Why Would I Use This in My Home? A Model of Domestic Social Robot Acceptance

REFERENCES

• Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1355–1374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about IT usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694. doi:10.2307/3250951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlgren, D., & Verner, I. (2009, August). Fostering development of students’ collective and self-efficacy in robotics projects. In Kim, J.H., Sam Ge, S., Vadakkepat, P., Jesse, N., Al Mamun, A., Puthusserypady, S., Rückert, U., Sitte, J., Witkowski, U., Nakatsu, R., Braunl, T., Baltes, J., Anderson, J., Wong, C.C., & Ahlgren, D. (Eds), Proceedings of the FIRA RoboWorld Congress 2009 (Vol. 44, pp. 240–247). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–221. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. London, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arras, K. O., & Cerqui, D. (2005). Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots. Lausanne, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, EPFL.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397–438. doi:10.1080/10705510903008204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., Lee, H. M., & Van Loo, M. F. (2001). Decisions to donate bone marrow: The role of attitudes and subjective norms across cultures. Psychology and Health, 16, 29–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unified theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J.A., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (1994). Environmental control of goal directed action: Automatic and strategic contingencies between situation and behavior. Paper presented at the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln, NE, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Mubin, O. and Mahmud, A.A. (2009). Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 71–81. doi:10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Mubin, O. and Mahmud, A.A. (2009). Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kennsuke, K. (2005). A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Las Vegas.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Nomura, T. (2007). The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with AIBO on their attitude towards robots. AI & Society, 21(1–2), 217–230. doi:10.1007/s00146-006-0052-7
   Google Scholar
• Ben Allouch, S., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Peters, O. (2009). The acceptance of domestic ambient intelligence appliances by prospective users. Proceedings of the Pervasive 2009 International Conference on Pervasive Computing. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Speckart, G. (1981). Attitudes “cause” behaviors: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 226–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments, 12(5), 456–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breazeal, C. L. (2003). Towards sociable robots. Robotics & Automation Systems, 42(3–4), 167–175. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breckler, S.J., & Wiggins, E.C. (1989). On defining attitude and attitude theory: Once more with feeling. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald. (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 407–427). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009). Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(4), 319–330. doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 399–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A., Chopita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 179–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(1), 111–150. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Buller, D. B. (1996). Reflections on the nature of theory building and the theoretical status of interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 311–328. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The meta-cognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of anxiety disorders, 11(3), 279–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), StatLine: Bevolking; kerncijfers. Den Haag/Heerlen, The Netherlands: CBS.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher’s corner: Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 471–492. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1203_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii–xvi.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, H., Evers, V., Ramlal, S., van Someren, M., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., … Wielinga, B. (2008). The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Model User-Adapt Interaction, 18(5), 455–496. doi:10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuijpers, R. H., Bruna, M. T., Ham, J. R. C., & Torta, E. (2011). Attitude towards robots depends on interaction but not on anticipatory behavior. In B. Mutlu, C. Bartneck, J. Ham, V. Evers, T. Kanda (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICSR 2011 International Conference on Social Robotics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dautenhahn, K., & Saunders, J. (2011). New frontiers in human–robot interaction (Vol. 2). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M. L., Koay, K. L., & Werry, I. (2005). What is a robot companion: Friend, assistant or butler? Proceedings of the IROS 2005 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, M. M. A. (2016). An ethical evaluation of human-robot relationships. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(4), 589–598. doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0368-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf, M. M. A., & Ben Allouch, S. (2013a). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61, 1476–1486. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf, M. M. A., & Ben Allouch, S. (2013b). The relation between people’s attitude and anxiety towards robots in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the RO-MAN 2013 International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, M. M. A., & Ben Allouch, S. (2016). Anticipating our future robot society: The evaluation of future robot applications from a user’s perspective. Proceedings of the RO-MAN 2016 International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, M. M. A., Ben Allouch, S., & Klamer, T. (2015). Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship building with a social robot. Computers in Human Behavior, 43(1), 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf, M. M. A., Ben Allouch, S., & Lutfi, S. (2016). What are people’s associations of robots? Comparing implicit and explicit measures. Proceedings of the RO-MAN 2016 International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, M. M. A., Ben Allouch, S., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015). What makes a robot social? A user’s perspective on characteristics for social human–robot interaction. In Agah, A., Cabibihan, J.-J., Howard, A., Salichs, M.A., He, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICSR 2015 International Conference on Social Robotics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, M. M. A., Ben Allouch, S., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2016). Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. Interaction Studies, 17(3), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ruyter, B., Saini, P., Markopoulos, P., & van Breemen, A. (2005). Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home. Interacting with Computers, 17(5), 522–541. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSteno, D., Breazeal, C., Frank, R. H., Pizarro, D., Baumann, J., Dickens, L., & Lee, J. J. (2012). Detecting the trustworthiness of novel partners in economic exchange. Psychological Science, 23, 1549–1556, 0956797612448793. doi:10.1177/0956797612448793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theories and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32, 1422–1433. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enz, S., Diruf, M., Spielhagen, C., Zoll, C., & Vargas, P. A. (2011). The social role of robots in the future: Explorative measurement of hopes and fears. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(3), 263–271. doi:10.1007/s12369-011-0094-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Public attitudes towards robots (Special Eurobarometer 382). Brussel, Belgium: Kantar Public.
   Google Scholar
• Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2009a). Attitudinal and intentional acceptance of domestic robots by younger and older adults. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2009b). More than a servant: Self-reported willingness of younger and older adults to having a robot perform interactive and critical tasks in the home. Proceedings of the HFES 2009 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, J., Bauwens, V., Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Living with a vacuum cleaning robot: A 6-month ethnographic study. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3), 389–408. doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0190-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, UK: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. J., & Price, L. L. (1992). An investigation into the social context of early adoption behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 477–486. doi:10.1086/jcr.1992.19.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flandorfer, P. (2012). Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: The importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. International Journal of Population Research, 2012, 1–13. doi:10.1155/2012/829835
   Google Scholar
• Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 143–166. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., & Powers, A. (2003). Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. Proceedings of the RO-MAN 2003 International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1995). Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 42, 203–214. doi:10.1109/17.403738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A.G. (1989). Why are attitudes important? In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Ed.), Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Groom, V., Nass, C., Chen, T., Nielsen, A., Scarborough, J. K., & Robles, E. (2009). Evaluating the effects of behavioral realism in embodied agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(10), 842–849. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J., & Balke, G. (1993). General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28(4), 407–434. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2804_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackbarth, G., Grover, V., & Yi, M. Y. (2003). Computer playfulness and anxiety: Positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management, 40(3), 221–232. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00006-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics, 53(5), 517–527. doi:10.1177/0018720811417254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human–Computer Interaction, 19(4), 319–349. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361–375. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the use of websites: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6), 541–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. (1998). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Family Science Review, 11, 354–373.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., Liao, H., & Chang, S. (1998). Social desirability and the Clinical Self-Report Inventory: Methodological reconsideration. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 517–528. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of Robotics. (2014). World robotics report 2014. Retrieved from http://www.worldrobotics.org/uploads/media/Executive_Summary_WR_2014_02.pdf (accessed February 7, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C.E. (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschinski, C., & Ben Allouch, S. (2015). Why should I use this?: Identifying incentives for using AAL technologies. Proceedings of the Ami 2015 European Conference on Ambient Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Joosse, M., Sardar, A., Lohse, M., & Evers, V. (2013). BEHAVE-II: The revised set of measures to assess users’ attitudinal and behavioral responses to a social robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3), 379–388. doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0191-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). Efficient estimation in image factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(1), 51–75. doi:10.1007/BF02290173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H., Friedman, B., Perez-Granados, D. R., & Freier, N. G. (2006). Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 405–436. doi:10.1075/is.7.3.13kah
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H., Gary, H. E., & Shen, S. (2013). Children’s social relationships with current and near-future robots. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 32–37. doi:10.1111/cdep.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., & Kanda, T. (2006, September). What is a human?-Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Hatfield, UK: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., & Limayem, M. (2000). E-mail and V-mail usage: Generalizing across technologies. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 49–66. doi:10.1207/S15327744JOCE100103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Social Psychology, 37(4), 509–523. doi:10.1086/268109
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(3), 333–351. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M., & Bruner, G. (2000). Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology and Marketing, 17(2), 79–103. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kmenta, J. (1971). Elements of econometrics. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• LaRose, R., & Eastin, M. S. (1994). A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 358–377. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4803_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. R., & Sabanovic, S. (2014). Culturally variable preferences for robot design and use in South Korea, Turkey and the United States. Proceedings of the HRI 2014 International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Park, N., & Song, H. (2005). Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature?: Effects of a robot’s long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people’s social responses toward it. Human Communication Research, 31, 538–563. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00882.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, S. R. (2006). Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 962–973. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 752–780.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Lee, Z. (2006). Social influence on technology behaviour: Self-identity theory perspective. ACM SIGMIS Database, 37(2–3), 60–75. doi:10.1145/1161345.1161355
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., Rau, P. L. P., & Li, Y. (2010). A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(2), 175–186. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0056-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C., Chen, J. L., & Yen, D. C. (2007). Theory of planned behavior (TPB) and customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2804–2822. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limayem, M., & Hirt, S. G. (2003). Force of habit and information system usage: Theory and initial validation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 65–97.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. S. (2010). Student satisfaction and self-efficacy in a cooperative robotics course. Social Behavior and Personality, 38, 1135–1146. doi:10.2224/sbp.2010.38.8.1135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15, 336–355. doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manstead, A. S. R., & Parker, D. (1995). Evaluating and extending the theory of planned behavior. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 69–95.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32, 86–112. doi:10.1145/506724.506730
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41(3), 261–266.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & Daly, J. A. (1975). The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 323–332. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00281.x
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. doi:10.1080/03637759909376464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melson, G. F., Kahn, P. H., Beck, A., & Friedman, B. (2009). Robotic pets in human lives: Implications for the human-animal bond and for human relationships with personified technologies. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 545–567. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miniard, P. W. (1981). Examining the diagnostic utility of the Fishbein behavioral intention model. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. W., & Kim, J. G. (2000). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38, 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H. W., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 395–436). New York, NY: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angelos, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Mutlu, B. (2011). Designing embodied cues for dialog with robots. AI Magazine, 32(4), 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2006). Exploratory investigation onto influence of negative attitudes towards robots in human-robot interaction. AI & Society, 20, 138–150. doi:10.1007/s00146-005-0012-7
   Google Scholar
• Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., Yamada, S., & Kato, K. (2009). Influences of concerns toward emotional interaction into social acceptability of robots. Proceedings of the HRI 2009 International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Han, J., Shin, N., Burke, J., & Kato, K. (2008). What people assume about humanoid and animal-type robots: Cross-cultural analysis between Japan, Korea, and the United States. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 5(1), 25–46. doi:10.1142/S0219843608001297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. Sydney, Australia: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz De Guinea, A., & Markus, M. L. (2009). Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 433–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and socialpsychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79–98. doi:10.1348/014466601164704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, O. (2011). Three theoretical perspectives on communication technology adoption. In A. Vishwanath, & G.A. Barnett (Eds.), The diffusions of innovations: A communication science perspective. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, O., & Ben Allouch, S. (2005). Always connected: A longitudinal field study of mobile communication. Telematics and Informatics, 22, 239–256. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2004.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Ray, C., Mondada, F., & Siegwart, R. (2008). What do people expect from robots? Proceedings of the IROS 2008 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, R., Pligt, J., & Vries, N. (1995). Anticipated affective reactions and prevention of AIDS. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34(1), 9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 51–67. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Social influences and the theory of planned behavior: Evidence of a direct relationship between prototypes and young people's exercises behavior. Psychology and Health, 18, 567–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Hoffmann, L., Sobieraj, S., & Eimler, S. C. (2013). An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(1), 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M. (1983). Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations. Journal of Broadcasting, 27(1), 37–51. doi:10.1080/08838158309386471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. B., & Martin, M. M. (1994). Development of a measure of interpersonal communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 11(1), 33–44. doi:10.1080/08824099409359938
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šabanović, S. (2010). Robots in society, society in robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2, 439–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem, M., Eyssel, F., Rohlfing, K., Kopp, S., & Joublin, F. (2013). To err is human (-like): Effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3), 313–323. doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0196-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass, D. A., & Schmitt, T. A. (2010). A comparative investigation of rotation criteria within exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(1), 73–103. doi:10.1080/00273170903504810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scopelliti, M., Giuliani, M.V., & Fornara, F. (2005). Robots in a domestic setting: A psychological approach. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 146–155.
   Google Scholar
• Serenko, A. (2008). A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification. Interacting with Computers, 20(4–5), 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Augmenting the theory of planned behavior: Roles for anticipated regret and descriptive norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2107–2142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendation and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. H., & Choo, H. (2011). Modeling the acceptance of socially interactive robotics: Social presence in human-robot interaction. Interaction Studies, 12(3), 430–460. doi:10.1075/is.12.3.04shi
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of ICTs: Technical change and everyday life. In R. Silverstone, & R. Mansell (Eds.), Communication by design. The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 44–74). Oxford: Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, R. Q., Broadbent, E., Jayawardena, C., Unger, U., Kuo, I. H., Igic, A., Wong, R., Kerse, N., Watson, C., & MacDonald, B. A. (2010). Improved robot attitudes and emotions at a retirement home after meeting a robot. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), Viareggio, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D. W., & Burton-Jones, A. (2007). Veni, vidi, vici: Breaking the TAM logjam. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H. S., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szajna, B. (1996). Emperical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85–92. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayama, L., Ju, W., & Nass, C. (2008). Beyond dirty, dangerous, and dull: What everyday people think robots should do. Proceedings of the HRI 2008 International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 6(1), 35–39. doi:10.1177/875647939000600106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1979). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Paper presented at the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln, Nebraska.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in experimental social psychology, 29, 271–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71–102. doi:10.2307/3250959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wand, X. (2011). The role of anticipated negative emotions and past behavior in individuals’ physical activity intentions and behaviors. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(3), 300–305. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, A., Igelsböck, J., Wurhofer, D., & Tscheligi, M. (2011). Looking forward to a ‘robot society’?: Notions of future human–robot relationships. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(2), 111–123. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0076-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, S. J., Han, S. H., & Huang, W. (2012). The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-learning in the workplace: A case from South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 942–950. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. E., Hawkins, R., Sharlin, E., & Igarashi, T. (2007). Towards acceptable domestic robots: Applying insights from social psychology. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 95–108. doi:10.1007/s12369-008-0006-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. E., Sung, J. Y., Voida, A., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T., Christensen, H. I., & Grinter, R. E. (2011). Evaluating human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(1), 53–67. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0081-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007a). Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1. Journal of Modeling in Management, 2(3), 251–280. doi:10.1108/17465660710834453
   Google Scholar
• Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007b). Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 2. Journal of Modeling in Management, 2(3), 281–304. doi:10.1108/17465660710834462
   Google Scholar
• Yu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M., & Rho, J. (2005). Extending the TAM for a t-commerce. Information & Management, 42, 965–976. doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.11.001./
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar