Training Sessional Academic Staff to Provide Quality Feedback on University Students' Assessment: Lessons From a Faculty of Law Learning and Teaching Project

References

• Bailey, R. (2009). Undergraduate students' perceptions of the role and utility of written “assessment feedback.” Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 1, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L., McGovern, A., & Richards, K. (2015). Degrees of difference? A preliminary study of criminology degrees at Australian universities. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48(1), 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayerlein, L. (2014). Students' feedback preferences: How do students react to timely and automatically generated assessment feedback? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 916–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, A., Curtis, S., Goodwin, M., & Shields, S. (2013). What feedback do students want? Politics, 33(1), 66–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bols, A., & Wicklow, K. (2013). Feedback: What students want. In S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless, & M. Taras (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education: Developing dialogue with students (pp. 19–29). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., Goodman, J., & Yasukawa, K. (2010). Academic casualization in Australia: Class divisions in the university. The Journal of Industrial Relations,52(2), 169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chur-Hansen, A., & Koopowitz, L. (2005). Formative feedback in teaching undergraduate psychology. Academic Psychiatry, 29(1), 66–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coaldrake, P., & Stedman, L. (2013). Raising the stakes: Gambling with the future of universities. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H., Dobson, I., Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, L. (2009). Australia's casual approach to its academic teaching workforce. People and Place, 17(4), 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Coombe, K., & Clancy, S. (2002). Reconceptualizing the teaching team in universities: Working with sessional staff. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(2), 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, T., Pittaway, S., Yost, H., & McCarthy, R. (2013). Students' perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: Ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3), 349–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, N. (2007). “Feed-forward”: Improving students' use of tutors' comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 271–283.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haffling, A., Beckman, A., & Edgren, G. (2011). Structured feedback to undergraduate medical students: 3 years' experience of an assessment tool. Medical Teacher, 33(7), 349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, F. (2011). Essentials of research methods for criminal justice and criminology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & De Luca, R. (2014). Review of assessment feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 378–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Liu, X., & Zhou, Y. (2012). Give and take: A re-analysis of assessor and assessee's roles in technology-facilitated peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 376–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, R. (2007). Finding the real odds: Attrition and time-to-degree in the FSU School of Criminology and Criminal Justice (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students' perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S., Price, M., Carless, D., & Taras, M. (2013). Reconceptualising feedback in higher education: Developing dialogue with students. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, C., & Mertova, P. (Eds.). (2013). Enhancing learning and teaching through student feedback in social sciences. Oxford, England: Chandos.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbit, P., & Burton, S. (2006). Student justice perceptions following assignment feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(6), 655–670.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students' perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S., Burgess, J., Connell, J., & Groen, E. (2013). Casual academic staff in an Australian university: Marginalised and excluded. Tertiary Education and Management,19(2), 161–175.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiner, L., Louis, M., & Nelson, D. (2012). A research-based approach to college student success. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Silén, C., & Uhlin, L. (2008). Self-directed learning: A learning issue for students and faculty! Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), 461–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., & Coombe, K. (2006). Quality and qualms in the marking of university assignments by sessional staff: An exploratory study. Higher Education, 51, 45–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taras, M. (2006). Do unto others or not: Equity in feedback for undergraduates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 365–377.
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, C., & McAlpine, L. (2004). Evaluating student learning. In A. Saroyen & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Rethinking teaching in higher education: From a course design workshop to a faculty development framework (pp. 95–115). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar