Assessment of Historical Analysis and Argumentation (AHAA): A New Measure of Document-Based Historical Thinking

References

• Beck, R. B., Black, L., Krieger, L. S., Naylor, P. C., & Shabaka, D. I. (2012). World history: Patterns of interaction. Orlando, FL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Breakstone, J. (2014). Try, try, try again: The process of designing new history assessments. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 453–485. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.965860
   Google Scholar
• Breakstone, J., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2013). Beyond the bubble in history/social studies assessments. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(5), 53–57. doi:10.1177/003172171309400512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge International Exams. (2017). June 2015 Mark Scheme. Retrieved from http://www.cie.org.uk/programmes-and-qualifications/cambridge-igcse-history-0470/past-papers/
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E. H. (1961). What is history? New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• College Board. (2017). The AP United States History Exam. Retrieved from http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/members/exam/exam_informaton/2089.html
   Google Scholar
• Collingwood, R. G. (1946). The idea of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Beyond basic skills: The role of performance assessment in achieving 21st century standards of learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Swire, B., & Chang, D. (2011). Correcting false information in memory: Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 570–578. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. G., & Esler, A. (2005). World history: Connections to today. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ercikan, K., & Seixas, P. (2011). Assessment of higher order thinking: The case of historical thinking. In G. Schraw (Ed.), Assessment of higher order thinking skills (pp. 245–261). Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ercikan, K., & Seixas, P. (2015). Issues in designing assessments of historical thinking. Theory into Practice, 54(3), 255–262. doi:10.1080/00405841.2015.1044375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R. J. (1999). In defense of history. New York, NY: Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. W. (2004). The social studies wars: What should we teach the children? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fass, P. (2003). Cultural history/social history: Some reflections on a continuing dialogue. Journal of Social History, 37(1), 39–46. doi:10.1353/jsh.2003.0137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddis, J. L. (2002). The landscape of history: How historians map the past. London, UK: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2005). Construct‐irrelevant variance in high‐stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23(1), 17–27. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2004.tb00149.x
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, U., & Hasselhorn, M. (2008). Historical perspective taking: A standardized measure for an aspect of students' historical thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 264–270. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hexter, J. H. (1971). The history primer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1420–1436. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3(2), 87–108. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0302_1
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S. (1983). The genesis of shorter document-based questions in the advanced placement American history examination. American Historical Association Perspectives (May/June): 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Körber, A. (2011). German history didactics: From historical consciousness to historical competencies—and beyond? In H. Bjerg, C. Lenz, & E. Thorstensen (Eds.), Historicizing the uses of the past: Scandinavian perspectives on history culture, historical consciousness and didactics of history related to World War II (pp. 145–164). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. doi:10.1093/hcr/30.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2014). Fused horizons? UK Research into students' second-order ideas in history: A perspective from London. In M. Köster, H. Thünemann, & M. Zülsdorf-Kersting (Eds.), Researching history education: International perspectives and disciplinary traditions (pp. 170–194). Bamberg, Germany: Wochenschau Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. J. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. In J. D. Bransford & M. S. Donovan (Eds.), How students learn: History, math and science in the classroom (pp. 29–78). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. J., & Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7-14. In P. Seixas, P. Stearns, & S. Wineburg(Eds.), Teaching, learning and knowing history (pp. 199–222). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., & Shemilt, D. (2003). A scaffold, not a cage: Progression and progression models in history. Teaching History, 113, 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Young, K. M. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 441–486. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1404_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque, S. (2008). Thinking historically: Educating students in the 21st century. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Limón, M. (2002). Conceptual change in history. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.) Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 259–289). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, J. (2016). Vindiciae Gallicae and other writings on the French Revolution. D. Winch (Ed.). Carmel, IN: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of Mink, L. (1987). Historical understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23. doi:10.3102/0013189X023002013
   Google Scholar
• Mink, L. (1987). Historical understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monte-Sano, C., & De La Paz, S. (2012). Using writing tasks to elicit adolescents’ historical reasoning. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(3), 273–299. doi:10.1177/1086296X12450445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (1795). A view of the causes and progress of the French Revolution, Vol. II. London, UK: G.G. and J. Robinson.
   Google Scholar
• Munslow, A. (1997). Deconstructing history (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Dept. of Education. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Education and the Economy. (2016). Setting College-Ready Qualification Scores for the Fall 2015 Mississippi and Spring 2016 Arizona World History Examinations. Washington, DC: NCEE.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. In J. Pelligrino, N. Chudowsky, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novick, P. (1988). That noble dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American historical profession. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J., Baxter, G. P., & Glaser, R. (1999). Addressing the ‘two disciplines’ problem: Linking theories of cognition and learning with assessment and instructional practice. Review of Research in Education, 24, 307–353. doi:10.2307/1167273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. Van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rabaut, J.-P. (1792). The history of the revolution of France. (trans). London, UK: J. Debrett.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, G. A. (2009). Testing historical knowledge: Standards, multiple-choice questions and student reasoning. Theory and Research in Social Education, 37(3), 298–316.
   Google Scholar
• Réimpression de l’Ancien Moniteur, suele histoire authentique et inaltérée de la Révolution française, despuis la rénuion des États-Généraux jusqu’au Consulat. (1847). Vol 2, p. 544 in P. Dwyer & P. McPhee (Eds.) (2002). In The French Revolution and Napoleon: A Sourcebook (pp. 29–30). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2015). The difficulty of assessing disciplinary historical reading. In E. Kadriye & S. Peter (Eds.), New directions in assessing historical thinking. New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsen, J. (1993). Studies in metahistory. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., & Zakai, S. (2016). A rigorous dialectic: Writing and thinking in history. Teachers College Record, 118(1), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Robinson, D. R. (Eds.). (2011). Assessment of higher order thinking skills. Current perspectives on cognition, learning, and instruction (pp. 1–15). Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P., Gibson, L., & Ercikan, K. (2015). A design process for assessing historical thinking: The case of a one-hour test. In E. Kadriye & S. Peter (Eds.), New directions in assessing historical thinking (Ch. 7). New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six: Historical thinking concepts. Toronto, Canada: Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. D. (2017). Cognitive validity: Can multiple choice items tap historical thinking processes. American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1256–1287. doi:10.3102/0002831217717949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielvogel, J. J. (2010). World history. Columbus, OH: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning abut the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansledright, B. (2014). Assessing historical thinking and understanding: Innovative designs for new standards. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (2009). Postmodernism and historiography. Ritsumeikan University. Retrieved from http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/gr/gsce/news/200901022_repo_0-e.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., & Voss, J. (1999). Constructing Arguments from Multiple Sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301–311. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.91.2.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991a). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495–519. doi:10.3102/00028312028003495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991b). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1994). The cognitive representation of historical texts. In G. Leinhardt, I. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 85–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 319–346. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (2004). Crazy for history. Journal of American History, 90(4), 1401–1414. doi:10.2307/3660360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., & Martin, D. (2009). Tampering with history: Adapting primary sources for struggling readers. Social Education, 73(5), 212–216.
   Google Scholar