Beginning Teachers' Use of Resources to Enact and Learn from Ambitious Instruction

References

• Abell, S. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2010). In search of well-started beginning science teachers: Insights from two first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 661–686.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2011). Building a common core for learning to teach, and connecting professional learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17–21, 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D., Sleep, L., Boerst, T., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, W. (1999). Domains of teacher knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 133–144). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, W. (1991). Effect of new biology teachers' subject-matter knowledge on curricular planning. Science Education, 75, 631–647.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (2000, April). The importance of a situated view of learning to the design of research and instruction. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45–82). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (2011, April). Discussant remarks. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Zhao, Q., & Dean, C. (2009). Conducting design experiments to support teachers' learning: A reflection from the field. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 165–199.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249–305.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. (2002). Resources, instruction, and research. In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 80–119). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (2005) Introduction. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: Science in the classroom (pp. 1–26). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Science Education, 32, 268–291.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2010). How can Vygotsky and his legacy help us understand and develop teacher education? In V. Ellis, A. Edwards, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Cultural-historical perspectives on teacher education and development (pp. 63–77). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ensor, P. (2001). From preservice mathematics teacher education to beginning teaching: A study in recontextualizing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 296–320.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., He, Y., Levin, B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 161–171.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A. (2006). Being a novice teacher in two different settings: Struggles, continuities, and discontinuities. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2021–2052.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, M., Carpenter, T., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers' generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653–689.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsburg, J. (2012). Why new mathematics teachers do or don't use practices emphasized in their credential program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(5), 359–379.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers' knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51–94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, G., & Lederman, N. G. (1995). Biology teachers' perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 301–325.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009a). Teaching practice: A cross-professional study. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009b). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 27–-289.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Valencia, S., Evans, K., Thompson, C., Martin, S., & Place, N. (2000). Transitions into teaching: Learning to teach writing in teacher education and beyond. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(4), 631–662.
   Google Scholar
• Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430–511.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers' conversations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225–259.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers' ability to enact ambitious instruction. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australiasia (Vol. 1, pp. 11–21). Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., & Hintz, A. (2014). Intentional talk: How to structure and lead productive mathematical discussions. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (1987). Inexact sciences: Professional education and the development of expertise. Review of Research in Education, 14, 133–167.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (1999) The role of preservice teacher education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 54–86). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591–598.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., Boerst, T. A., & Graziani, F. (2011). Organizational resources in the service of school-wide ambitious teaching practice. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1361–1400.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., & Graziani, F. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers' and teacher educators' learning. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491–509.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., Franke, M., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A.C., Beasley, H., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching in elementary mathematics. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 226–243.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers' views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O. (1995). Subject matter knowledge, classroom management, and instructional practices in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 423–440.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (Eds.). (2001). Investigating real data in the classroom: Expanding children's understanding of math and science. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D. M., Grant, T., & Hammer, D. (2012). Attending and responding to student thinking in science. The American Biology Teacher, 74(3), 158–162.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J., & Roehrig, G. (2007). Capturing science teachers' epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38–63.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Maskiewicz, A. C., & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429–464.
   Google Scholar
• May, D. B., Hammer, D., & Roy, P. (2006). Children's analogical reasoning in a 3rd-grade science discussion. Science Education, 90(2), 316–330.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the "at rest" condition of an object. The Physics Teacher, 20, 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Committee on science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.), Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework of New K–12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P., & van Driel, J. H. (2010). Teaching together and learning together—Primary science student teachers' and their mentors' joint teaching and learning in the primary classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1309–1318.
   Google Scholar
• Nolen, S. B., Ward, C. J., Horn, I. S., Childers, S., Campbell, S., & Mahna, K. (2009). Motivation in pre-service teachers: The development of utility filters. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 265–278). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2003). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peressini, D., Borko, H., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., & Willis, C. (2004). A conceptual framework for learning to teach secondary mathematics: A situative perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 67–96.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rex, L.A., & Nelson M. (2004). How teachers' professional identities position high-stakes test preparation in their classrooms. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1288–1331.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2008). Optimizing learning: Implications of learning sciences research. In Learning in the 21st century: Research, innovation, and policy (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31–56). New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities—In search of an analytical tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34, 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, G., Bird, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). Teacher education: Its problems and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464–476.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., Hagenah, S., Lohwasser, K., & Laxton, K. (2015). Problems without ceilings: How mentors and novices frame and work on problems-of-practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 363–381.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615.
   Google Scholar
• van Driel, J. H., de Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86(4), 572–590.
   Google Scholar
• van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244–276.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. (1995). Equity in the future tense: Redefining relationships among teachers, students, and science in linguistic minority classrooms. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 289–328). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. (2005). The art of fieldwork. Lanham MD: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99.
   Google Scholar