Integrating Viewpoint and Space: How Lamination across Gesture, Body Movement, Language, and Material Resources Shapes Learning

References

• Abrahamson, D., Lee, R. G., Negrete, A. G., & Gutiérrez, J. F. (2014). Coordinating visualizations of polysemous action: Values added for grounding proportion. ZDM, 46(1), 79–93. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0521-7
   Google Scholar
• Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J., Wolfgram, M. S., Church, R. B., Jacobs, S. A., Johnson Martinez, C., & Knuth, E. J. (2014). How teachers link ideas in mathematics instruction using speech and gesture: A corpus analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 32(1), 65–100. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.858161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. B., Turner, T. J., & Bower, G. H. (1979). Point of view in narrative comprehension, memory, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(2), 187–198. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90118-X
   Google Scholar
• Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 269–309. doi:10.1080/07370000802177177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2016). Co-thought and co-speech gestures are generated by the same action generation process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(2), 257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colella, V. (2000). Participatory simulations: Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 471–500. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S. W., Friedman, H. S., Duggan, K. A., Cui, J., & Popescu, V. (2017). Hand gesture and mathematics learning: Lessons from an Avatar. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 518–535. doi:10.1111/cogs.12344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S. W., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2009). Embodied communication: Speakers’ gestures affect listeners’ actions. Cognition, 113(1), 98–104. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, E. M. (1996). Gestures at work in sense-making science talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 173–208. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0503_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish, J., Saleh, A., Andrade, A., & Bryan, B. (2017). Observing complex systems thinking in the zone of proximal development. Instructional Science, 45(1), 5–24. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9391-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish, J. A. (2014). Applying an activity theory lens to designing instruction for learning about the structure, behavior, and function of a honeybee system. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 100–148. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.856793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish, J. A., Enyedy, N., Saleh, A., & Humburg, M. (2020). Learning in embodied activity framework: A sociocultural framework for embodied cognition. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 49–87. doi:10.1007/s11412-020-09317-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger, E. (2010). Deixis, gesture, and cognition in spatial frame of reference typology. Studies in Language, 34(1), 167–185. doi:10.1075/sl.34.1.16dan
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (Eds.). (2012). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., Tu, X., Georgen, C., Danish, J. A., & Enyedy, N. (2019). The impact of different play activity designs on students’ embodied learning. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(9/10), 611–639. doi:10.1108/ILS-08-2019-0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLiema, D., Enyedy, N., & Danish, J. A. (2019). Roles, rules, and keys: How different play configurations shape collaborative science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 513–555. doi:10.1080/10508406.2019.1675071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLiema, D., Lee, V., Danish, J., Enyedy, N., & Brown, N. (2015). A microlatitudinal/microlongitudinal analysis of speech, gesture, and representation use in a student’s repeated scientific explanations of phase change. In A. A. diSessa, M. Levin, & N. J. S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences (pp. 133–159). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeLiema, D., & Steen, F. F. (2014). Thinking with the body: Conceptual integration through gesture in multiviewpoint model construction. In M. Borkent, B. Dancygier, Hinnell, J. (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 275–294). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• DeLiema, D., & Sweetser, E. (2016). Rethinking gestural viewpoint as multidimensional rather than a dichotomy. Paper presented at the International Society of Gesture Studies conference, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S., Tran, K., Levine, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Gesture training leads to improvement in children’s mental rotation skill. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., Delacruz, G., & Kumar, M. (2012). Learning physics through play in an augmented reality environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(3), 347–378. doi:10.1007/s11412-012-9150-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & DeLiema, D. (2015). Constructing liminal blends in a collaborative augmented-reality learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 7–34. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9207-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. (1951). Autobiographical notes. In P. A. Schlipp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist (pp. 2–75). New York, NY: Tudor Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K., & Falgier, B. (2004). Conceptual locations and pronominal reference in American sign language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(4), 321–331. doi:10.1023/B:JOPR.0000035104.83502.0b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerofsky, S. (2010). Mathematical learning and gesture: Character viewpoint and observer viewpoint in students’ gestured graphs of functions. Gesture, 10(2–3), 321–343. doi:10.1075/gest.10.2-3.10ger
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. Jr, (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., Black, J., Maxwell, J. W., Plass, J., & Keitges, M. J. (2012). Engaged learning with digital media: The points of viewing theory. In W. M. Reynolds, G. E. Miller, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 7 (Educational psychology) (pp. 321–364). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100(2), 279–297. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. (2010). Action’s influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 664–674. doi:10.1177/1745691610388764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20(3), 267–272. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02297.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1987). Children’s arguing. In S. Phillips, S. Steele, C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender, and sex in a comparative perspective (pp. 200–248). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haviland, J. B. (1993). Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimithirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(1), 3–45. doi:10.1525/jlin.1993.3.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Eberbach, C., & Sinha, S. (2017). Systems learning with a conceptual representation: A quasi-experimental study. Instructional Science, 45(1), 53–72. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9392-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M., DeLiema, D., Chen, R., & Flood, V. J. (2018). Imitation in children’s locomotor play. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 2(1), 1–24. doi:10.1558/rcsi.36016
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, D. (2019). Restrictions on the usage of spatial frames of reference in location and orientation descriptions: Evidence from three Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 39(1), 1–31. doi:10.1080/07268602.2019.1542927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (2014). The cultural ecosystem of human cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 27(1), 34–16. doi:10.1080/09515089.2013.830548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. [Database] doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keifert, D., Lee, C., Dahn, M., Illum, R., DeLiema, D., Enyedy, N., & Danish, J. (2017). Agency, embodiment, & affect during play in a mixed reality learning environment. In Proceedings of the 2017 conference on interaction design and children (pp. 268–277). Stanford, CA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1831–1836. doi:10.1177/0956797613478615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4), 513–549. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. U., & Tversky, B. (2001). Costs of switching perspectives in route and survey description. In J. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 574–579). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–170). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marghetis, T., McComsey, M., & Cooperrider, K. (2020). Space in hand and mind: Gesture and spatial frames of reference in bilingual Mexico. Cognitive Science, 44(12), 1–24. doi:10.1111/cogs.12920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D., & Pedelty, E. (1995). Right brain and gesture. In K. Emmorey & J. S. Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space (pp. 63–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, T., Alessandro, G., Perritano, A., Guerra, P., Lopez-Silva, B., Tissenbaum, M., & Fong, C. (2014). Action and reflection in an embodied foraging simulation. In. T. Moher (Chair), Becoming reflective: Designing for reflection on physical performances. In J. L. Polman. (Eds) Learning and becoming in practice: The international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS) 2014 (Vol. 3, pp. 1273–1282). Boulder, CO: ISLS.
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., Tierney, C., & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 119–172. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1602_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2003). Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nigro, G., & Neisser, U. (1983). Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 467–482. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara, C., & Pérez Báez, G. (2011). Spatial frames of reference in Mesoamerican languages. Language Sciences, 33(6), 837–852. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnafes, O. (2012). Developing explanations and developing understanding: Students explain the phases of the moon using visual representations. Cognition and Instruction, 30(4), 359–403. doi:10.1080/07370008.2012.716885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrill, F. (2009). Dual viewpoint gestures. Gesture, 9(3), 271–289. doi:10.1075/gest.9.3.01par
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrill, F., & Sweetser, E. (2005). What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture, 4(2), 197–219. doi:10.1075/gest.4.2.05par
   Google Scholar
• Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D.P., Levinson, S.C., Kita, S., & Senft, G. (1998). Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language, 74(3), 557–589. doi:10.2307/417793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pier, E. L., Walkington, C., Clinton, V., Boncoddo, R., Williams-Pierce, C., Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2019). Embodied truths: How dynamic gestures and speech contribute to mathematical proof practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 44–57. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine, K. J., Gurney, D. J., & Fletcher, B. (2010). The semantic specificity hypothesis: When gestures do not depend upon the presence of a listener. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(3), 169–178. doi:10.1007/s10919-010-0089-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ, R. S., Scherr, R. E., Hammer, D., & Mikeska, J. (2008). Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science Education, 92(3), 499–525. doi:10.1002/sce.20264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell (2015). Helping hand: Robots, video games, and a radical new approach to treating stroke patients. New Yorker, November 23, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Scherr, R. E., Close, H. G., Close, E. W., Flood, V. J., McKagan, S. B., Robertson, A. D., … Vokos, S. (2013). Negotiating energy dynamics through embodied action in a materially structured environment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(020105), 1-18. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020105
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fall-back. Cognitive Science, 20(4), 457–497. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., & Wilensky, U. (2009). Learning electricity with NIELS: Thinking with electrons and thinking in levels. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(1), 21–50. doi:10.1007/s10758-009-9144-z
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2011). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. J. (2012). The attentional theory of cinematic continuity. Projections, 6(1), 1–27. doi:10.3167/proj.2012.060102
   Google Scholar
• So, W. C., Kita, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Using hands to identity who does what to whom: Gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 115–125. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01006.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, F. F., & Owens, S. A. (2001). Evolution's pedagogy: An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainment. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1(4), 289–321. doi:10.1163/156853701753678305
   Google Scholar
• Stec, K. (2012). Meaningful shifts: A review of viewpoint markers in co-speech gesture and sign language. Gesture, 12(3), 327–360. doi:10.1075/gest.12.3.03ste
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stec, K., & Huiskes, M. (2014). Co-constructing referential space in multimodal narratives. Cognitive Semiotics, 7(1), 31–59. doi:10.1515/cogsem-2014-0003
   Google Scholar
• Stieff, M., Lira, M. E., & Scopelitis, S. A. (2016). Gesture supports spatial thinking in STEM. Cognition and Instruction, 34(2), 80–99. doi:10.1080/07370008.2016.1145122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1996). Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(3), 371–391. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., Tucker‐Raymond, E., Kane, J., Hankes, J., Ortiz, I., & Keblawe‐Shamah, N. (2010). Drama activities as ideational resources for primary‐grade children in urban science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 302–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Frisch, K. (1967). The dance language and orientation of bees. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. doi:10.1037/a0016127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ognonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 529–552.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19. doi:10.1023/A:1009421303064
   Google Scholar