Collaboration on large interactive displays: a systematic review

Referencess

• Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2012). Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: A dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 15–26. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso Jaco, A., Buisine, S., Barré, J., Aoussat, A., & Vernier, F. (2013). Trains of thought on the tabletop: Visualizing association of ideas improves creativity. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(5), 1159–1167. doi:10.1007/s00779-013-0726-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardito, C., Buono, P., Costabile, M. F., & Desolda, G. (2015). Interaction with large displays: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 47(3), 46:1–46:38. doi:10.1145/2682623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachour, K., Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2010). An interactive table for supporting participation balance in face-to-face collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(3), 203–213. doi:10.1109/TLT.2010.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bause, I. M., Brich, I. R., Wesslein, A.-K., & Hesse, F. W. (2018). Using technological functions on a multi-touch table and their affordances to counteract biases and foster collaborative problem solving. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(1), 7–33. doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9271-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beheshti, E., Kim, D., Ecanow, G., & Horn, M. S. (2017). Looking inside the wires: Understanding museum visitor learning with an augmented circuit exhibit. Proceedings of the CHI 2017 conference on human factors in computing systems, 1583–1594. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bellucci, A., Malizia, A., & Aedo, I. (2014). Light on horizontal interactive surfaces: Input space for tabletop computing. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(3), 32:1–32:42. doi:10.1145/2500467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Buisine, S., Besacier, G., Aoussat, A., & Vernier, F. (2012). How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 49–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H., & Chiu, C.-H. (2016a). Collaboration scripts for enhancing metacognitive self-regulation and mathematics literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 263–280. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9681-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H., & Chiu, C.-H. (2016b). Employing intergroup competition in multitouch design-based learning to foster student engagement, learning achievement, and creativity. Computers & Education, 103, 99–113. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 13(1991), 127–149.
   Google Scholar
• Clayphan, A., Collins, A., Ackad, C., Kummerfeld, B., & Kay, J. (2011). Firestorm: A brainstorming application for collaborative group work at tabletops. Proceedings of the ITS 2011 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, 162–171. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Clayphan, A., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Tomitsch, M., Atkinson, S., & Kay, J. (2016). An in-the-wild study of learning to brainstorm: Comparing cards, tabletops and wall displays in the classroom. Interacting with Computers, 28(6), 788–810. doi:10.1093/iwc/iww001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, D. A., & West, C. P. (2012). Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: A stepwise approach. Medical Education, 46(10), 943–952. doi:10.1111/med.2012.46.issue-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53. doi:10.1037/a0017328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (2015). Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 9(1), 4–32. doi:10.1177/1555343415572631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, S. M., & Wiltshire, T. J. (2016). Technology as teammate: Examining the role of external cognition in support of team cognitive processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1531. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2011). Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1103–1113. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2004). The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In E. Salas, S. M. Fiore, & J. A. Cannon-Bowers (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance, 177-201, Washington, DC: APA Books.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Mercier, E., Burd, E., & Hatch, A. (2011). Multi-touch tables and the relationship with collaborative classroom pedagogies: A synthetic review. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 515–538. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9131-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Mercier, E., Burd, L., & Joyce-Gibbons, A. (2012). Multi-touch tables and collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1041–1054. doi:10.1111/bjet.2012.43.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homaeian, L., Goyal, N., Wallace, J. R., & Scott, S. D. (2018). Group vs individual: Impact of TOUCH and TILT cross-device interactions on mixed-focus collaboration. In Proceedings of the CHI 2018 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 73:1–73:13. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., & Rogers, Y. (2007). From entry to access: How shareability comes about. Proceedings of the DPPPI 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, W.-Y., Shadiev, R., Tseng, C.-W., & Huang, Y.-M. (2015). Exploring effects of multi-touch tabletop on collaborative fraction learning and the relationship of learning behavior and interaction with learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 459–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, W.-Y.-Y., & Su, J.-H.-H. (2012). The study of surface computer supported cooperative work and its design, efficiency, and challenges. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(2), 177–198. doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.554844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. R., & Hornbaek, K. (2016). Negotiating for space?: Collaborative work using a wall display with mouse and touch input. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 conference on human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jetter, H.-C., Gerken, J., Zoellner, M., Reiterer, H., & Milic-Frayling, N. (2011). Materializing the query with facet-streams: A hybrid surface for collaborative search on tabletops. Proceedings of the SIGCHI 2011 conference on human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kayes, A., Kayes, D., & Kolb, D. (2005). Experiential learning in teams. Simulation Gaming, 36, 330–354. doi:10.1177/1046878105279012
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–655. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R. (2003). Applying social psychological theory to the problems of group work. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI models, theories and frameworks: Toward a multi-disciplinary science (pp. 325–356). New York, NY: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Chapuis, O., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., & Lecolinet, E. (2016). Shared inter-action on a wall-sized display in a data manipulation task. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 conference on human factors in computing systems, 2075–2086. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Qin, Y., Yang, Q., Yu, C., & Shi, Y. (2015). A tabletop-centric smart space for emergency response. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 14(2), 32–40. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2015.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-SanJose, J. F., Juan, M. C., Segui, I., & Garcia-Garcia, I. (2015). The effects of computer-based games and collaboration in large groups vs. collaboration in pairs or traditional methods. Computers & Education, 87, 42–54. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., Gruenfeld, D. H., Hollingshead, A. B., & O’Connor, K. M. (1993). Groups, tasks, and technology: The effects of experience and change. Small Group Research, 24(3), 406–420. doi:10.1177/1046496493243007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2002). A learner-centred approach to developing team skills through web-based learning and assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 571–582. doi:10.1111/bjet.2002.33.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, E. M., & Higgins, S. (2014). Creating joint representations of collaborative problem solving with multi-touch technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(6), 497–510. doi:10.1111/jcal.2014.30.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, E. M., Higgins, S. E., & Joyce-Gibbons, A. (2016). The effects of room design on computer-supported collaborative learning in a multi-touch classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 504–522. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.881392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. R., Paepcke, A., Winograd, T., & Stamberger, J. (2006). Teamtag: Exploring centralized versus replicated controls for co-located tabletop group-ware. Proceedings of the SIGCHI 2006 conference on human factors in computing systems. 1273–1282. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller-Tomfelde, C. (2012). Interacting with mouse and touch devices on horizontal interactive displays. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11(3, SI), 285–294. doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0238-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Tomfelde, & Fjeld, M. (2010). Introduction: A short history of tabletop research, technologies, and products. In C. Müller- Tomfelde (Ed.), Tabletops - horizontal interactive displays, 1–24. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaumer, P., Matter, I., & Schwabe, G. (2012). “Enforced” vs. “Casual” Transparency – Findings from IT-supported advisory encounters. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 3(2), 11:1–11:19.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, K., Perry, M., Churchill, E., & Russell, D. (2003). Introduction to public and situated displays. In K. O’Hara, M. Perry, E. Churchill, & D. Russell (Eds.), Public and situated displays: Social and interactional aspects of shared display technologies, xvii–xxxiv. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. L. (1989). The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Systems, 5(2), 197–216. doi:10.1016/0167-9236(89)90007-9
   Google Scholar
• Piper, A. M., & Hollan, J. D. (2009). Tabletop displays for small group study: Affordances of paper and digital materials. Proceedings of the SIGCHI 2009 conference on human factors in computing systems,1227–1236. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., Lim, Y., Hazlewood, W. R., & Marshall, P. (2009). Equal opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single-user displays. Human Computer Interaction, 24, 79–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: Which way is best? Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1133–1152. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2004.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors, 50(3), 540–547. doi:10.1518/001872008X288457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, L., Buisine, S., Chaboissier, J., Aoussat, A., & Vernier, F. (2012). Dynamic tabletop interfaces for increasing creativity. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1892–1901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., & Blikstein, P. (2018). Tangible user interfaces and contrasting cases as a preparation for future learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(4), 369–384. doi:10.1007/s10956-018-9730-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Strait, M., Muller, L., Elfenbein, S., Shaer, O., & Shen, C. (2012). Phylo-genie: Engaging students in collaborative ’tree-thinking’ through tabletop techniques. Proceedings of the SIGCHI 2012 conference on human factors in computing systems, 3071–3080. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. D., Grant, K. D., & Mandryk, R. L. (2003). System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. Proceedings of the ECSCW 2003 conference on european conference on computer supported cooperative work, 159–178. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., Huang, Y. M., & Yang, Y.-S. (2015). Study of using a multi-touch tabletop technology to facilitate collaboration, interaction, and awareness in co-located environment. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(10), 952–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaer, O., Strait, M., Valdes, C., Feng, T., Lintz, M., & Wang, H. (2011). Enhancing genomic learning through tabletop interaction. Proceedings of the SIGCHI 2011 conference on human factors in computing systems, 2817–2826. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Shaer, O., Strait, M., Valdes, C., Wang, H., Feng, T., Lintz, M., & Liu, S. (2012). The design, development, and deployment of a tabletop interface for collaborative exploration of genomic data. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 70(10), 746–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, S. G. (1999). Testing a typology of tasks: An empirical validation of McGrath’s (1984) group task circumplex. Small Group Research, 30(2), 166–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, A., Tory, M., Po, B., Neumann, P., & Carpendale, S. (2006). Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays. Proceedings of the SIGCHI 2006 conference on human factors in computing systems, 1181–1190. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Tuddenham, P., Davies, I., & Robinson, P. (2009). WebSurface: An interface for co-located collaborative information gathering. Proceedings of the ITS 2009 international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. R., Scott, S. D., & MacGregor, C. G. (2013). Collaborative sensemaking on a digital tabletop and personal tablets: Prioritization, comparisons, and tableaux. Proceedings of the SIGCHI 2013 conference on human factors in computing systems, 3345–3354. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozniak, P., Goyal, N., Kucharski, P., Lischke, L., Mayer, S., & Fjeld, M. (2016). Ramparts: Supporting sensemaking with spatially-aware mobile interactions. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 conference on human factors in computing systems, 2447–2460. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zagermann, J., Pfeil, U., Rädle, R., Jetter, H.-C., Klokmose, C., & Reiterer, H. (2016). When tablets meet tabletops: The effect of tabletop size on around- the-table collaboration with personal tablets. Proceedings of the CHI 2016 conference on human factors in computing systems, 5470–5481. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zancanaro, M., Stock, O., Eisikovits, Z., Koren, C., & Weiss, P. L. (2012). Co-narrating a conflict: An interactive tabletop to facilitate attitudinal shifts. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19(3), 24:1–24:30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar