015). Inequality. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, E., & Moene, K. (2016). The equality multiplier: How wage compression and welfare empowerment interact. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(5), 1011–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabou, R., & Ok, E. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The POUM hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 447–487. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boushey, H., DeLong, J.B., and Steinbaum, M. (Eds.). (2017). After Piketty. The agenda for economics and inequality. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A cooperative species. Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, E., Ross, S., & Washington, E. (2011). Economics and policy preferences: Causal evidence of the impact of economic conditions on support for redistribution and other ballot proposals. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 888–906. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 817–869. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302760193904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, A. W., Hole, A. D., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2007). The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. American Economic Review, 97(3), 818–827. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.3.818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D. (2018). The future of capitalism: Facing the new anxieties. Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Corneo, G., & Grüner, H. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00172-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruces, G., Perez Truglia, R., & Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimick, M., Rueda, D., & Stegmueller, D. (2018). Models of other-regarding preferences, inequality, and redistribution. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-091515-030034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durante, R., Putterman, L., & van der Weele, J. (2014). Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: An experimental study. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(4), 1059–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Albertos, J., & Kuo, A. (2018). Income perception, information, and progressive taxation: Evidence from a survey experiment. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, C. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00141-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabay, A. S., Radua, J., Kempton, M. J., & Mehta, M. A. (2014). The Ultimatum Game and the brain: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 549–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimpelson, V., & Treisman, D. (2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics, 30(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, P., & Spilimbergo, A. (2014). Growing up in a recession. The Review of Economic Studies, 81(2), 787–817. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haushofer, J., & Fehr, E. (2014). On the psychology of poverty. Science, 344(6186), 862–867. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadja, M., Mollerstrom, J., & Seim, D. (2017). Richer (and holier) than thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keister, L. A. (2005). Getting rich: America’s new rich and how they got that way. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiatpongsan, S., & Norton, M. I. (2014). How much (more) should CEOs make? A universal desire for more equal pay. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 9(6), 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614549773
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt, S., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissowska, M. (2015). Is poverty and inequality actually good for growth? Forum for Social Economics, 44(2), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2014.951377
   Google Scholar
• Moene, K. (2013). Scandinavian equality: A prime example of protection without protectionism. In J. Stiglitz & M. Kaldor (Eds.), The quest for security: Protection without protectionism and the challenge of global governance (p. 48–74). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a better America-one wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate of Elections. (2018). Parliamentary elections. https://valgresultat.no/?type=st&year=2017
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). Key indicators on income distribution and poverty. http://www.oecd.org/social/income-distribution-database.
   Google Scholar
• Page, L., & Goldstein, D. G. (2016). Subjective beliefs about the income distribution and preferences for redistribution. Social Choice and Welfare, 47(1), 25–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-015-0945-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, K. (2017). The broken ladder: How inequality changes the way we think, live and die. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda, D., & Stegmueller, D. (2019). Who wants what? Redistribution preferences in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildberg-Hörisch, H. (2010). Is the veil of ignorance only a concept about risk? An experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11–12), 1062–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seguino, S. (2021). Inequality and economic stratification: Reflections on Bromley, Piketty, and obeng-odoom. Forum for Social Economics, 50(2), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2020.1864433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2018). Statistikkbanken. https://www.ssb.no/statbank/
   Google Scholar
• Tricomi, E., Rangel, A., Camerer, C. F., & O’Doherty, J. P. P (2010). Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences. Nature, 463(7284), 1089–1091. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2018). The inner level: How more equal societies reduce stress, restore sanity and improve everyone’s well-being. Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2021). World development indicator. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
   Google Scholar