The IBM natural conversation framework: a new paradigm for conversational UX design

References

• Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashktorab, Z., Jain, M., Liao, Q. V., & Weisz, J. D. (2019, May). Resilient chatbots: Repair strategy preferences for conversational breakdowns. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 4-9, 2019, Glasgow, UK (pp. 1–12). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Avula, S., Chadwick, G., Arguello, J., & Capra, R. (2018, March). Searchbots: User engagement with chatbots during collaborative search. In Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction & retrieval, March 11-15, 2018, New Brunswick, NJ (pp. 52–61). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M. M. (2015, June). NADIA: A simplified approach towards the development of natural dialogue systems. In International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems (pp. 144–150). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves, A. P., & Gerosa, M. A. (2021). How should my chatbot interact? A survey on social characteristics in human–chatbot interaction design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(8), 729–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, G. G. (2003). Natural language processing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 51–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370103
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, E. (2019, September-October). Scaling UX with design systems. Interactions, XXVI(5), 22. ACM, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/3352681
   Google Scholar
• Fast, E., Chen, B., Mendelsohn, J., Bassen, J., & Bernstein, M. S. (2018). Iris: A conversational agent for complex tasks. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 21-26, 2018, Monteal, Canada (pp. 1–12). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Frohlich, D. M., & Luff, P. (1990). Applying the technology of conversation to the technology for conversation. In P. Luff, G. N. Gilbert, & D. M. Frohlich (Eds.), Computers and conversation (pp. 187–220). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganhotra, J., Moore, R., Joshi, S., & Wadhawan, K. (2020). Effects of naturalistic variation in goal-oriented dialog. Findings of EMNLP 2020. https://org/arXiv:2010.02260
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Y. (2017). Neural network methods for natural language processing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 10(1), 1–309. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00762ED1V01Y201703HLT037
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, C., Georgila, K., Yanov, V., & Traum, D. (2021). Towards personalization of spoken dialogue system communication strategies. L. F. D‘Haro, Z. Callejas, & S. Nakamura (Eds.), Conversational dialogue systems for the next decade (pp. 145–160). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, A., Mohamed, A. R., & Hinton, G. (2013, May). Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, May 26-31, 2013, Vancover, Canada (pp. 6645–6649). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, D., Tang, D., Duan, N., Zhou, M., & Yin, J. (2018). Dialog-to-action: Conversational question answering over a large-scale knowledge base. In S. Bengio, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi, & R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 2942–2951). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S., & Athula, G. (2018, May). Extending a conventional chatbot knowledge base to external knowledge source and introducing user based sessions for diabetes education. In 2018 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), May 16-18, 2018, Krakow, Poland (pp. 698–703). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, M., Kota, R., Kumar, P., & Patel, S. N. (2018, April). Convey: Exploring the use of a context view for chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, April 21-26, 2018, Montreal, Canada (pp. 1–6).
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., Yin, F., Sun, Z., Li, X., Yuan, A., Chai, D., & Li, J. (2019). Entity-relation extraction as multi-turn question answering. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, July 28 - August 2, 2019, Florence, Italy (pp. 1340–1350). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1905.05529
   Google Scholar
• Liao, Q. V., Srivastava, B., & Kapanipathi, P. (2017). Tailoring conversational UX through the lens of dialogue complexity. In CHI Workshop on Conversational UX Design, Denver, CO, May 2017. ACM. https://s3.us.cloud-object-storage.appdomain.cloud/res-files/2763-Liao.pdf
   Google Scholar
• López-Cózar, R., Callejas, Z., Espejo, G., & Griol, D. (2011). Enhancement of conversational agents by means of multimodal interaction. In D. Perez-Marin, & I. Pascual-Nieto (Eds.), Conversational agents and natural language interaction: techniques and effective practices (pp. 223–252). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Maat, M. T., Truong, K. P., & Heylen, D. (2010, September). How turn-taking strategies influence users’ impressions of an agent. In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 441–453). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• McTear, M. F., Callejas, Z., & Griol, D. (2016). The conversational interface (Vol. 6). No. 94. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mitri, M. (2022). Story analysis using natural language processing and interactive dashboards. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(2), 216–226. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08874417.2020.1774442
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. J., Szymanski, M. H., Arar, R., & Ren, G.-J. (Eds.). (2018). Studies in conversational UX design. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. J., & Arar, R. (2019). Conversational UX design: A practitioner’s guide to the natural conversation framework. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304087
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. J., Young Liu, E., Mishra, S., & Ren, G.-J. (2020). Design systems for conversational UX. CUI ‘20: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, July 2020. No.: 45, (pp. 1–4). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406150
   Google Scholar
• Murad, C., Munteanu, C., Cowan, B. R., & Clark, L. (2021). Finding a new voice: Transitioning designers from GUI to VUI design. In CUI 2021 - 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI ’21), July27–29, 2021, Bilbao (online), Spain. ACM, New York, NY, US
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, T., Harris, I., & Sawa, Y. (2018, January). Detecting phishing attacks using natural language processing and machine learning. In 2018 IEEE 12th international conference on semantic computing (ICSC), January 31, 2018-February 02 2018, Laguna Hills, CA (pp. 300–301). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Porcheron, M., Reeves, S., Sharples, S., & Fischer, J. E. (2018). Voice interfaces in everyday life, In CHI’18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, ACM, (pp. Paper 640).
   Google Scholar
• Raudaskoski, P. (1990). Repair work in human– Computer interaction – A conversation analytic perspective. In P. Luff, N. Gilbert, & D. Frohlich (Eds.), Computers and conversation analysis (pp. 151–171). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, E., & Dale, R. (1997). Building applied natural language generation systems. Natural Language Engineering, 3(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324997001502
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas, (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York, NY: Irvington Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2307/2066919
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(5), 1295–1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216. https://doi.org/10.1086/230911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo97805117912084
   Google Scholar
• Silvervarg, A., & Jönsson, A. (2013, October). Iterative development and evaluation of a social conversational agent. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, October 14-18, 2013, Nagoya, Japan (pp. 1223–1229). Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing.
   Google Scholar
• Yankelovich, N., Levow, G. A., & Marx, M. (1995). Designing speech acts: Issues in speech user interfaces. In Proceedings of CHI ’95, May 7-11, 1995, Denver, CO, (pp. 369–376). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/223904.223952
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Gao, J. (2017). A comparative study to understanding about poetics based on natural language processing. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7(5), 229. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2017.75017
   Google Scholar