Effects of Comparing Contrasting Cases on Learning From Subsequent Explanations

REFERENCES

• Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J., Aldrich, N.J., & Tenenbaum, H.R. (2011). Does discovery-based learning enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 1–18. doi: doi:10.1037/a0021017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfieri, L., Nokes-Malach, T.J., & Schunn, C.D. (2013). Learning through case comparisons: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 48, 87–113. doi: doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.775712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D.P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272. doi: doi:10.1037/h0046669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brünken, R., Seufert, T., & Paas, F. (2010). Measuring cognitive load. In J.L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken, (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 181–202). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologist, 41, 1123–1130. doi: doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K.J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147–1156. doi: doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M.T. H., & Slotta, J.D. (1993). The ontological coherence of intuitive physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 249–260. doi: doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1002&3_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I.S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15–35). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikzentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822. doi: doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G. M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31, 105–113. doi: doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M.M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69, 145–186. doi: doi:10.3102/00346543069002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 158–172. doi: doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysink, T.H. S., De Jong, T., Berthold, K., Kolloffel, B., Opfermann, M., & Wouters, P. (2009). Learner performance in multimedia learning arrangements: An analysis across instructional approaches. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1107–1149. doi: doi:10.3102/0002831209340235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furr, R.M., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Evaluating theories efficiently: The nuts and bolts of contrast analysis. Understanding Statistics, 2, 45–67. doi: doi:10.1207/S15328031US0201_03
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393–408. doi: doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glogger, I., Holzäpfel, L., Kappich, J., Schwonke, R., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2013). Development and evaluation of a computer-based learning environment for teachers: Assessment of learning strategies in learning journals. Education Research International. doi: doi:10.1155/2013/785065
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R.G. M., & VanLehn, K. (2010). The effect of self-explaining on robust learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33, 302–332. doi: doi:10.3233/JAI-2010-010
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B., & Schraw, G. (2010). Conceptions of efficiency: Applications in learning and problem solving. Educational Psychologist, 45, 1–14. doi: doi:10.1080/00461520903213618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, N.G., Day, J., Park, A.H. K., Bonn, D.A., & Roll, I. (2014). Making the failure more productive: Scaffolding the invention process to improve inquiry behaviors and outcomes in invention activities. Instructional Science, 42, 523–538. doi: doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9300-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. (2010). Schema acquisition and sources of cognitive load. In J.L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 48–64). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 1–19. doi: doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424. doi: doi:10.1080/07370000802212669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40, 651–672. doi: doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9209-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi: doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K.R., & Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 239–264. doi: doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9049-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, K.J., Miao, C., & Gentner, D. (2001). Learning by analogical bootstrapping. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 417–446. doi: doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1004new_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G. (2001). Instructional explanations: A commonplace for teaching and location for contrast. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 333–357). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Steele, M.D. (2005). Seeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 87–163. doi: doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2301_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2012). Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarizing as learning strategies. Learning and Instruction, 22, 16–26. doi: doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van Gog, T., Van der Vleuten, C.P. M., & Van Merriënboer, J.J. G. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32–42. doi: doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2014). Knowing what you don't know makes failure productive. Learning and Instruction, 34, 74–85. doi: doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyens, S.M. M., & Gijbels, D. (2008). Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: Introducing a multi-directional approach. Instructional Science, 36, 351–357. doi: doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarajan, A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2006). Scaffolding learning from contrasting video cases. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 439–445). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D.S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19, 228–242. doi: doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi: doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkl, A. (2009). Why constructivists should not talk about constructivist learning environments—A commentary on Loyens and Gijbels (2008). Instructional Science, 37, 495–498. doi: doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9098-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkl, A. (2014). Toward an instructionally oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38, 1–37. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkl, A. (2015). Different roads lead to Rome: The case of principle-based cognitive skills. Learning: Research and Practice, 1, 79–90. doi: doi:10.1080/23735082.2015.994255
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R.K. (2007). Interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. An introduction to the special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 235–238. doi: doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9052-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J.R. (2009). Compared with what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 529–544. doi: doi:10.1037/a0014224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelle, J., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2014). Two instructional aids to optimise processing and learning from instructional explanations. Instructional Science, 42, 207–228. doi: doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9277-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelle, J., Lehmkuhl, N., Beyer, M.-U., & Berthold, K. (2015). The role of specificity, targeted learning activities, and prior knowledge for the effects of relevance instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 705723. doi: doi:10.1037/edu0000010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelle, J., Müller, C., Roelle, D., & Berthold, K. (2015). Learning from instructional explanations: Effects of prompts based on the active-constructive-interactive framework. Plos One, 10 (4): e0124115. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (2008). Essentials of behavioural research: Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R.L., & Rubin, D.B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research. A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H.G., De Volder, M.L., De Grave, W.S., Moust, J.H. C., & Patel, V.L. (1989). Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 610–619. doi: doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R.A., & Bjork, R.A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–217. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (2010). Reanalyzing the expertise reversal effect. Instructional Science, 38, 315–323. doi: doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9104-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., Fries, S., & Horz, H. (2009). Motivational aspects of cognitive load theory. In M. Wosnitza, S. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 69–96). Göttingen, Germany & New York, NY: Hogrefe & Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D.L., & Bransford, J.D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475–522. doi: doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1604_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D.L., Chase, C.C., Oppezzo, M.A., & Chin, D.B. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 759–775. doi: doi:10.1037/a0025140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D.L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 129–184. doi: doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2202_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D.L., Sears, D., & Chang, J. (2007). Reconsidering prior knowledge. In M.C. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 319–344). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Slamecka, N.J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604. doi: doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaak, J., & De Jong, T. (2001). Learner vs. system control in using online support for simulation-based discovery learning. Learning Environments Research, 4, 217–241. doi: doi:10.1023/A:1014434804876
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J.L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29–47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J.G., & Paas, F.G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. doi: doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Es, E.A., & Sherin, M.G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571–596.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604. doi: doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2008). Why instructional explanations often do not work: A framework for understanding the effectiveness of instructional explanations. Educational Psychologist, 43, 49–64. doi: doi:10.1080/00461520701756420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2010). How effective are instructional explanations in example-based learning? A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 393–409. doi: doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9136-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar