Creating Interdependencies: Managing Incidents in Large Organizational Environments

REFERENCES

• Anderson, R., Hughes, J., & Sharrock, W. (1989). Working for profit. Farnborough: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. J. (1994). Representation and Requirements: The value of ethnography in system design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9 (2), 151–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki, P. M. (2009). Does voice co-ordination have to be “rocket science. In T. Erickson & D. W. McDonald (Eds.), HCI remixed: Reflections on works that have influenced tyeh HCI Commuinity (pp. 179–184). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, S., & Greenhalgh, C. (1997). Introducing third party objects into the spatial model of interaction. In J. A. Hughes, W. Prinz, T. Rodden, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), ECSCW ‘97 (pp. 189–204). Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Berndtsson, J., & Normark, M. (1999). The coordinative functions of flight strips: Air traffic control work revisited. In GROUP ’99: Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work (pp. 101–110). Phoenix, Arizona, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. M., & Martin, D. (1999). Informing collaborative information visualization through an ethnography of ambulance control. In S. Bødker, M. Kyng, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), ECSCW’99 Proceedings of the sixth conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 309–330). Copenhagen, Denmark: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Button, G., & King, V. (1992). Hanging around is not the point: Calling ethnography to account. In Workshop on Ethnography and CSCW System Design, CSCW’94. Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A. (2003). Designing collaborative systems: A practical guide to ethnography. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A., Rouncefield, M., & Tolmie, P. (2012). Doing design ethnography. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Filippi, G., & Theureau, J. (1993). Analysing cooperative work in an urban traffic control room for the design of a coordination support system. In G. De Michelis, C. Simone, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), ECSCW ’93 (pp. 171–186). Milan, Italy: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1990). Announcements in their environment: Back-to-back interaction in a multi-activity work setting. In 12th World Congress for Research on Activity Theory. Lahti, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Informings and announcements in their environment: Prosody in a multi-activity setting. In E. Couper-Huhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 436–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., & Hughes, J. (1993). What a f-ing system! Send ‘em all to the same place and then expect us to stop ‘em hitting: Making Technology Work in Air Traffic Control. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in Working Order (pp. 127–144). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., Hughes, J., & Shapiro, D. (1989a). Harmonious Working and CSCW: Computer Technology and Air Traffic Control. In J. Bowers & S. D. Benford (Eds.), ECSCW ’89 (pp. 73–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., Hughes, J., & Shapiro, D. (1989b). The functionality of flight strips in ATC work: The report for the civil aviation authority. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster Sociotechnics Group, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Jirotka, M., Luff, P., & Hindmarsh, J. (1994). Unpacking collaboration: The interactional organisation of trading in a city dealing room. CSCW, 3(2), 147–165.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in london underground line control rooms. CSCW Journal, 1(1–2), 69–94.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1996). Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on london underground. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 96–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1996a). Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 96–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1996b). Documents and professional practice: “ bad ” organisational reasons for “ good ” clinical records. In M. Ackerman (Ed.), Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (pp. 354–363).
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Luff, P., & Sanchez Svensson, M. (2002). Overseeing organisations: Configuring action and its environment of action. British Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 181–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C. C., Luff, P., & Nicholls, G. M. (1995). The collaborative production of the document: Context, genre and the borderline in design. In The International Workshop on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP’95) (pp. 203–218). Sophia-Antipolis: INRIA.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C. C., & Nicholls, G. M. (1997). Animating texts: Selective readings of news stories. In L. B. Resnick & R. Saljo (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: situated cognition & technologically supported environments. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1855–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., Randall, D. R., & Shapiro, D. (1992). Faltering from ethnography to design. In J. Turner & R. Kraut (Eds.), CSCW ‘92 (pp. 115–122). Toronto, Canada: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., Shapiro, D., Sharrock, W. W., Anderson, R. A., Harper, R., & Gibbons, S. C. (1988). The automation of air traffic control. Lancaster, UK: Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Jirotka, M., Luff, P., & Heath, C. C. (1993). Requirements for technology in complex environments: Tasks and interaction in a city dealing room. SIGOIS Bulletin (Special Issue) Do Users Get What They Want? (DUG ’93), 14(2–December), 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C., & Tuncer, S. (2014). Attending to a summons and putting other activities onhold: Multiactivity as a recognisable interactional accomplishment. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Neville (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 167–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Luff, P., & Heath, C. (2000). The collaborative production of computer commands in command and control. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 669–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luff, P., & Heath, C. (2002). Broadcast talk: Initiating calls through a computer-mediated technology. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 35(3), 337–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luff, P., & Heath, C. (2012). Some “technical challenges” of video analysis: Social actions, objects, material realities and the problems of perspective. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 255–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luff, P., & Heath, C. C. (1998). Mobility in collaboration. In S. Poltrock & J. Grudin (Eds.), CSCW’98 (pp. 305–314). Seattle, WA: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Heath, C. C., & Jirotka, M. (2000). Surveying the scene: Technologies for everyday awareness and monitoring in control rooms. Interacting With Computers, 13, 193–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. management science. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike09-20&path=ASIN/0521598214
   Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Jirotka, M., Heath, C. C., & Greatbatch, D. (1993). Tasks and social interaction: The relevance of naturalistic analyses of conduct for requirements engineering. In RE’93: IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (pp. 187–190). San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, W. (1999). Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 6(4), 311–340.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, K., Perry, M., Churchill, E., & Russell, D. (2003). Public and situated displays: Social and interactional aspects of shared display technologies. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, D., Harper, R., & Rouncefield, M. (2007). Fieldwork for design: Theory and practice. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, D. R., & Schmidt, K. (2016). Reconsidering “Awareness” in CSCW. CSCW Journal, 25, 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvadori, F. (2016). Open office interaction: Initiating talk at work. PhD Thesis. King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. (2002). The problem with “Awareness”: Introductory remarks on “Awareness in CSCW.”. Comput. Supported Coop. Work, 11(3), 285–298.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. (2011). Cooperative work and coordinattive practices: Contributions to the Concdptuakl Foundations of Computer-Suppotrted Cooperative Work (CSCW). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. (2016). Preface to the special issue on “Reconsidering ‘Awareness’ in CSCW.”. CSCW Journal, 25(4–5), 229–233.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K., Heath, C., & Rodden, T. (2002). Special issue of international journal of computer supported cooperative work: Awareness (Vol. 11). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K., & Simone, C. (1996). Coordination mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of CSCW Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work:. The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 5(2–3), 155–200.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D., Hughes, J., Randall, D., & Harper, R. (1991).Visual re-representation of database information: The flight-data strip in air-traffic control. In M. J. Tauber,d. e. Mahling & F.Arefi (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of visual languages and visual interfaces. Amsterda: Elsevier Science. pp. (249–376) Shärding.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerville, I., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., & Bentley, R. (1993). Sociologists can be Surprisingly Useful in Interactive Systems Design. In A. Monk, D. Diaper, & M. D. Harrison (Eds.), People and computers VII: Proceedings of HCI 92’, York, September 1992 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. HCI’92. (pp. 342–354). York.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1993). Technologies of accountability: On lizards and aeroplanes. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order (pp. 113–126). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1996). Constituting shared workspaces. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 35–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1997). Centers of Coordination: A case and some themes. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 41–62). BerlIn Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenberg, J., Roth, W.-M., & Socha, D. (2016). From I-Awareness to We-Awareness in CSCW. CSCW Journal, 25(4–5), 235–278.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. (1970). Words, utterances, activities. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology. London and Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, J. C., Woods, D. D., Corban, J. M., Patterson, E. S., Kerr, R. L., & Hicks, L. C. (1996). Voice loops as cooperative aids in space shuttle mission control. In M. S. Ackerman (Ed.), CSCW ’96 (pp. 48–56). Cambridge, MA: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, J. (1995a). A technology of order production: Computer-aided dispatch in public safety communications. In P. Ten Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organisation of talk and embodied activities (pp. 187–230). Washington: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, J. (1995b). Expert systems vs. systems for experts: Computer-aided dispatch as a support system in real-world environments. In P. Thomas (Ed.), The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces (pp. 161–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, J., & Vinkhuyzen, E. (2000). Expert systems in (inter)action: Diagnosing document machine problems over the telephone. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, & C. Heath (Eds.), Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design (pp. 92–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, J., Whalen, M., & Henderson, K. (2002). Improvisational choreography in a teleservice work. British Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 239–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, J., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Observations on the display and management of emotion in naturally occurring activities: The case of “Hysteria” in calls to 9-1-1. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(1), 141–159.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, M., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 172–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar