Resistance and the Development of Scientific Practice: Designing the Mangle Into Science Instruction

REFERENCES

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Modeling science classrooms after scientific laboratories: Recommendations for research and implementation. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry (pp. 80–85). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, L.K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68–94. doi: 10.1002/tea.20446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L.K., & McNeill, K.L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793. doi: 10.1002/sce.20402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L.K., & Reiser, B.J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L.K., & Reiser, B.J. (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216. doi: 10.1002/sce.20420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70(5), 1098–1120. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C.A., Buckland, L.A., & Samarapungavan, A.L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241–1257. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660301007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A.A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, T., Kelly, G.J., & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 237–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A.A. , & Wagner, J. (2005). What coordination has to say about transfer. In J.P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 121–154). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R.A. (2011). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts, and developments. In D. Dai (Ed.), Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing growth and functioning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R.A., & Conant, F.R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R.A., Conant, F.R., & Greeno, J.G. (2007). Progressive refinement of hypotheses in video-supported research. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S.J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 239–254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M.J. (2005). The game, the pieces, and the players: Generative resources from two instructional portrayals of experimentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 449–487. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1404_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M.J. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404–423. doi: 10.1002/sce.20263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E.M., & Alonzo, A.C. (2010). The role of content in inquiry-based elementary science lessons: An analysis of teacher beliefs and enactment. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 425–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B.E., & Hall, R. (2007). Modeling without end: Conflict across organizational and disciplinary boundaries in habitat conservation planning. In J. Kaput, E. Hamilton, S. Zawojewski, & R. Lesh (Eds.), Foundations for the future (pp. 57–76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, D. (1990). Experiment and the making of meaning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M., Martin, T., Hand, V., & Greeno, J. (2009). Constructing competence: An analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 49–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotzer, T. (2003). Learning to understand the forms of causality implicit in scientifically accepted explanations. Studies in Science Education, 39(1), 1–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Greeno, J.G. (2008). Learning and understanding concepts in practice. In T. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R., & Redish, E. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J.P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89–120). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., & Corey, C. (2001). Viewing classrooms as cultural contexts for fostering scientific literacy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 214–243. doi: 10.1525/aeq.2001.32.2.214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2003). The use of argumentation in Haitian creole science classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (2012). Concepts in practice as sources of order. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 314–323. doi: 10.1080/10749039.2012.694006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P., Rodriguez, A.B., & Duschl, R.A. (2000). Doing the lesson or doing science: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G.J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2008). What needs to develop in the development of inquiry skills? Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 512–559. doi: 10.1080/07370000802391745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated cognition: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R. (2009). Designing to develop disciplinary dispositions: Modeling natural systems. American Psychologist, 64(8), 759–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 635. doi: 10.3102/00028312041003635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23(4), 512–529. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louca, L.T., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96(6), 1071–1105. doi: 10.1002/sce.21030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E. (2014). Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review of Educational Research, 1–38 doi: (advance online publication). doi: 10.3102/0034654314558490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, K.E. (2011). Disentangling robust developmental constraints crom the instructionally mutable: Young children's epistemic reasoning about a study of their own design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(1), 50–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy of the Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N.J. (2012). Engineering concepts: The interplay between concept formation and modeling practices in bioengineering sciences. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 222–239. doi: 10.1080/10749039.2012.688232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B.J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.
   Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Conant, F. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61–94.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 127–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, R.S., Coffey, J.E., Hammer, D., & Hutchison, P. (2009). Making classroom assessment more accountable to scientific reasoning: A case for attending to mechanistic thinking. Science Education, 93(5), 875–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W.A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488–526. doi: 10.1002/sce.21006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643–670. doi: 10.1002/sce.21069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W.A. (2004). Developing learning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 213223.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W.A. (2014). Science education's need for a theory of epistemological development. Science Education, 98(3), 383–387. doi: 10.1002/sce.21107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W.A., & Reiser, B.J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X. (2010). From interaction to interaction: Exploring shared resources constructed through and mediating classroom science learning. ( Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, . 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Tatar, D. (2007). The design tensions framework. Human–Computer Interaction, 22(4), 413–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J.F. (2006). Transfer in pieces. Cognition and Instruction, 24(1), 1–71. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of” inquiry”: How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar