Introduction to this special issue on unifying human computer interaction and artificial intelligence

References

• Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., … Zheng, X. (2015). TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. https://www.tensorflow.org/ (Software available from tensorflow.org)
   Google Scholar
• Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S., Bennett, P.N., Inkpen, K. and Teevan, J. (2019). Guidelines for human-ai interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, Glasgow, Scotland (pp. 1–13).
   Google Scholar
• Börner, K., Contractor, N., Falk-Krzesinski, H.J., Fiore, S.M., Hall, K.L., Keyton, J., Spring, B., Stokols, D., Trochim, W. and Uzzi, B. (2010). A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Science Translational Medicine, 2 (49), 49cm24. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chancellor, S., Baumer, E. P., & De Choudhury, M. (2019). Who is the” human” in human-centered machine learning: The case of predicting mental health from social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3 (CSCW), Austin, TX (pp. 1–32).
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, H.-F., Wang, R., Zhang, Z., O’Connell, F., Gray, T., Harper, F. M., & Zhu, H. (2019). Explaining decision-making algorithms through UI: Strategies to help non-expert stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, Glasgow, Scotland (pp. 1–12).
   Google Scholar
• Cui, H., Zhang, H., Ganger, G. R., Gibbons, P. B., & Xing, E. P. (2016). Geeps: Scalable deep learning on distributed GPUs with a GPU-specialized parameter server. In Proceedings of the eleventh european conference on computer systems, London, England (pp. 1–16).
   Google Scholar
• Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009). Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 248–255).
   Google Scholar
• Dove, G., Halskov, K., Forlizzi, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2017). Ux design innovation: Challenges for working with machine learning as a design material. In Proceedings of the 2017 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, Colorado USA (pp. 278–288).
   Google Scholar
• Ernala, S. K., Birnbaum, M. L., Candan, K. A., Rizvi, A. F., Sterling, W. A., Kane, J. M., & De Choudhury, M. (2019). Methodological gaps in predicting mental health states from social media: Triangulating diagnostic signals. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, Glasgow Scotland (pp. 1–16).
   Google Scholar
• Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen, A., Vuong, A., Karahalios, K., Hamilton, K. and Sandvig, C. (2015). I always assumed that i wasn’t really that close to [her]” reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual acm conference on human factors in computing systems Seoul, South Korea (pp. 153–162).
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., Dimond, J., Irani, L., Hirsch, T., Muller, M., & Bardzell, S. (2017). Social justice and design: Power and oppression in collaborative systems. In Companion of the 2017 acm conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, Portland, Oregon (pp. 117–122).
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. (2018). Data science as political action: Grounding data science in a politics of justice. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1811.03435. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03435
   Google Scholar
• Grudin, J. (2009). Ai and hci: Two fields divided by a common focus. Ai Magazine, 30(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v30i4.2271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, A. (2019). Serious safety lapses led to uber’s fatal self-driving crash, new documents suggest. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/6/20951385/ uber-self-driving-crash-death-reason-ntsb-dcouments.
   Google Scholar
• Ho¨ O¨, K. K. (2000). Steps to take before intelligent user interfaces become real. Interacting with Computers, 12(4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(99)00006-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvitz, E. (1999). Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (pp. 159–166).
   Google Scholar
• Inkpen, K., Chancellor, S., De Choudhury, M., Veale, M., & Baumer, E. P. (2019). Where is the human? bridging the gap between AI and HCI. In Extended abstracts of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, Glasgow, Scotland (pp. 1–9).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.K., Kusbit, D., Kahng, A., Kim, J.T., Yuan, X., Chan, A., See, D., Noothigattu, R., Lee, S., Psomas, A. and Procaccia, A.D. (2019). WeBuildAI: Participatory framework for algorithmic governance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3 (CSCW), Austin, TX (pp. 1–35).
   Google Scholar
• Li, -F.-F. (2018). How to make a.i. that’s good for people. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (1998). What is artificial intelligence? (Tech. Rep.). Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2014). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Diversion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1994). How might people interact with agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/176789.176796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L. and Desmaison, A (2019). Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. D. Alche´-Buc, E. Fox, & R. Garnett, Eds. Advances in neural information processing systems 32. 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc. http://papers.neurips.cc/paper/9015-pytorch-an-imperative-style-high-performance-deep-learning-library.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, M. K., Paul, J. M., & Brubaker, J. R. (2019). How computers see gender: An evaluation of gender classification in commercial facial analysis services. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3 (CSCW), Austin, TX (pp. 1–33).
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B., & Maes, P. (1997). Direct manipulation vs. interface agents. interactions, 4(6), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/267505.267514
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithms in our midst: Information, power and choice when software is everywhere. In Proceedings of the 18th acm conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Vancouver, Canada. (pp. 1918).
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, T. (2006). Shifting viewpoints: Artificial intelligence and human–computer interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 170(18), 1256–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2006.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. J., Miller, K., & Grodzinsky, F. S. (2017). Why we should have seen that coming: Comments on microsoft’s tay” experiment,” and wider implications. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 47(3), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3144592
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, A., Fox, S. E., Rousso-Schindler, S., & Warshaw, J. (2018). A qualitative exploration of perceptions of algorithmic fairness. In Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, Montréal, Canada (pp. 1–14).
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Yu, B., Halfaker, A., & Terveen, L. (2018). Value-sensitive algorithm design: Method, case study, and lessons. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), Jersey City, NJ (pp. 1–23).
   Google Scholar