Eudaimonia and Hedonia in the Design and Evaluation of a Cooperative Game for Psychosocial Well-Being

References

• Aarhus, R., Grönvall, E., Larsen, S. B., & Wollsen, S. (2011). Turning training into play: Embodied gaming, seniors, physical training and motivation. Gerontechnology : International Journal on the Fundamental Aspects of Technology to Serve the Ageing Society, 10, 2. doi:10.4017/gt.2011.10.2.005.00
   Google Scholar
• Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-centered design. In W. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. pp. 763–767. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Abt, C. C. (1970). Serious games. New York, NY: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2013). Understanding the role of body movement in player engagement. Human–Computer Interaction, 28(1), 40–75. doi:10.1080/07370024.2012.688468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boletsis, C., & McCallum, S. (2016). Augmented reality cubes for cognitive gaming: Preliminary usability and game experience testing. International Journal of Serious Games, 3(1), 3–18. doi:10.17083/ijsg.v3i1.106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brederode, B., Markopoulos, P., Gielen, M., Vermeeren, A., & de Ridder, H. (2005). pOwerball: The design of a novel mixed-reality game for children with mixed abilities. Proceedings of the IDC 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 32–39), New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmyer, J. H., Fox, C. M., Curtiss, K. A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K. M., & Pidruzny, J. N. (2009). The development of the game engagement questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 624–634. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brühlmann, F., & Schmid, G.-M. (2015). How to measure the game experience?: Analysis of the factor structure of two questionnaires. Proceedings of the CHI EA 2015 Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1181–1186), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2702613.2732831
   Google Scholar
• Bujacz, A., Vittersø, J., Huta, V., & Kaczmarek, L. D. (2014). Measuring hedonia and eudaimonia as motives for activities: Cross-national investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calleja, G. (2010). Digital games and escapism. Games and Culture, 5(4), 335–353. doi:10.1177/1555412009360412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, R. A., & Peters, D. (2014). Positive computing: Technology for wellbeing and human potential. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M. (2001). Community computing as human-computer interaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(5), 307–314. doi:10.1080/01449290110078941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M. (2004). Beyond fun. Interactions, 11(5), 38–40. doi:10.1145/1015530
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, E. F., Snowdon, D. N., & Munro, A. J. (Eds.). (2001). Collaborative virtual environments: Digital places and spaces for interaction. London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P. J., Coleman, R., Keates, S., & Lebbon, C. (2013). Inclusive design: Design for the whole population. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Clason, D. L., & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35, 4. doi:10.5032/jae.1994.04031
   Google Scholar
• Cota, T. T., Ishitani, L., & Vieira, N. (2015). Mobile game design for the elderly: A study with focus on the motivation to play. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 96–105. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuzzort, S., & Starner, T. (2008). AstroWheelie: A wheelchair based exercise game. The Proceedings of the ISWC 2008 International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 113–114), Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• De Kort, Y. A. W., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2008). People, places, and play: Player experience in a socio-spatial context. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 6(2), 18. doi:10.1145/1371216.1371221
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter, B., & Vanden Abeele, V. (2010). Designing meaningful play within the psycho-social context of older adults. Proceedings of the FnG 2010 Conference on Fun and Games (pp. 84–93), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1823818.1823827
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P., & Hassenzahl, M. (2012). Towards happiness: Possibility-driven design. Editors: Marielba ZacariasJosé Valente de Oliveira. In Human-computer interaction: The agency perspective (Vol. 396, pp.3–27). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, S. (2014). Eudaimonic design, or: Six invitations to rethink gamification. In M. Fuchs, S. Fizek, P. Ruffino, & N. Schrape (Eds.), Rethinking gamification (pp. 305–331). Lüneburg, Germany: Meson Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, S., Kolb, N., & Hassenzahl, M. (2014). The “hedonic” in human-computer interaction: History, contributions, and future research directions. Proceedings of the DIS 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 305–314), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2598510.2598549
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edey, J., Seaborn, K., Branje, C., & Fels, D. I. (2014). Powered to Play: A mixed reality game for people driving powered chairs. Proceedings of the GEM 2014 Conference on Games, Entertainment, and Media (pp. 1–8), Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/GEM.2014.7048101
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Panadero, C., de la Cruz Barquero, V., Delgado Kloos, C., & Moran Núñez, D. (2014). PhyMEL-WS: Physically experiencing the virtual world. Insights into mixed reality and flow state on board a wheelchair simulator. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(12), 1629–1648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorilli, G., Iuliano, E., Aquino, G., Battaglia, C., Giombini, A., Calcagno, G., & Di Cagno, A. (2013). Mental health and social participation skills of wheelchair basketball players: A controlled study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(11), 3679–3685. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, A., Burns, M. K., & Bottsford-Miller, N. A. (2007). Meta-analysis of disability simulation research. Remedial and Special Education, 28(2), 72–79. doi:10.1177/07419325070280020601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajadhar, B. J., Nap, H. H., de Kort, Y. A. W., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2010). Out of sight, out of mind: Co-player effects on seniors’ player experience. Proceedings of the FnG 2010 Conference on Fun and Games (pp. 74–83), New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gamberini, L., Martino, F., Seraglia, B., Spagnolli, A., Fabregat, M., Ibanez, F., … Andrés, J. M. (2009). Eldergames project: An innovative mixed reality table-top solution to preserve cognitive functions in elderly people. Proceedings of the HSI 2009 Conference on Human System Interactions (pp. 164–169), Catania, Italy, doi: 10.1109/HSI.2009.5090973
   Google Scholar
• Gell, N. M., Wallace, R. B., Lacroix, A. Z., Mroz, T. M., & Patel, K. V. (2015). Mobility device use in older adults and incidence of falls and worry about falling: Findings from the 2011–2012 National health and aging trends study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 63(5), 853–859. doi:10.1111/jgs.13393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerling, K. M., Kalyn, M. R., & Mandryk, R. L. (2013). KINECTwheels: Wheelchair-accessible motion-based game interaction. Proceedings of CHI EA 2013 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3055–3058), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2468356.2479609
   Google Scholar
• Gerling, K. M., & Mandryk, R. L. (2014). Designing video games for older adults and caregivers. Proceedings the MP 2014 Meaningful Play Conference, Pittsburg, PA: ETC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerling, K. M., Mandryk, R. L., Birk, M. V., Miller, M., & Orji, R. (2014). The effects of embodied persuasive games on player attitudes toward people using wheelchairs. Proceedings of the CHI 2014 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3413–3422), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2556288.2556962
   Google Scholar
• Gerling, K. M., Mandryk, R. L., & Kalyn, M. R. (2013). Wheelchair-based game design for older adults. Proceedings of the SIGACCESS 2013 Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 27: 1–27:8), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2513383.2513436
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Pepe, A. A., & Murphy, L. L. (2005). Hedonomics: The power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics. Ergonomics in Design, 13(1), 8–14. doi:10.1177/106480460501300104
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2008). User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. Proceedings of the AFIHM 2008 Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine (pp. 11–15), New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. W., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 196–221. doi:10.5502/ijw.v2i3.3
   Google Scholar
• Huta, V. (2016). Eudaimonic and hedonic orientations: Theoretical considerations and research findings. In J. Vittersø (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 215–231). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2013). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425–1456. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutzler, Y., Chacham-Guber, A., & Reiter, S. (2013). Psychosocial effects of reverse-integrated basketball activity compared to separate and no physical activity in young people with physical disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 579–587. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., Li, K. J., Janissa, N. S., Gladys, W. L. C., & Lee, K. M. (2009). Games for a better life: Effects of playing Wii games on the well-being of seniors in a long-term care facility. Proceedings of the IE 2009 Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment (pp. 5: 1–5:6), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1746050.1746055
   Google Scholar
• Kahlbaugh, P. E., Sperandio, A. J., Carlson, A. L., & Hauselt, J. (2011). Effects of Playing Wii on well-being in the elderly: Physical activity, loneliness, and mood. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 35(4), 331–344. doi:10.1080/01924788.2011.625218
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. Well-Being: the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, 3, 25.
   Google Scholar
• Kamp, I., & Desmet, P. (2014). Measuring product happiness. Proceedings of the CHI EA 2014 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2509–2514), New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, S. K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E. (2009). Freedom to roam: A study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. Proceedings of the SIGACCESS 2009 Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 115–122), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1639642.1639663
   Google Scholar
• Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140. doi:10.2307/2787065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, C. L. M., & Lopez, S. J. (2002). Toward a science of mental health: Positive directions in diagnosis and interventions. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 45–59). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, E. T., Cheok, A. D., Nguyen, T. H. D., & Pan, Z. (2008). Age invaders: Social and physical inter-generational mixed reality family entertainment. Virtual Reality, 12(1), 3–16. doi:10.1007/s10055-008-0083-0
   Google Scholar
• Khoo, E. T., Lee, S. P., Cheok, A. D., Kodagoda, S., Zhou, Y., & Toh, G. S. (2006). Age invaders: Social and physical inter-generational family entertainment. Proceedings of the CHI EA 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 243–246), New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, R. L., Dupuis, D. J., MacPhee, A. H., Coolen, A. L., Smith, C., Best, K. L., … Bonaparte, J. P. (2004). The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): Measurement properties. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(5), 794–804. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumano, M. (2018). On the concept of well-being in Japan: Feeling shiawase as hedonic well-being and feeling ikigai as eudaimonic well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13(2), 419–433. doi:10.1007/s11482-017-9532-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzon, W. M., Jr, Urbanchek, M. G., & McCabe, S. (1996). The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 37(3), 265–272. doi:10.1097/00000637-199609000-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. A., & Loewenthal, K. (2015). An introduction to psychological tests and scales. London, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155. doi:10.1023/A:1006824100041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W. (1980). What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. Proceedings of the SIGSMALL 1980 Symposium on Small Systems (pp. 162–169), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/800088.802839
   Google Scholar
• Márquez Segura, E., Waern, A., Moen, J., & Johansson, C. (2013). The design space of body games: Technological, physical, and social design. Proceedings of the CHI 2013 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3365–3374), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2470654.2466461
   Google Scholar
• McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• McGonigal, J. (2015). Super Better: A revolutionary approach to getting stronger, happier, braver, and more resilient. Toronto, ON: Penguin Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mekler, E. D., & Hornbæk, K. (2016). Momentary pleasure or lasting meaning? Distinguishing eudaimonic and hedonic user experiences. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4509–4520), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858225
   Google Scholar
• Mollenkpopf, H., Hieber, A., & Wahl, H.-W. (2011). Continuity and change in older adults’ perceptions of out-of-home mobility over ten years: A qualitative–quantitative approach. Ageing and Society, 31(5), 782–802. doi:10.1017/S0144686X10000644
   Google Scholar
• Naftali, M., & Findlater, L. (2014). Accessibility in context: Understanding the truly mobile experience of smartphone users with motor impairments. Proceedings of the SIGACCESS 2014 Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 209–216), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2661334.2661372
   Google Scholar
• Nario-Redmond, M. R., Gospodinov, D., & Cobb, A. (2017). Crip for a day: The unintended negative consequences of disability simulations. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(3), 1–10. doi:10.1037/rep0000127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxley, J., & Whelan, M. (2008). It cannot be all about safety: The benefits of prolonged mobility. Traffic Injury Prevention, 9(4), 367–378. doi:10.1080/15389580801895285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 797. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2014). Older adults and technology use (Internet & Tech No. 202.419.4500) (p. 26). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-technology-use/
   Google Scholar
• Pohlmeyer, A. E. (2013). Positive Design: New challenges, opportunities, and responsibilities for design. In Design, user experience, and usability: User experience in novel technological environments (Vol. 8014, pp.540–547). Editor: Aaron Marcus, Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. J., & Green, A. M. (2010). The attitudes to disability scale (ADS): Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(9), 860–874. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01317.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154. doi:10.1037/a0019440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, M., Tan, W. P., Ong, J., Yau, L. J., Wan, M., & Ng, J. (2013). The dynamics of younger and older adult’s paired behavior when playing an interactive silhouette game. Proceedings of the CHI 2013 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1081–1090), New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2470654.2466138
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, D., Reinecke, L., Frischlich, L., & Bente, G. (2014). Media entertainment and well-being—Linking hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experience to media-induced recovery and vitality. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 456–478. doi:10.1111/jcom.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva, G., Banos, R. M., Botella, C., Wiederhold, B. K., & Gaggioli, A. (2012). Positive technology: Using interactive technologies to promote positive functioning. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 69–77. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D., Depp, C. A., Vahia, I. V., Reichstadt, J., Palmer, B. W., Kerr, J., … Jeste, D. V. (2010). Exergames for subsyndromal depression in older adults: A pilot study of a novel intervention. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(3), 221–226. doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c534b5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 139–170. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344–360. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K., Edey, J., Dolinar, G., Whitfield, M., Gardner, P., Branje, C., & Fels, D. I. (2016). Accessible play in everyday spaces: Mixed reality gaming for adult powered chair users. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 23(2), Article 12. doi:10.1145/2893182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K., Fels, D. I., & Pennefather, P. (2015a). A cooperative game for older powered chair users and their friends and family. Proceedings of the GEM 2015 Conference on Games, Entertainment, Media (pp. 52–55), Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/GEM.2015.7377242
   Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K., Fels, D. I., & Pennefather, P. (2015b). Eudaimonia in human factors research and practice: Foundations and conceptual framework applied to older adult populations. Proceedings of the ICT4AgeingWell 2015 Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (pp. 313–318), Setúbal, Portugal: SCITEPRESS. doi: 10.5220/0005473003130318
   Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K., Fels, D. I., & Pennefather, P. (2016). “Learn what we’re going through”: Attitudes of older powered chair users towards mixed reality games that involve power mobility. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(4), 699–711. doi:10.1007/s10209-015-0450-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K., Satoh, Y., & Fels, D. I. (2016). Usability and safety of a head-up display during powered chair navigation: A pilot study. Proceedings of the UAHCI 2016 Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (Vol.9739, pp. 628–638), Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40238-3_60
   Google Scholar
• Segura, E. M., & Isbister, K. (2015). Enabling co-located physical social play: A framework for design and evaluation. Editor: Regina Bernhaupt. In Game user experience evaluation (pp. 209–238). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15985-0_10
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, C., & Williams, D. (2011). Unpacking time online: Connecting Internet and massively multiplayer online game use with psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 38(1), 123–149. doi:10.1177/0093650210377196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susi, T., Johannesson, M., & Backlund, P. (2007). Serious games – An overview (Technical Report No. HS-IKI-TR-07-001). Skövde, Sweden: University of Skövde.
   Google Scholar
• Thieme, A., Balaam, M., Wallace, J., Coyle, D., & Lindley, S. (2012). Designing wellbeing. Proceedings of the DIS 2012 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 789–790), New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Varkey, P., Chutka, D. S., & Lesnick, T. G. (2006). The aging game: Improving medical students’ attitudes toward caring for the elderly. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 7(4), 224–229. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2005.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Hofer, M., & Schramm, H. (2012). Beyond pleasure: exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 406–428. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1997). Measuring quality of life: The World Health Organization quality of life instruments. World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 772–775. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zondervan, D. K., Secoli, R., Darling, A. M., Farris, J., Furumasu, J., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2015). Design and evaluation of the kinect-wheelchair interface controlled (KWIC) smart wheelchair for pediatric powered mobility training. Assistive Technology, 27(3), 183–192. doi:10.1080/10400435.2015.1012607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar