The influence of microstructure and polymorphic conformer on the shock sensitivity of 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazoctane (HMX)

References

• Asay, B. W., B. F. Henson, L. B. Smilowitz, and P. Dickson. 2003. On the difference in impact sensitivity of beta and delta HMX. Journal of Energetic Materials 21 (4):223–35. doi:10.1080/713770434.
   Google Scholar
• Baytos, J. F. 1980. LASL explosive property data, Vol. 4. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cady, H. H. 1962. Studies on the Polymorphs of HMX, Vol. 2652. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P. W.1996, Explosives engineering, John Wiley & Sons, 1996, see section 22.2.3: Thick- versus thin-pulse criteria & 22.2.4: Effects of impact shock diameter.
   Google Scholar
• Cummock, N., A. Casey, G. Montoya, and S. Son. 2019. Shock sensitivity of energetic materials—gathering additional information from the gap test. In SHOCK19, shock compression of condensed matter. 921 SW 6th Avenue, Portland, OR 97204 USA, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Cummock, N. R. 2020, HMX microstructural data of beta, delta, and beta- reversion, https://hdl.handle.net/11256/993, Accessed: 2021-03-21(2020).
   Google Scholar
• Cummock, N. R., J. R. Lawrence, M. Örnek, and S. F. Son. 2021. The influence of microstructure and conformational polymorph on the drop-weight impact sensitivity of δ-phase HMX. Journal of Energetic Materials 1–26. doi:10.1080/07370652.2021.1895915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, J., C. Chow, H. Chau, R. Hodgin, and R. Lee, A small-scale safety test for initiation components, Tech. rep., Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US) (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Czerski, H., M. Greenaway, W. Proud, and J. Field. 2004. β-δ phase transition during dropweight impact on cyclotetramethylene-tetranitroamine. Journal of Applied Physics 96 (8):4131–34. doi:10.1063/1.1790067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dattelbaum, D. M., S. A. Sheffield, D. B. Stahl, A. M. Dattelbaum, and R. Engelke, Influence of hot spot features on the initiation characteristics of het- erogeneous nitromethane, Tech. rep., Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States) (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Dick, J., Buildup to detonation in solid high explosives during plane shock initiation: Some comparisons, in: Symposium (International) on Combustion, Vol. 18, Elsevier, 1981, pp. 1623–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, J. 1983. Measurement of the shock initiation sensitivity of low density HMX. Combustion and Flame 54 (1–3):121–29. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(83)90026-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, J. 1987. Stress-time profiles in low density HMX. Combustion and Flame 69 (3):257–62. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(87)90119-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, J., and R. Engelke. 1980. Reproducibility of planewave transit times in three explosives during initiation: Comparison to wedge experiments. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 5 (5):139–44. doi:10.1002/prep.19800050505.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, M., W. Engel, and N. Eisenreich. 1992. Thermal expansion, transitions, sensitivities and burning rates of HMX. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 17 (4):190–95. doi:10.1002/prep.19920170409.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S., T. Liddiard Jr, and B. Drimmer, The shock-to-detonation transition in solid explosives, in: Symposium (International) on Combustion, Vol. 9, Elsevier, 1963, pp. 517–29.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., D. Holtkamp, P. Rigg, and D. Dolan. 2007. Accuracy limits and window corrections for photon Doppler velocimetry. Journal of Applied Physics 101 (1):013523. doi:10.1063/1.2407290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittell, D. E., N. R. Cummock, and S. F. Son. 2016. Reactive flow modeling of small scale detonation failure experiments for a baseline non-ideal explosive. Journal of Applied Physics 120 (6):064901. doi:10.1063/1.4959818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, S. P. 1980. LASL shock Hugoniot data, Vol. 5. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGlaun, J. M., S. Thompson, and M. Elrick. 1990. CTH: A three-dimensional shock wave physics code. International Journal of Impact Engineering 10 (1–4):351–60. doi:10.1016/0734-743X(90)90071-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P., K.-Y. Lee, D. Moore, R. Scharff, and G. Avilucea, The evolution of sensitivity in HMX-based explosives during the reversion from delta to beta phase, in: AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 955, AIP, 2007, pp. 987–90.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay, J., and A. Popolato, Analysis of shock wave and initiation data for solid explosives, in: Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium (International) on Detonation, 1965, pp. 233–38.
   Google Scholar
• Siviour, C. R., and J. L. Jordan. 2016. High strain rate mechanics of polymers: A review. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials 2 (1):15–32. doi:10.1007/s40870-016-0052-8.
   Google Scholar
• Smilowitz, L., B. Henson, B. Asay, and P. Dickson. 2002. The β–δ phase transition in the energetic nitramine-octahydro-1, 3, 5, 7-tetranitro-1, 3, 5, 7- tetrazocine: Kinetics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 117 (8):3789–98. doi:10.1063/1.1495399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urtiew, P. A., J. W. Forbes, C. M. Tarver, K. S. Vandersall, F. Garcia, D. W. Greenwood, P. C. Hsu, and J. L. Maienschein, Shock sensitivity of LX-04 containing delta phase HMX at elevated temperatures, in: AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 706, AIP, 2004, pp. 1053–56.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rossum, G., and F. L. Drake Jr. 1995. Python tutorial, Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica Amsterdam. The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen, P., R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, I. Polat, Y. Feng, E. W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henriksen, E. A. Quintero, C. R. Harris, A. M. Archibald, A. H. Ribeiro, F. Pe- dregosa, and P. van Mulbregt. 2020. SciPy 1.0 Contributors, SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods 17:261–72. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar