2,412
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Motivations of Traditional and Nontraditional College Students: From Self-Determination and Attributions, to Expectancy and Values

References

  • Allison, L. (1996). Social integration factors of nontraditional students. Michigan Community College Journal: Research & Practice, 2(1), 79–91.
  • Barron, K. E., & Hulleman, C. S. (2015). Expectancy-Value-Cost model of motivation. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 2nd edition (Vol. 8, pp. 503–509). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Bradley, J. S., & Graham, S. W. (2000). The effect of educational ethos and campus involvement on self-reported college outcomes for traditional and nontraditional undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 41(5), 488–502.
  • Bye, D., Pushkar, D., & Conway, M. (2007). Motivation, interest, and positive affect in traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(2), 141–158.
  • Carney-Crompton, S., & Tan, J. (2002). Support systems, psychological functioning, and academic performance of nontraditional female students. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(2), 140–154.
  • Chartrand, J. M. (1990). A causal analysis to predict the personal and academic adjustment of nontraditional students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 65–73.
  • Chartrand, J. M. (1992). An empirical test of a model of nontraditional student adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 193–202.
  • Chiang, E. S., Byrd, S. P., & Molin, A. J. (2011). Children's perceived cost for exercise: Application of an expectancy-value paradigm. Health Education & Behavior, 38(2), 143–149.
  • Cole, J. S., Bergin, D. A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2008). Predicting student achievement for low stakes tests with effort and task value. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 609–624.
  • Conley, A. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: Combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 32–47.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-Determination Theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. doi: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.3.262
  • Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3/4), 325.
  • Donaldson, J. F., & Graham, S. W. (1999). A model of college outcomes for adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(1), 24–40.
  • Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128.
  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
  • Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
  • Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Competence and motivation: Competence as the core of achievement motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.
  • Elliot, A., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3×2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632–648.
  • Elliott, J. C. (1990). Affect and mathematics achievement of nontraditional college students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 160–165. doi: 10.2307/749143
  • Eppler, M. A., Carsen-Plentl, C., & Harju, B. L. (2000). Achievement goals, failure attributions, and academic performance in nontraditional and traditional college students. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15(3), 353–372.
  • Eppler, M. A., & Harju, B. L. (1997). Achievement motivation goals in relation to academic performance in traditional and nontraditional college students. Research in Higher Education, 38(5), 557–573.
  • Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244.
  • Fragoso, A. (2013). The transition of mature students to higher education: Challenging traditional concepts? Studies in the Education of Adults, 45(1), 67–81.
  • Geiger, J. F., Weinstein, L., & Jones, C. S. (2004). Differences in meaning in life in students: The effect of nontraditional status and region of country. College Student Journal, 38(4), 569–572.
  • Graham, S., & Donaldson, J. (1999). Adult students’ academic and intellectual development in college. Adult Education Quarterly, 49(3), 147–161.
  • Hegarty, N. (2011). Adult learners as graduate students: Underlying motivation in completing graduate programs. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59(3), 146–151.
  • Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179.
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
  • Jacobson, R. R., & Harris, S. M. (2008). Does the type of campus influence self-regulated earning as measured by the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)? Education, 128(3), 412–431.
  • Jagacinski, C. M., & Strickland, O. J. (2000). Task and ego orientation: The role of goal orientations in anticipated affective reactions to achievement outcomes. Learning & Individual Differences, 12(2), 189–208.
  • Jameson, M. M., & Fusco, B. R. (2014). Math anxiety, math self-concept, and math self-efficacy in adult learners compared to traditional undergraduate students. Adult Education Quarterly, 64(4), 306–322.
  • Jenkins, R. (2012). The new “traditional student.” Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(8), 31–32.
  • Jinkens, R. C. (2009). Nontraditional students: Who are they? College Student Journal, 43(4), 979–987.
  • Johnson, M. L., Edwards, O. V., & Dai, T. (2014). Growth trajectories of task values and self-efficacy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 10–18. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2014.020102
  • Johnson, M. L., & Kestler, J. L. (2013). Achievement goals of traditional and nontraditional aged college students: Using the 3×2 achievement goal framework. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 48–59.
  • Johnson, M. L., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2012). Achievement goals and coping strategies: Identifying the traditional/nontraditional students who use them. Journal of College Student Development, 53, 41–54.
  • Johnson, M. L., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Use of task-value instructional inductions for facilitating engagement and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 51–63.
  • Johnson, M. L., & Sinatra, G. M. (2014). The influence of approach and avoidance goals on conceptual change. Journal of Educational Research, 107(4), 313–325.
  • Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 191–211.
  • Kasworm, C., & Blowers, S. (1994, June). Adult undergraduate students: Patterns of involvement (Final research report to U.S. Department of Education). Knoxville, TN: College of Education, University of Tennessee.
  • Keith, P. M. (2007). Barriers and nontraditional students’ use of academic and social services. College Student Journal, 41(4), 1123–1127.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of motivational beliefs in conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 115–135). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. E., Patall, E. A., & Messersmith, E. E. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 591–614. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02080.x
  • Luttrell, V. R., Callen, B. W., Allen, C. S., Wood, M. D., Deeds, D. G., & Richard, D. S. (2010). The Mathematics Value Inventory for general education students: Development and initial validation. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 70(1), 142–160. doi: 10.1177/0013164409344526
  • Luzzo, D. A. (1999). Identifying the career decision-making needs of nontraditional college students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77(2), 135–140. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02433.x
  • Mattanah, J. F., Ayers, J. F., Brand, B. L., Brooks, L. J., Quimby, J. L., & McNary, S. W. (2010). A social support intervention to ease the college transition: Exploring main effects and moderators. Journal of College Student Development, 51(1), 93–108. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0116
  • McClure, J., Meyer, L., Garisch, J., Fischer, R., Weir, K., & Walkey, F. (2011). Students’ attributions for their best and worst marks: Do they relate to achievement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 71–81.
  • Morris, E. A., Brooks, P. R., & May, J. L. (2003). The relationship between achievement goal orientation and coping style: Traditional vs. nontraditional college students. College Student Journal, 37(1), 3–8.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Figure 17. Actual and projected numbers for enrollment in all postsecondary degree-granting institutions, by age group: Fall 1996, fall 2010, and fall 2021. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/projections/projections2021/figures/figure_17.asp?referrer=list
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543.
  • Perez, T., Cromley, J., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329.
  • Rausch, D. W., & Crawford, E. K. (2012). Cohorts, communities of inquiry, and course delivery methods: UTC best practices in learning—The hybrid learning community model. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 60(3), 175–180.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Tilley, B. P. (2014). What makes a student non-traditional? A comparison of students over and under age 25 in online, accelerated psychology course. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 13(2), 95–106. doi: 10.2304/plat.2014.13.2.95
  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 125–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.03.002
  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796.
  • Van Ryzin, M. J., Gravely, A. A., & Roseth, C. J. (2009). Autonomy, belongingness, and engagement in school as contributors to adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 38(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10964-007-9257-4
  • Vispoel, W., & Austin, J. (1995). Success and failure in junior high school: A critical incident approach to understanding students’ attributional beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 377–412.
  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.
  • Wyatt, L. G. (2011). Nontraditional student engagement: Increasing adult student success and retention. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59(1), 10–20.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.