Family Culture as Context for Learning through Inquiry

References

• Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P., Tzou, C., Bricker, L., & Baines, A. D. (2012). Learning in diversities of structures of social practice: Accounting for how, why and where people learn science. Human Development, 55(5–6), 269–284. doi:10.1159/000345315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. doi:10.2307/2088165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Vye, N., Stevens, R., Kuhl, P., Schwartz, D., Bell, P., … Roschelle, J. (2005). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 209–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, G. S. (2000). The scientific discourse of education: Predetermining the lives of others—Foucault, education, and children. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(1), 36–44. doi:10.2304/ciec.2000.1.1.6
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (2017). Idioculture design as a tool of cultural psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5). pp. 772–781.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333–356). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1922/2002). Human Nature and Conduct. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1981). The philosophy of John Dewey (Vol. 1 and 2). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreier, O. (2009). Persons in structures of social practice. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 193–212. doi:10.1177/0959354309103539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., Conant, F. R., & Greeno, J. G. (2007). Progressive refinement of hypotheses in video-supported research. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the Learning Sciences (pp. 239–254). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1997). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. Mind, Culture, and Activity: Seminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 22, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A. (1979). Small groups and culture creation: The idioculture of little league baseball teams. American Sociological Review, 44(5), 733. doi:10.2307/2094525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970/2017). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method (W. Glen-Dopel, Trans.). London: Sheed and Ward.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25(1–2), 1–30. doi:10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S., & McDermott, R. (2007). Staying the course with video analysis. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the Learning Sciences (pp. 101–114). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (2007). Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 93–110. doi:10.1177/0957926507069459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X032005019
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Stevens, R. (2015). Interaction analysis approaches to knowledge in use. In A.A. diSessa, M. Levin, & J.S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences(pp. 72–108). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2003). The use of argumentation in Haitian Creole science classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 73–93. doi:10.17763/haer.73.1.hnq801u57400l877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219–248). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Pragmatics and beyond New Series, 125, 13–34.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. [Database] doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keifert, D. T., & Marin, A. M. (2018). A commentary on Charles Goodwin’s Co-Operative Action for learning scientists. Cognition and Instruction, 36(3), 171–187.
   Google Scholar
• Keifert, D., & Stevens, R. (2019). Inquiry as a members’ phenomenon: Young children as competent inquirers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 240–278. doi:10.1080/10508406.2018.1528448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keifert, D. (2015). Young children participating in inquiry: Moments of joint inquiry and questioning practices at home and in school (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (3724286)
   Google Scholar
• Keifert, D. (2017, June). Two kinds of thought experiments about water temperature during young children’s family and technology-enhanced play. Paper presented at the annual Jean Piaget Society Conference. San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, E., Cho, Y. H., Caleon, I., & Wei, Y. (2014). Where are we now? Research trends in the learning sciences. Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674–689. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394. doi:10.3102/0091732X09358129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. (2003). Why we need to re-think race and ethnicity in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 3–5. doi:10.3102/0013189X032005003
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S., Keifert, D., Marin, A., & Enyedy, N. (2020). Hybrid argumentation in literature and science for K-12 classrooms. In N. S. Nasir, C. D. Lee, R. Pee, & M. McKinney de Royston (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 141–159). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2011). Commentary: On understanding understanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 553–555. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, A. M. (2020). Ambulatory sequences: Ecologies of learning by attending and observing on the move. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3) 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, A. M. (2013). Learning to attend and observe: Parent-child meaning making in the natural world (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (3605744)
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. P. (1976). Kids make sense: An ethnographic account of the interactional management of success and failure in one first-grade classroom (Order No. 7718265). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (302810647).
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., McKinney de Royston, M., Barron, B., Bell, P., Pea, R., Stevens, R., & Goldman, S. (2020). Learning pathways: How learning is culturally organized. In N. S. Nasir, C. D. Lee, R. Pee, & M. McKinney de Royston (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 195–211). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N.S., Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Lee, C. (2006). Learning as cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Shieffelin (Eds.), Developmental psychology (pp. 43–72). New York, NY: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Taylor, C., Rudolph, D., & Smith, R. (1992). Storytelling as a theory‐building activity. Discourse Processes, 15(1), 37–72. doi:10.1080/01638539209544801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., Bang, M., & Jackson, K. (2018). Articulating the “how,” the “for what,” the “for whom,” and the “with whom” in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 83–88. doi:10.1080/07370008.2018.1413530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (pp. 64–91). London, England: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., Dahl, A., & Callanan, M. (2018). The importance of understanding children’s lived experience. Developmental Review, 50, 5–15. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2018.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In D. Hymes & J. Gumperz (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 346–380). New York, NY: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). In another context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (No. 11) (pp. 191–228). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8(2), 165–187. doi:10.1177/0957926597008002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, B., Bang, M., & Krakowski, M. (2004). Micropractices and the four meanings of “epistemology.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomi-Gröhn, T. (2003). Developmental transfer as a goal of internship in practical nursing. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 199–231). New York, NY: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., & Gutiérrez, K. (2014). Studying movement, hybridity, and change: Toward a multi-sited sensibility for research on learning across contexts and borders. National Society for the Study of Education, 113(2), 603–632.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt‐Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense‐making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552. doi:10.1002/tea.1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Ogonowski, M., & Pothier, S. (2005). Rethinking dichotomies in modes of thinking in science learning. In Everyday matters in science and mathematics: Studies of complex classroom events. Mahwah, NJ:  Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Weinsheimer, J. (1985). Gadamer’s Hermeneutics a reading of truth and method. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar