The Allure and the Paucity of Design: Cultures of Design and Design in Culture

References

• Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7, 295–310. doi:10.1177/026327690007002017
   Google Scholar
• Avle, S., Lindtner, S., & Williams, K. (2017). How methods make designers. Proceedings of the CHI 2017 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17), 472–483. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Barbrook, R. (2007). Imaginary Futures: From Thinking Machines to the Global Village. London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., Dalsgaard, P., Gross, S., & Halskov, K. (2016). Documenting the research through design process. Proceedings of the DIS 2016 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 96–107. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Antanitis, J. (2012). Critical design and critical thinking: The challenge of designing for provocation. Proceedings of the DIS 2012 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 288–297. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Basballe, D., & Halskov, K. (2012). Dynamics of research through design. Proceedings of the DIS 2012 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 58–67. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Baumer, E., & Silberman, S. (2011). When the implication is not to design. Proceedings of the CHI 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2271–2274. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., & Kyng, M. (2018). Participatory design that matters – Facing the big issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(1), Article 4, 31. doi:10.1145/3152421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, S. (1972, December 7). Fanatic life and symbolic death among the computer bums. Rolling Stone
   Google Scholar
• Brand, S. (1987). The media lab: Inventing the future at MIT. New York, NY: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bremner, C., & Rodgers, P. (2013). Design without discipline. Design Issues, 29(3), 4–13. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design. New York, NY: Harper-Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29–43. doi:10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. (Ed). (1996). Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. (2012). Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., & Brynjarsdóttir, H. (2010). Mapping the Landscape of Sustainable HCI. Proceedings of the CHI 2010 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1975–1984. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–27.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2011). The core of `design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for Design. Proceedings of the CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 541–550. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2010). HCI and environmental sustainability: The politics of design and the design of politics. Proceedings of the DIS 2010 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 1–10. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, K., & Grinter, R. (2001). At home with ubiquitous computing: Seven challenges. Proceedings of the Unocomp 2001 Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 256–272. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P., Nilsson, E., & Topgaard, R. (2014). Making futures: Marginal notes on innovation, design, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fallman, D. (2003). Design-oriented human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the CHI 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 225–232. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine: “development,” depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimura, J. (1987). Constructing “Do-able” problems in cancer research: Articulating alignment. Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 257–293. doi:10.1177/030631287017002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design? Proceedings of the CHI 2012 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 937–946. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in the professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. doi:10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 716–749. doi:10.2307/2393655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, L. (2013). Inventive Infrastructures: An Exploration of Mobile Phone “Repair” Cultures in Kampala, Uganda. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Lancaster, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Huppatz, D. J. (2015). Revisiting Herbert Simon’s ‘science of design’. Design Issues, 31(2), 29–40. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, L. (2015). Hackathons and the making of entrepreneurial citizenship. science. Technology & Human Values, 40(5), 799–824. doi:10.1177/0162243915578486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, L. (Forthcominga). Innovators and their others. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L. (Forthcomingb). Design Thinking”: Defending silicon valley at the apex of global labor hierarchies. Catalyst.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L., Dourish, P., & Mazmanian, M. (2010). Shopping for sharpies in seattle: Mundane infrastructures of transnational design. Proceedings of the ICIC 2010 Conference on Intercultural Collaboration ICIC 2010, 39–48. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L., & Silberman, S. (2016). Stories we tell about labor: Turkopticon and the problem of ‘design’. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4573–4586. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, J. (2007). The tenuous relationship between design and innovation. Artifact, 1(3), 198–203. doi:10.1080/17493460701812129
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, K. (2011). Thoughts on interaction design. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Lindtner, S. (2015). Hacking with Chinese Characteristics: The Promises of the Maker Movement against China’s Manufacturing Culture. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(5), 854–879.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Goncalves, J., Ferreira, D., Xiao, B., Hosio, S., & Kostakos, V. (2014). CHI 1994-2013: Mapping two decades of intellectual progress through co-word analysis. Proceedings of the CHI 2014 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3553–3562. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lowgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2011). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, V. and Margolin, S. (2002). A “Social Model” of Design: Issues of Practice and Research. Design Issues, 18(4), 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (2016). Be Creative. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York, NY: Public Affairs Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. (2016). Design and anthropology. Annual Reviews of Anthropology, 45, 433–449. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-100224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, H., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. (1971). Notes on a proposal for a psychological research unit. AIP Memo #1, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2007). The design of future things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, A., & Hornbaek, K. (2016). HCI Research as Problem-Solving. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4956–4967. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, J. (2017). Chi4good or Good for CHI? Proceedings of the CHI 2017 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Extended Abstracts), 709–721. NewYork, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., & Marcus, G. (2008). Designs for an anthropology of the contemporary. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjan, M. P. (1997). Design visualization. Ahmedabad, India: National institute of design. ( Downloaded from https://www.scribd.com/document/21342217/M-P-Ranjan-Design-Visual-is-at-Ion-1997, April 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, P. (2016). Fluid technologies: The bush pump, the lifestraw(R) and microworlds of humanitarian design. Social Studies of Science, 46(2), 159–183. doi:10.1177/0306312715620061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner, D. (2015). Reshaping the limits of design in HCI. Interactions, 22(2), 67–69. doi:10.1145/2740010
   Google Scholar
• Shilton, K. (2013). Values levers: Building ethics into design. Science. Technology & Human Values, 38(3), 374–397. doi:10.1177/0162243912436985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skjerven, A. (2017). Design without borders: Ideologies, realities, and results. Design Issues, 33(1), 17–29. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2015). Upon opening the black box and finding it full: Exploring the ethics in design practices. Science. Technology & Human Values, 40(3), 389–420. doi:10.1177/0162243914547645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunstall, E. (2013). Decolonizing Design Innovation. In O. Gunn & Smith (eds), Design anthropology: Theory and practice (pp. 232–250). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, F. (2008). From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart brand, the whole earth network, and the rise of digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, T. (Ed). (1996). Bringing design to software. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proceedings of the CHI 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing, 493–502. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar