Design, Participation, and Social Change: What Design in Grassroots Spaces Can Teach Learning Scientists

References

• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. ( 2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. ( 2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Medin, D., Washinawatok, K., & Chapman, S. ( 2010). Innovations in culturally-based science education through partnerships and community. In M. Khine & I. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 569–592). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. ( 2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S. ( 2014). Design-based research: a methodological toolkit for engineering change. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 151–170). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blume, H. ( 2013, September 25). LAUSD halts home use of iPads for students after devices hacked. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com
   Google Scholar
• Booker, A., Vossoughi, S., & Hooper, P. ( 2014). Tensions and possibilities for political work in the learning sciences. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O'Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, … L. D'Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014, Volume 2 (pp. 919–926). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. ( 2008). Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. ( 2007). Sustaining model systems of educational activity: Designing for the long haul. In J. Campione, K. Metz, & A. S. Palincsar (Eds.), Children's learning in laboratory and classroom contexts (pp. 71–87). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., Clement, A., & Pipek, V. ( 2013). Communities: Participatory design for, with and by communities. In J. Simonsen & T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of participatory design (pp. 182–210). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, B., & DiSalvo, C. ( 2014). Designing for democracy in education: Participatory design and the learning sciences. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O'Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, … L. D'Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014, Volume 2 (pp. 793–799). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. ( 2009). From learning environments and implementation to activity systems and expansive learning. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. ( 2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. ( 2010). Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings, and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fals-Borda, O. ( 1970). Ciencia propia y colonialism intelectual. Mexico, D.F., Mexico: Editorial Nuestro Tiempo.
   Google Scholar
• Fals-Borda, O. ( 2006). The north-south convergence: A 30 year first person assessment of PAR. Action Research, 4(3), 351–-358.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierréz, K., & Vossoughi, S. ( 2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 100–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. ( 2013). Conceptualizing cultural and racialized process in learning. Human Development, 55(5–6), 348–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, E. ( 2011). Playbook for progressives: 16 qualities of the successful organizer. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. ( 2014). Who's asking? Native science, western science, and science education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, T. P., & Carroll, J. M. ( 1996). Overview of design rationale. In T. P. Moran & J. M. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use (pp. 1–20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., Roseberry, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. ( 2014). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 686–706). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. ( 2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R. ( 2014). Emerging forms of formative intervention research in education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 97–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. ( 2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svihla, V. ( 2014). Advances in design-based research. Frontline learning Research, 2(4), 35–45.
   Google Scholar