Interaction Strategies for Effective Augmented Reality Geo-Visualization: Insights from Spatial Cognition

REFERENCES

• Abend, P., Thielmann, T., Ewerth, R., Seiler, D., Mühling, M., Döring, J., … Freisleben, B. (2012). Geobrowsing behaviour in google earth – A semantic video content analysis of on-screen navigation. In T. Jekel, A. Car, J. Strobl, & G. Griesebner (Eds.), GI_forum 2012: Geovisualization, society and learning (pp. 2–13). Berlin/Offenbach: Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Salzburg, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Agostinelli, C., & Lund, U. (2017). R package “circular”: Circular statistics (version 0.4-93). Retrieved from https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/circular/
   Google Scholar
• Apple. (2018). Google ARCore. Retrieved July 26, 2018, from https://developers.google.com/ar/
   Google Scholar
• Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. L., & Reagan, I. (2009). Individual differences in route-learning strategy and associated working memory resources. Human Factors, 51(3), 368–377. doi:10.1177/0018720809338187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bediou, B., Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., Tipton, E., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2018). Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 77–110. doi:10.1037/bul0000130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beitzel, S., Dykstra, J., Huver, S., Kaplan, M., Loushine, M., & Youzwak, J. (2016). Cognitive performance impact of augmented reality for network operations tasks. In Advances in human factors in cybersecurity. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 501, pp. 139–151), D. Nicholson (ed). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41932-9_12
   Google Scholar
• Beitzel, S., Dykstra, J., Toliver, P., & Youzwak, J. (2018). Exploring 3D cybersecurity visualization with the microsoft holoLens (pp. 197–207). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60585-2_19
   Google Scholar
• Berens, P. (2009). CircStat: A MATLAB toolbox for circular statistics. Journal of Statistical Software, 31(10), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besançon, L., Issartel, P., Ammi, M., & Isenberg, T. (2017). Mouse, tactile, and tangible input for 3D manipulation. Proceedings of the CHI 2017 conference on human factors in computing, New York: ACM.doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025863
   Google Scholar
• Biljecki, F., Stoter, J., Ledoux, H., Zlatanova, S., & Çöltekin, A. (2015). Applications of 3D city models: State of the art review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(4), 2842–2889. doi:10.3390/ijgi4042842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blattgerste, J., Strenge, B., Renner, P., Pfeiffer, T., & Essig, K. (2017). Comparing conventional and augmented reality instructions for manual assembly tasks. Proceedings of the PETRA 2017 international conference on PErvasive technologies related to assistive environments, New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/3056540.3056547
   Google Scholar
• Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F., Simons, D. J., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2008). The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. Acta Psychologica, 129(3), 387–398. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, A. C., Haniff, D. J., Baber, C., & Steiner, S. J. (1999). Virtual reality and augmented reality as a training tool for assembly tasks. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on information visualization (Cat. No. PR00210) (pp. 32–36), London, UK. IEEE Comput. Soc. doi: 10.1109/IV.1999.781532
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. A., McMahan, C., Stinson, C., Ragan, E. D., Scerbo, S., Hollerer, T., … Kopper, R. (2012). Evaluating effectiveness in virtual environments with MR simulation. Proceedings of the I/ITSEC 2012 conference on interservice/Industry training, simulation and education, Orlando, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., Gardony, A. L., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2012). Going to town: Visualized perspectives and navigation through virtual environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 257–266. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Extended experience benefits spatial mental model development with route but not survey descriptions. Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 340–354. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When goals constrain: Eye movements and memory for goal-oriented map study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 772–787. doi:10.1002/acp.1508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusilovsky, P., & Millán, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In The adaptive web (pp. 3–53), P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, & W. Nejdl (Eds.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1
   Google Scholar
• Buchroithner, M. F., & Knust, C. (2013). True-3D in cartography—current hard- and softcopy developments. In A. Moore & I. Drecki (Eds.), Geospatial visualisation (pp. 41–65). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12289-7_3
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, G. E., & Lee, K. (2005). The effect of vehicle navigation systems on the formation of cognitive maps. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Traffic and transport psychology - theory and application (pp. 407–418). Amsterdam, Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Büschel, W., Reipschläger, P., Langner, R., & Dachselt, R. (2017). Investigating the use of spatial interaction for 3D data visualization on mobile devices. Proceedings of the ISS 2017 conference on interactive surfaces and spaces, New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/3132272.3134125
   Google Scholar
• Calinski, T., & Harabasz, J. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 3(1), 1–27. doi:10.1080/03610927408827101
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H., & Cohen, M. F. (2017). Panning and Zooming high-resolution panoramas in virtual reality devices. Proceedings of the UIST 2017 symposium on user interface software and technology, New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/3126594.3126617
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. doi:10.1177/0963721409359277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, N., Kharel, P., & Gruev, V. (2017). Augmented reality with microsoft HOLOLENS holograms for near infrared fluorescence based image guided surgery. In B. W. Pogue & S. Gioux (Eds.), Proc. SPIE 10049, molecular-guided surgery: Molecules, devices, and applications III (Vol. 10049, pp. 100490I), New York, NY, USA. International Society for Optics and Photonics. doi: 10.1117/12.2251625
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., & Ge, S. S. (2003). Autonomous vehicle positioning with GPS in urban canyon environments. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19(1), 15–25. doi:10.1109/ROBOT.2001.932759
   Google Scholar
• Darken, R. P., & Cevik, H. (1999). Map usage in virtual environments: Orientation issues. Proceedings IEEE virtual reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316) (pp. 133–140). IEEE Comput. Soc. doi: 10.1109/VR.1999.756944
   Google Scholar
• Dey, A., Billinghurst, M., Lindeman, R. W., & Swan, J. E. (2018). A systematic review of 10 years of augmented reality usability studies: 2005 to 2014. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 37. doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dünser, A., Billinghurst, M., Wen, J., Lehtinen, V., & Nurminen, A. (2012). Exploring the use of handheld AR for outdoor navigation. Computers & Graphics, 36(8), 1084–1095. doi:10.1016/J.CAG.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, R. B. R., French, J. J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton NJ Educational Testing Service, 102(41), 117. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506897102
   Google Scholar
• ES3DStudios. (2013). RT organic city 01. Retrieved July 1, 2016, from https://www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/organically-city-max/779190
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. W., & Pezdek, K. (1980). Cognitive mapping: Knowledge of real-world distance and location information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(1), 13–24. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.1.13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer, G. (2001). User modeling in human–computer interaction. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(1/2), 65–86. doi:10.1023/A:1011145532042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardony, A. L., Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2013). How navigational aids impair spatial memory: Evidence for divided attention. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 13(4), 319–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardony, A. L., Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2015). Navigational aids and spatial memory impairment: The role of divided attention. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 15(4). doi:10.1080/13875868.2015.1059432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. (1958). An extension of box’s results on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(3), 885–891. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706545
   Google Scholar
• Genolini, C., Alacoque, X., Sentenac, M., & Arnaud, C. (2015). kml and kml3d: R packages to cluster longitudinal data. Journal of Statistical Software, 65(4), 1–34. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v65/i04/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google. (2018). Apple ARKit. Retrieved July 26, 2018, from https://developer.apple.com/arkit/
   Google Scholar
• Gras, D., Gyselinck, V., Perrussel, M., Orriols, E., & Piolino, P. (2012). The role of working memory components and visuospatial abilities in route learning within a virtual environment. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1–13. doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.739154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlight Insights. (2018). 2018 augmented reality industry report. Retrieved July 27, 2018, from https://greenlightinsights.com/industry-analysis/2018-augmented-reality-industry-report/
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, M., & Proctor, M. (2016). Three-dimensional display technologies for anatomical education: A literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 641–654. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9619-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedley, N. R., Billinghurst, M., Postner, L., May, R., & Kato, H. (2002). Explorations in the use of augmented reality for geographic visualization. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(2), 119–133. doi:10.1162/1054746021470577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K., & Subbiah, I. (2002). Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence, 30(5), 425–448. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00116-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Smallman, H. S., Stull, A. T., & Canham, M. S. (2009). Naïve cartography: How intuitions about display configuration can hurt performance. Cartographica: the International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 44(3), 171–186. doi:10.3138/carto.44.3.171
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32(2), 175–191. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, L., & Stachoň, Z. (2016). Comparison of user performance with interactive and static 3D visualization-pilot study. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLI-B2, 655–661. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B2-655-2016
   Google Scholar
• Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., Lazer, D., Redish, A. D., & Couzin, I. D. (2015). Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(1), 46–54. doi:10.1016/J.TICS.2014.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockett, P., & Ingleby, T. (2016). Augmented reality with hololens: Experiential architectures embedded in the real world. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.04281
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. A. (2016). The future of three-dimensional thinking. Science, 353(6302), 876. doi:10.1126/science.aah5394
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T., & Montello, D. R. (2006). Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 93–129. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, J., & Hachet, M. (2015). Advances in interaction with 3D environments. Computer Graphics Forum, 34(1), 152–190. doi:10.1111/cgf.12466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmonik, C., Boone, T. B., & Khavari, R. (2017). Workflow for visualization of neuroimaging data with an augmented reality device. Journal of Digital Imaging, 1–6. doi:10.1007/s10278-017-9991-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keehner, M., Hegarty, M., Cohen, C., Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. (2008). Spatial reasoning with external visualizations: What matters is what you see, not whether you interact. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(7), 1099–1132. doi:10.1080/03640210801898177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knibbe, J., Schjerlund, J., Petraeus, M., & Hornbæk, K. (2018). The dream is collapsing. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/3173574.3174057
   Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 549–579. doi:10.1080/15326900701399897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krichenbauer, M., Yamamoto, G., Taketom, T., Sandor, C., & Kato, H. (2018). Augmented reality versus virtual reality for 3D object manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(2), 1038–1048. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2017.2658570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kun, A., van der Meulen, H., & Janssen, C. (2017). Calling while driving: An initial experiment with hololens. Proceeings of the international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design 2017, Manchester Village, VT, USA. Retrieved from http://drivingassessment.uiowa.edu/sites/default/files/DA2017/papers/32_AndrewKun_CallingWhileDriving_VersionA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lages, W. S., & Bowman, D. A. (2018). Move the object or move myself? walking vs. manipulation for the examination of 3D scientific data. Frontiers in ICT, 5, 15. doi:10.3389/fict.2018.00015
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. U., & Tversky, B. (2005). Interplay between visual and spatial: The effect of landmark descriptions on comprehension of route/survey spatial descriptions. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(2–3), 163–185. doi:10.1207/s15427633scc052&3_4
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1982). Cognitive styles in the use of spatial direction terms. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 251–268). Chichester, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, C., & Labov, W. (1975). Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language, 51(4), 924–939. doi:10.2307/412701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., & Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Human navigation by path integration. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 125–151). Baltimore, MD, US: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marzo, A., Bossavit, B., & Hachet, M. (2014). Combining multi-touch input and device movement for 3D manipulations in mobile augmented reality environments. Proceedings of the SUI 2014 symposium on spatial user interaction, Honolulu, HI, USA: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2659766.2659775
   Google Scholar
• McGahan, M. (2014). Perspective switching in virtual environments. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. 127, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mechdyne Corporation. (2016). CAVE virtual reality. Retrieved January 7, 2016, from http://www.mechdyne.com/hardware.aspx?name=CAVE
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, D., Caputo, F. M., Giachetti, A., Ferreira, A., & Jorge, J. (2018). A survey on 3D virtual object manipulation: From the desktop to immersive virtual environments. Computer Graphics Forum. doi:10.1111/cgf.13390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microsoft. (2016). Microsoft HoloLens. Retrieved January 7, 2016, from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems, E77–D(12). Retrieved from citeulike-article-id:477597
   Google Scholar
• Moffat, S. D., Hampson, E., & Hatzipantelis, M. (1998). Navigation in a “virtual” maze: Sex differences and correlation with psychometric measures of spatial ability in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(2), 73–87. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(97)00104-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (1993). Scale and multiple psychologies of space. Proceedings of the COSIT 1999 conference on spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS, Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (1998). A new framework for understanding the acquisition of spatial knowledge in large-scale environments. In M. J. Egenhofer & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Spatial and temporal reasoning in geographic information systems (pp. 143–154). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (Vol. 18, pp. 257–294). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. M. (2012). US army land navigation in the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA563009
   Google Scholar
• Mountain, D., & Liarokapis, F. (2005). Interacting with virtual reality scenes on mobile devices. Proceedings of the MobileHCI 2005 international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices & services, New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1085777.1085851
   Google Scholar
• Münzer, S., & Hölscher, C. (2011). Entwicklung und validierung eines fragebogens zu räumlichen strategien. Diagnostica, 57(3), 111–125. doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neis, P., & Zielstra, D. (2014). Recent developments and future trends in volunteered geographic information research: The case of openStreetMap. Future Internet, 6(1), 76–106. doi:10.3390/fi6010076
   Google Scholar
• Nex, F., & Remondino, F. (2014). UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review. Applied Geomatics, 6(1), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x
   Google Scholar
• Nurminen, A. (2008). Mobile 3D city maps. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28(4), 20–31. doi:10.1109/MCG.2008.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurminen, A., & Oulasvirta, A. (2008). Designing interactions for navigation in 3D mobile maps. In Map-based mobile services (pp. 198–227), Eds. L. Meng, A. Zipf, & S. Winter. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-37110-6_10
   Google Scholar
• Ong, S. (2017). Beginning windows mixed reality programming. Berkeley, CA: Apress. doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-2769-5
   Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, A., Estlander, S., & Nurminen, A. (2009). Embodied interaction with a 3D versus 2D mobile map. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(4), 303–320. doi:10.1007/s00779-008-0209-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passini, R. (1984). Spatial representations, a wayfinding perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(2), 153–164. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80031-6
   Google Scholar
• Pazzaglia, F., & De Beni, R. (2001). Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 493–508. doi:10.1080/09541440042000124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrig, W., & Kintsch, W. (1985). Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 503–518. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakkolainen, I., & Vainio, T. (2001). A 3D City Info for mobile users. Computers & Graphics, 25(4), 619–625. doi:10.1016/S0097-8493(01)00090-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. E., & Collaer, M. L. (2011). Virtual navigation performance: The relationship to field of view and prior video gaming experience. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112(2), 477–498. doi:10.2466/22.24.PMS.112.2.477-498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27(4), 741–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. E., Powers, M. E., & Bousquet, L. G. (2011). Video game experience predicts virtual, but not real navigation performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 552–560. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. (1999). The effects of maps on navigation and search strategies in very-large-scale virtual environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5(1), 54–75. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.5.1.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz, M., Baigelenov, A., Hung, Y.-H., & Parsons, P. (2017). Reexamining the cognitive utility of 3D visualizations using augmented reality holograms. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE VIS Workshop on Immersive Analytics: Exploring Future Visualization and Interaction Technologies for Data Analytics. Phoenix, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Sala, G., Tatlidil, K. S., & Gobet, F. (2018). Video game training does not enhance cognitive ability: A comprehensive meta-analytic investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2), 111–139. doi:10.1037/bul0000139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarfe, P., & Glennerster, A. (2015). Using high-fidelity virtual reality to study perception in freely moving observers. Journal of Vision, 15(9), 3. doi:10.1167/15.9.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, K. (1991). The contribution of solution strategy to spatial performance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(4), 474–491. doi:10.1037/h0084301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, A. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004). Neural correlates of individual differences in spatial learning strategies. Neuropsychology, 18(3), 442–449. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, B., & Hedley, N. (2004). Exploring a cognitive basis for learning spatial relationships with augmented reality. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1(4). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/itls_facpub/92
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703. doi:10.1126/science.171.3972.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, I. D. (2008). Travails in the third dimension: A critical evaluation of three-dimensional geographical visualization. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby, & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization: Concepts, tools and applications (pp. 199–222). Chichester, England, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shovman, M., Bown, J., Szymkowiak, A., & Scott-Brown, K. C. (2015). Twist and learn. Proceedings of the CHI 2015 conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702201
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, M., Zhao, J., & Klippel, A. (2017). Take a walk: Evaluating movement types for data visualization in immersive virtual reality. IEEE VIZ. Phoenix, AZ. Retrieved from http://www.aviz.fr/~bbach/immersive2017/papers/IA_1946-paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smallman, H. S., & John, M. S. (2005). Naive realism: Misplaced faith in realistic displays. Ergonomics in Design: the Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 13(3), 6–13. doi:10.1177/106480460501300303
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, R. P., Russell, S. M., & Rosenberg, E. S. (2017). The mixed reality of things: Emerging challenges for human-information interaction. In T. P. Hanratty & J. Llinas (Eds.), International society for optics and photonics (Vol. 10207, pp. 102070A), SPIE, Bellingham, WA, USA. doi: 10.1117/12.2268004
   Google Scholar
• Špriňarová, K., Juřík, V., Šašinka, Č., Herman, L., Štěrba, Z., Stachoň, Z., … Kozlíková, B. (2015). Human-computer interaction in real-3D and Pseudo-3D cartographic visualization: A comparative study. In C. Robbi Sluter, C. B. Madureira Cruz, & P. M. de Menezes (Eds.), Cartography - maps connecting the world: 27th international cartographic conference 2015 - ICC2015 (pp. 59–73). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_5
   Google Scholar
• Stannus, S., Lucieer, A., & Fu, W.-T. (2014). Natural 7DoF navigation & interaction in 3D geovisualisations. Proceedings of the VRST 2014 symposium on virtual reality software and technology. New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2671015.2671131
   Google Scholar
• Steinicke, F., Benko, H., Krüger, A., Keefe, D., de la Riviére, J.-B., Anderson, K., … Pakanen, M. (2012). The 3rd dimension of CHI (3DCHI). Proceedings of the CHI EA 2012 annual conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing, New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2212776.2212698
   Google Scholar
• Stoakley, R., Conway, M. J., & Pausch, R. (1995). Virtual reality on a WIM. Proceedings of the SIGCHI 1995 conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/223904.223938
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. A., Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, S. T. (2008). Spatial mental representation: Implications for navigation system design. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 4(1), 1–40. doi:10.1518/155723408X342835
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. A., Naylor, S. J., & Chechile, N. A. (1999). Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective. Memory & Cognition, 27(2), 309–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 560–589. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90019-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vovk, A., Wild, F., Guest, W., & Kuula, T. (2018). Simulator sickness in augmented reality training using the microsoft hololens. Proceedings of the CHI 2018 Conference on Human Factors in Computing, New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/3173574.3173783
   Google Scholar
• Wiehr, F., Daiber, F., Kosmalla, F., & Krüger, A. (2017). ARTopos. Proceedings of the UbiComp 2017 international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing and international symposium on wearable computers, New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/3123024.3124446
   Google Scholar
• Wilkening, J., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2013). How users interact with a 3D geo-browser under time pressure. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(1), 40–52. doi:10.1080/15230406.2013.762140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Mires, J., Tversky, B., & Hazeltine, E. (2000). Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(4), 315–332. doi:10.1023/A:1015584100204
   Google Scholar